news-record.com

OPINION

Public needs to know more about fast-food

Wednesday, December 9, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

The obesity rates in the United States are rising at an alarming rate due to many factors, with poor diet being the leading cause.

Many Americans are now dependent on fast food every day. Only in the last few years have a few fast-food chains been willing to release their nutritional facts to the public.

Many that have released their nutritional facts only have the information listed on their Web site, making it more difficult for individuals to access and almost impossible for low-income populations who do not have access to computers.

If Americans were able to see what they are putting into their bodies, perhaps many would make the choice to eat healthier options.

All foods sold in supermarkets are required to display the nutritional facts on the back of the box or wrappings, so fast-food restaurants should be held to the same standard.

McDonald’s has increased the availability of these facts by placing them on the back of all the containers in which the food comes.
If all fast-food chains would be forced to do the same, it could make a difference in this fast-food nation.

Elizabeth Livingston
Greensboro

Comments

This letter has been closed to new comments. Comments are accepted on select letters to the editor between the hours of 7 AM and 5 PM, EDT, Monday through Friday.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

bcparsons

December 9, 2009 - 3:34 am EST

and so it comes to pass - they went after the smokers and now they're going after y'alls fast food. who will be there when they come after you?

Get A Clue

December 9, 2009 - 5:35 am EST

bc, snuff out that butt and step away from your Big Mac, if only long enough to realize that posting nutritional information doesn't require you to have to read it. (Just look down to see that you can't see your feet for proof.) And you're still permitted your drug addiction to nicotine, just not in my face in a few places.
The people who will be there when they "come after you" are called EMTs, bc. Fortunately, they'll have oxygen and a very sturdy stretcher.

bcparsons

December 9, 2009 - 6:42 am EST

i hear there's a new book out. it's titled english comphrehension for dummies - it might explain to you the part of "y'all" that you don't seem to understand. but thanks for the entertainment this am - the paper was lacking!

Panacea

December 9, 2009 - 8:47 pm EST

Good point, Clue.

They now make ER stretchers capable of carrying up to 800 lbs. They also make specialty ambulances for the morbidly obese.

I recall many a morbidly obese patient dragged into my ER on a regular stretcher. The medics would put a large tarp on the stretcher, then the patient and basically use the wheels to drag the patient along. They didn't dare raise the stretcher.

bcparsons

December 9, 2009 - 5:49 am EST

i'm not the one with the problem seeing my feet - i don't do fast food. take your sanctimonious attitude elsewhere.

neocon

December 9, 2009 - 5:58 am EST

Do we need a second front in the war on poverty to address the computerless?

...a computer czar...

maybe?

bcparsons

December 9, 2009 - 6:22 am EST

neocon: have you ever noticed how easy it is to make a nonsmoker go crazy?

JGALT

December 9, 2009 - 12:39 pm EST

Maybe so, we already have a burger king.

neocon

December 9, 2009 - 7:03 am EST

I gave up the fragrant leaf more than 20 years ago and I rarely eat at fast food joints. (maybe a trip to Wendy's once a month for a chicken sandwich and fries), but do gooders like Elizabeth Livingston clucking their tongues at folks who do rubs my fur in the wrong direction.

I'll admit I still enjoy some secondhand smoke when someone I'm with decides to light up. And yes, I DO inhale...

...deeply. :]

EDIT: This was re:bcparsons. The 'reply' button not working this am.

Bert

December 9, 2009 - 10:45 am EST

Just like when they tell me my scotch is bad for me in excess. Well DUH? That scary crowd, or their ancestors, actually got an amendment passed last century to take it all away. That worked well.

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 7:32 am EST

"McDonald’s has increased the availability of these facts by placing them on the back of all the containers in which the food comes. If all fast-food chains would be forced to do the same, it could make a difference in this fast-food nation."

Got it, all we need are nutritional labels on the fast food products. Then the lower income people who don't have computer access will finally realize that a Wendys triple Baconator with a Biggie Fries isn't good for them? The food nannies need to make this happen because people are too stupid to figure it out themselves.

Bert

December 9, 2009 - 10:45 am EST

The Baconator's no good for me?

truth

December 9, 2009 - 1:00 pm EST

Yeah, listing the nutritional content on their food has been really effective at keeping people away from Mcdonalds. That explains why the sales of McDonald's cheeseburgers and french fries have gone down the toilet. In fact, by the end of next year, McDonald's will be out of business. Maybe that 16 gallon rubbermaid tote of happy meal toys in my basement will be worth big money as collector's items?

firerescuechick

December 9, 2009 - 7:43 am EST

I wonder if getting this letter published was required for a class that Elizabeth Livingston is taking? It reads a lot like some letters that we were graced/punished with this past spring. Either that, or she just now saw "Super Size Me."

