news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Parting gifts are too generous

Tuesday, November 17, 2009
(Updated 3:05 am)

 

When Stanley Battle stepped down in June as chancellor at N.C. A&T after only two years in office, he didn't go off the payroll. His $273,156 annual salary continued while he took a "study leave," which began July 1 and ends Dec. 31. He then has the opportunity to return to a faculty position at "a normal salary for his discipline."

Battle's arrangement is typical for the University of North Carolina system, which has been generous to a fault to outgoing chancellors and other top administrators. That policy may soon change, however, and for the better.

A committee of the UNC Board of Governors last week recommended stricter rules for granting study leaves for departing chancellors and presidents. The major revisions: Administrators could qualify for a six-month leave after five years on the job and only at a faculty-level salary. The full board should enact the new policy when it meets in January.

A paid study leave is reasonable if a chancellor is retiring on good terms and can still contribute to the university in a faculty position. In that case, he or she deserves time to enjoy a break and to prepare for a different role.

UNCG's Patricia Sullivan was granted a year's research leave at her $301,952 salary when she retired in June 2008 after a successful 13-year tenure as chancellor. Then she was to return to a tenured faculty position at 60 percent of that pay level. Sadly, she died in August.

In several instances, universities have paid top dollar for study leaves only to see the recipient accept a job somewhere else or simply retire, never returning to teach.

Franklin McCain, chairman of A&T's board of trustees, last summer explained the arrangement with Battle as an obligation. "We made an agreement, a gentleman's agreement, and we have to honor that," he said.

That is why the UNC Board of Governors must step in to bar such agreements in the first place. In these financially stressful times, state universities can't afford to provide lavish payouts, even to distinguished departing leaders, let alone to those who haven't met expectations.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

igliigli

November 17, 2009 - 8:15 am EST

I I agree the "parting gifts" are too generous but they are tiny compared to the millions fired UNC coaches walk away with.
College sports, the biggest taxpayer and student rip-off around.

DaveW

November 17, 2009 - 10:16 am EST

You turn every article about a UNC System school's finances into an athletics debate. If students and alums did not support sports with financial contributions of their own choice there would be no college athletics. People that enjoy athletics support it and therefore keep it going.

Lakeshia

November 17, 2009 - 10:39 am EST

This is typical of A&T's lack of integrity - they hand out money to administrators not doing their job and diplomas to those who could not earn them elsewhere -

aka66aphi

November 17, 2009 - 3:43 pm EST

"Parting gifts," so to speak, for outgoing educational administrators may be a little steep for the economic times in which we now live. By comparison, however, they may be far less costly than severance packages for corporate CEOs in similar circumstances. A review and amendment of the policy should define conditions under which such persons will have earned these rewards in the future. A&T did the right thing by honoring their agreement with Dr. Battle. While it may seem excessive to those of us who will never qualify for such a lucrative package, to have done less, once the agreement was sealed, would have amounted to breach of contract. This policy, as previously explained, is not exclusive to A&T; most state institutions have some sort of severance agreement with their CEOs. Flaws in the policy should be implemented from this time forward, not retroactively. Since the scope and responsibility of an administrator's job not entirely available to the public, it would be difficult for those outside the process to make an accurate evaluation thereof.

simondale88

November 18, 2009 - 12:17 am EST

I had a great time reading around your post as I read it extensively. Excellent writing! I am looking forward to hearing more from you.

Regards,
SEO Firm

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search