news-record.com

The main reason this tragedy happened was because Dionne Warwick does astrology commercials.

I agree. Carr also killed someone, but he was enough of a human being to recognize he had done wrong. Her low bond is a joke, and a slap in the face to her victim's family and to all North Carolinians who value innocent human life and the right to be a law-abiding citizen on a bicycle. Clearly she is being enabled by an attorney with no concern for the public safety and by whomever is paying for her attorney.

I can't blame the lawyer; he's doing his job.

But I agree bond should have been much higher given the fact she's facing charges for FAILURE TO APPEAR on yet another charge of driving while revoked.

The judge who set her bond should be ashamed.

Oh, man, good job! And very interesting information!

Interestingly, both Doug Henderson and Locke Clifford have been president of the Greensboro Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.

JKLM: You are apparently unfamiliar with the bicycle-friendly culture present in North American cities like Davis or San Francisco, CA, Portland, OR, Tucson, AZ, Chicago, IL, Minneapolis, MN, Madison WI, Boulder, CO, or Canada's Montreal, QC and Ottawa, ON. Unlike Greensboro, and much of the southeastern US, these communities value and respect bicycling as an important part of the entire transportation system. You are apparently also unaware that in many European cities, bicycling is the dominant mode of transportation for short (under 3 miles) trips. In cities like Amsterdam and Groningen in the Netherlands; London, England;' Berlin and Munich, Germany; Paris, France; Copenhagen, Denmark; and Barcelona, Spain -- bicycles are not simply tolerated, they are absolutely everywhere. Those motorists who actually are out on the roads understand that roadway traffic would be exponentially worse if not for the road space saved by the sheer number of people on bicycles instead of on cars. Bicycling is acknowledged as a major part of the solution to urban transportation and resource conservation challenges, rather than a part of the problem. Greensboro is going through some growing pains right now -- the number of bicyclists on the road has increased (due to increased fuel costs, incremental improvements in bicycle infrastructure, growing environmental awareness, etc.) while at the same time the number of motor vehicle miles traveled has actually logged a decrease probably for the first time since the mid-70s. And it's not just the number of bicyclists that is growing -- the Greensboro Transit Authority has nearly doubled its annual ridership levels in just 5 years! Clearly the tide is (slowly) turning away from single-occupant motor vehicle travel as the "logical" or "preferred" option for Americans to get from point A to point B. But there's a steep learning curve involved. Most motorists on the road today have no idea how to safely interact with anything other than a traffic stream composed of 100% motor vehicles (and in many cases, even that much is a stretch -- although it's hard to put all the blame on their shoulders, since the driver's license exams rarely include any mention of bicycles). Unfortunately, a large number of bicyclists also are unaware of and untrained in safe bicycling practices (these are the folks who pulled the dusty Huffy 10-speed out of the basement for the first time in 20 years, or the non-English speaking immigrant trying to get to work, who can't afford a bus pass, much less a car). Compounding the problem are the bicyclists who are well aware that all traffic laws apply to them, but choose to ignore, or selectively obey the law, or who ride erratically or aggressively in a mis-guided attempt to claim their "right to the road." When you really get down to the root cause of the conflicts between motorists and bicyclists on Greensboro streets, it is not a matter of inadequate traffic law enforcement, it is not a matter of inadequate bicycle facilities (per se), it is not a matter of safety education (per se), and it's not a matter of whose rights to use the road are superior. The real problem is that we're all way too focused on claiming, asserting, demanding, and maiming or killing each other over our "rights," when instead we should all be examining, understanding, and fulfilling our responsibilities as road users. Responsibilities include using the road in a safe and prudent manner at all times, and ensuring that no other road users come to harm as a result of one's own carelessness or selfishness. Is it justifiable for a motorist to mow down school children as they exit a stopped school bus, because they're in the way? No. Is it justifiable to a motorist to endanger the lives of bicyclists by attempting to pass them in an unsafe manner or in an unsafe location? No. Is it justifiable for a bicyclist to run red lights or change lanes without signalling, causing attentive and careful motorists to brake or swerve suddenly, in order to miss the bicyclist, and potentially being struck by the next car back? No. These are all selfish, irresponsible, and immature behaviors, that do not merit a "right" to use the road. So, getting back to your statement that "bikes and cars are not capatable," [sic] I strongly though respectfully disagree. It's all a matter of widespread behavior modification through safety awareness and education, stricter and more consistent enforcement of traffic laws, improved bicycle infrastructure, social marketing that emphasizes responsibilities over rights, and . . . time. And a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens would be a big help, too!

Amen to that. We need to let all Judges know if they do not throw the book....THE WHOLE BOOK ....at her they will have a tough time being re-elected.

Although Ms Dawson claims she thought she hit a deer, she has in fact been charged with several crimes: felony hit-and-run, crossing the centerline, driving with a revoked license, and death by motor vehicle, not to mention outstanding arrest warrants for failure to appear in court on previous driving with a revoked license charges. This is why she has hired defense attorney Locke Clifford. She has probably kept Mr. Clifford on retainer since her previous run-ins with law enforcement.

If Mrs. Dawson had had Mr.Clifford on retainer he surely would have dumped her for skipping a court date two years ago wouldn't he? Maybe they are close personal friends and she can get him to jump at a moments notice. My point was that you don't hire Mr. Clifford after hitting a deer, revoked license or not. If the reporting is accurate the timeline is incriminating.