As to the letter writer herself, when the American public returns to a of couple novel concepts that I like to call "personal accountability" and "personal responsibility," meaning that John Q. Public takes responsibility for his own actions, and doesn't blame evvvvil corporations and everyone else for their problems, then this country can return to the greatness it once held.

And everyone knows that fast food isn't good for you. But those that eat it on a regular basis are the same ones that are waiting for the G-man to bail them out when their health goes to sh*%.

Interested

December 9, 2009 - 8:38 am EST

I believe you may be correct - this does read like a condensed version of an ENG 112 paper and it is the end of the semester.

While I agree that everyone should know by now that eating fast food regularly is not part of a healthy diet, you must remember that young adults have to learn some lessons on their own. Perhaps the writer, and members of any class she may have made a presentation to, will realize that their mother's preaching was on target.

Conundrum

December 9, 2009 - 10:13 am EST

“And everyone knows that fast food isn't good for you.” firerescuechick, I don’t agree with this. For the regular customers of fast food joints, especially those customers who live in low income areas, I don’t think that it is a stretch to say that they do not think that the FDA would allow fast food restaurants to sell items that have a negative effect on their health. It hasn’t been until recently, where there has been a tie in between high fructose corn syrup, obesity and type 1 diabetes in young children. Think about all of the things that contain high fructose corn syrup. In a lot of these neighborhoods, I am thinking about Randleman Road as an example, fast food restaurants and convenience stores definitely outnumber those places that offer healthy alternatives. But, if it wasn’t for the fast food joints, a lot of these neighborhoods would be barren when it comes to restaurants. You won’t find Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s or Panera Bread in these communities. And even if you did, the people would not be able to pay premium prices for healthy items. I can’t remember the comedian’s name, but, he said that America is the only country in which you see fat, poor people. In other countries, poor people aren’t’ fat.

Look at how many people, smokers and non-smokers, who have died from cigarettes over the years. There are a lot of people who did not associate cigarettes with the laundry list of carcinogens that they contain. They trusted that the government would not allow such a destructive product to be sold. Look at how long it took the government to include any sort or warning on the pack. Think about all of the birth control devices for women that were approved by the FDA, only to be taken off the market after more research was done. The Today sponge is one that immediately comes to mind, and I am thinking about the one that resembled matches and the device was placed under the skin. The FDA didn’t do its homework and women were affected by the rush to bring these things to market.

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 10:33 am EST

Conundrum, are you saying lower income people are so stupid they have to rely on the FDA to warn them that eating triple Baconators several times a week can cause obesity and related medical problems? I find that a stretch.

Bert

December 9, 2009 - 10:47 am EST

How 'bout the double?

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 11:40 am EST

Double Baconators are much more healthy Bert, so feel free to eat at least one per day.

Calories:

Triple - 1330 Double - 970

Fat grams:

Triple - 86 Double - 60

Cholesterol:

Triple - 345 mg Double - 235 mg.

So if you eat a Double Bert that will leave room for a large chocolate fudge Frosty shake with 530 calories, 13 grams of fat and 45 mg. cholesterol.

http://www.wendys.com/food/pdf/us/nutrition.pdf

Notice on this site they start with the salads and don't get to the burgers, etc. until the 5th page. I think it's a vast corporate conspiracy.

neocon

December 9, 2009 - 12:15 pm EST

I'm getting hungry...

And yes Dan, Connie is saying (unwittingly maybe) minorities are unable to comprehend the connection between triple cheeseburgers and weight gain without the government telling them...Thanks FDR.

rahrah

December 9, 2009 - 6:00 pm EST

and, perhaps, Dan if the calorie or fat count of the triple are on the menu, right next to the burger, the guy about to purchase the triple will think twice and get the double.

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 7:25 pm EST

You are correct rahrah, and that will leave room for the chocolate fudge Frosty.

Where have you been anyway?

