news-record.com

OPINION

Are we spending ourselves into oblivion?

Sunday, December 13, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

By W.D. Goldston Jr.

Can we spend our way out of this recession?

Over the past months, this question keeps popping up in my mind. Having been born during the recession of the late-1920s and early 1930s, I have seen many things, some good, some bad. I do not remember during all these years any time we were able to spend our way out of our financial problems, particularly with other people's money or on borrowed money. Our choice was to accept our situation or "work" our way out.

It seems our political leaders now feel the only way to solve the problems created by greedy financial institutions is to mortgage our future generations.

Just read the newspapers or listen to TV: They can solve all our problems by spending more. This applies to our federal, state, county and local governments.

Our federal government already has bailed out companies for mistakes that were caused by greed. Now they want to pass a health bill that is good enough for the average citizen but not good enough for our elected officials. They work for us, we pay their salaries with our taxes, so why would they not want to join the health plan they want us to pay for? With so many government employees who also work at our expense, it is difficult for the few productive workers to cover all of their great programs.

Our state government is in the same situation. Our political leaders feel we can spend our way out of our problems. There again, they are mortgaging our future, taking money out of trust funds to cover their overspending. And the latest way to borrow more is for the governor to borrow money from the contractors to build road projects she has promised. This is money that the state would be obligated to pay back. Is this legal, without the consent of the voters? I would think not.

Our local governments are doing the same thing. Just refer to the latest information about Greensboro's proposed swim facility. Price before the vote: low; price after the vote: high. The only hope of reimbursement is the tourism it will create, but this is not guaranteed. Taxpayers are on the hook.

In Rockingham County, we have the same situation. We were told by our county manager and commissioners we could have a horse facility and no tax money would be used to build or operate it. Now it appears approximately $500,000 has been spent, and the operating cost for three to five years will have to be paid with tax money.

The horse complex will only help one area of our county, and we are told the tourism tax will pay for the operation -- not guaranteed, but expected. The fallback is taxes.

We are also building a new courthouse, which is sorely needed, for more than $40 million. We have already approved this and a tax increase to fund it.

Our community college has requested that the county commissioners borrow millions of dollars to build an auditorium on its campus. Great idea, but who pays the money back? I feel sure it will be the taxpayers in a county with unemployment over 12 percent.

So the question is: Who are our political leaders representing, themselves or the taxpayers?

I am concerned about the future of our country. Is it possible we are headed in the wrong direction with our liberal leaders who cannot seem to see the future? Do they even care about the future, or just their immediate re-election?

W.D. Goldston Jr. is a former Democratic state senator from Eden.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Sawdust

December 13, 2009 - 9:21 am EST

Henry Morganthau, Treasury Secretary during the Great Depression, realized the folly of trying to spend our way out of a recession. He said, after 6 or8 years of trying to do just that, "We have tried spending money. We are spending more money than ever before, and IT DOES NOT WORK" (emphasis mine)

Fortunately for the economy, if not the rest of the world, WW2 came along and lifted the economy. With a weak leader at the helm of the most powerful nation in the world, the likelihood of a repeat grows by the day.

SusanBAnthony

December 13, 2009 - 3:19 pm EST

Nobody wanted to bail out the banks. It was the lesser of two evils. Once the banks started failing, people would be running on the banks, withdrawing their money, causing more and more of them to fail, just like during the Great Depression when many of our grandparents lost their life savings. It would be impossible for the FDIC to pay off trillions to depositors without bankrupting the whole country. We were on the edge of the precipice. We almost went over. That bailout money is now being paid back with interest. On another point, don't forget that about one-third of the bailout money is being used to pay unemployment benefits. What would those people do without it? What would our country look like without it? Nobody wants to do this, but the alternative is disaster.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search