GREENSBORO — The Guilford County Board of Education wants to talk to police about the arming of school resource officers with Tasers.
The board voted 9-2 Tuesday night to invite the High Point and Greensboro police chiefs and the Guilford County sheriff to a meeting to talk about the controversial topic.
The board has discussed the issue of Tasers in schools. Several parents and community members have addressed the board on the issue over the past several weeks after a school resource officer used a Taser on a female student at Ragsdale High in September.
Days later, another resource officer was injured breaking up a fight at Northeast High. The sheriff’s office said the deputy did not use a Taser because of the controversy.
Board members are split on Tasers.
“Given the fact that school isn’t as dangerous as we thought, maybe it’s time to revisit Taser debate,” board member Sandra Alexander said.
The vote came after a report on school safety, which originally was composed by an unofficial committee formed by Deena Hayes to probe reports of gang activity in schools.
Hayes’ committee, working with school district data, found that reports of gang activity were well below other offenses, such as not complying with school rules and alcohol violations.
The majority of gang-related violations reported were limited to the wearing of gang-associated clothing and showing gang signs.
“I didn’t bring these people together to minimize the gang issue or to dispel that they exist,” Hayes told the board. “We just wanted accuracy in reporting and data.”
Earlier in the evening, a small group of people spoke out about violence in schools and how the district addresses threats of violence.
Three people, two who said they are Guilford County teachers, urged the board to strengthen district policies addressing threats of violence, make parents and law enforcement aware when threats occur, and hold students who threaten violence accountable.
Also Tuesday night, school board members lashed out at staff members for not having sufficient details about construction projects and costs.
The conversation heated up after a presentation by the district’s facilities team about future building guidelines. Board member Darlene Garrett asked how much developing the guidelines cost. When none of the four facilities department executives could answer, her frustrations boiled over. “This is an example,” she said referring to other times she’s asked about construction-related costs. “Nobody knows because nobody cares. We have a limited budget, and we should know what it costs.”
Board member Paul Daniels and Vice Chairman Amos Quick followed Garrett, echoing her frustrations.
Quick noted that the airport area high school not yet under construction — but approved under the 2008 school construction bond referendum — was originally proposed at $88 million and now is about $70 million and he still isn’t sure why the cost dropped or why it’s still expected to cost so much.
Chairman Alan Duncan took exception to his fellow board members’ comments, saying the board should concentrate on building schools at a reasonable cost but that also would last for generations.
“There are some counties that are doing the minimum. I don’t agree with that philosophy,” Duncan said. “I believe our staff is working hard to do the right thing.”
Hayes also noted that if the board is interested in saving money on construction, then policies should be developed to fill schools already built .
Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing @news-record.com
*This article has been edited to reflect the correct vote count. Board Vice-Chairman Amos Quick changed his vote after the print deadline.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.