Conundrum

December 9, 2009 - 12:30 pm EST

Dan, I did not imply that lower income people are so dense that they rely on the FDA to warn them about eating unhealthy food. For whatever reason, you are fixated on the "baconator." I said that those who are on the bottom of the economic ladder, trust that the food that they pay for at fast food places, will not cause them tremendous harm to their health. It isn't a question of them being stupid, it is a question of them being informed. Most people would rightfully assume that cigarettes are not helpful when it comes to their health, yet, the government feels the need the put a warning on a pack of cigarettes. Most pregnant women would rightfully assume that alcohol consumption would harm their unborn children, yet, the government warns them about alcohol assumption. Look below and read JDR's comments. They are reasonable and well thought out. Lower income people aren't stupid. But, I do believe that there is a correlation between economics, education and access to choices that are better for them in the long run. You should consider yourself lucky that your station in life allows you to ridicule something as arbitrary as a sandwich. There are others who would give their arms for some calorie, fat and sodium laden sandwich. There but for the grace of God!

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 12:53 pm EST

"I said that those who are on the bottom of the economic ladder, trust that the food that they pay for at fast food places, will not cause them tremendous harm to their health."

All people, regardless of income, trust that the food they pay for at fast food places, or anywhere else, will not cause tremendous harm to their health. That's as far as things like E. Coli, salmonella, etc.

So perhaps what you are saying is that lower income people think it's ok to eat Big Macs (see I switched from the Baconator) daily since there isn't a govt. warning label on the package? And if there was only a warning on a Big Mac package they would...ahem...be "informed" and change their eating habits?

If that is the case then why to we still have people who smoke and drink excessively? After all there are govt. mandated warning labels on those products.

truth

December 9, 2009 - 1:03 pm EST

Lower income people should at least know that they can prepare a bologna sandwich at home for a lot cheaper than a Big Mac. Maybe if they did that a little more often than the nightly stop at mickey dees, they could afford other things, like Medical Insurance.

Conundrum

December 9, 2009 - 2:12 pm EST

“So perhaps what you are saying is that lower income people think it's ok to eat Big Macs (see I switched from the Baconator) daily since there isn't a govt. warning label on the package? And if there was only a warning on a Big Mac package they would...ahem...be "informed" and change their eating habits?” Dan, you have a flair for the dramatic. This is not what I am saying.

I doubt that poor people eat daily at McDonald’s or any other fast food restaurant. Let’s say that they stay home and feed on bologna sandwiches as Truth suggests. The sodium in the bologna does not help, nor does the white bread. In addition to other unhealthy meats and breads, their homes are probably loaded with sugary drinks and other products that contain high fructose corn syrup. If these same people were told (think “food pyramid”) these items are not good for their health in the long run, they could choose to make healthier choices, and I highlight the word “choose.” I worked with a woman who smoked during her entire second pregnancy. I wasn’t around during her first pregnancy. But, I was told that she smoked during that one. So, even though she knew that she risked harming her children, her selfishness won out in the end. I think that she was one of those “…it won’t happen to me” people.

Don’t think that lower income people are the only ones who are ignorant about matters. I have read that “…only 23% of those with some college could locate Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Israel on a map.”

danagain

December 9, 2009 - 3:55 pm EST

Now you are switching it to home meals, I though the subject from the ltte writer was fast foods and lack of proper nutritional labeling.

Grocery foods have the info right there on the package. If people are going to buy a bunch of unhealthy junk at the grocery store then what is to be done?

I'll agree with rescuechick, poor nutrition choices are not unique to lower income people. Where is the personal responsibility? My God, what do we have to do, get nutrition specialists to peoples homes and show them what to eat?

firerescuechick

December 9, 2009 - 3:04 pm EST

Conundrum, did you know that it is possible to eat healthy for $1/day? It can be done. Using the "low income" excuse does not justify people being unaware that fast-food is not healthy for them. These chains are required to have nutritional information on all food that they sell in the restaurant. All a patron has to do is go up and ask to see it. It goes back to what I said about taking responsibility for your actions. If you eat fast food every day, your health will go down the toilet. People need to stop blaming everyone else for their problems. These evvvil corporations are here to provide a service and blaming them for your health problems, when you knew good and well that it wasn't good for you, further perpetuates the nanny-state ideal.

Panacea

December 9, 2009 - 8:51 pm EST

firerescuechick, please provide a source for this information.

Fresh fruits, vegatables, and meats are expensive. I'd love to know how to eat right for $1/day. Please elaborate.

firerescuechick

December 9, 2009 - 10:06 pm EST

There is actually a program going on now that shows people that you can in fact eat healthy for a little as a dollar a day. It was on the news last week or the week before. The director of the program tried it out first to see if it could be done and it can be. I did it myself for a month and I lost five pounds in the process. It is being run with the backpacks program through the food bank.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search