news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Western, northwest turnout pushed Knight’s mayoral win

Thursday, November 5, 2009
(Updated Friday, November 6 - 5:17 am)

GREENSBORO — Galvanizing newly annexed residents to vote buoyed Bill Knight to victory in Tuesday’s mayoral election, observers say, while overconfidence in key districts for incumbent Yvonne Johnson sped her loss.

“I did not anticipate that people would have this attitude,” Johnson said, “that people didn’t think about voting and thought, 'She would be all right.’”

Maps showing majority support by precinct across Greensboro reveal a split of the city. The western half generally supported Knight, and the eastern half got behind Johnson.

But a deeper dig shows a discrepancy in turnout. Turnouts in the northwest and west precincts generally exceeded 10 percent, occasionally topping 40 percent, of registered voters.

Areas in the south and east saw lower turnout.

In a small election — 18 percent of registered voters cast ballots — every vote counts even more.

It’s something Knight and Johnson understand, for different reasons.

Johnson said supporters from some of her key precincts called Wednesday to say they didn’t vote because they believed she was a lock to win a second term.

Bill Burckley, an adviser to Knight’s campaign, said the campaign concentrated on northwest Greensboro and the Cardinal, where parts of the neighborhood had resisted annexation in 2007.

Knight bought print and television ads and also worked his contacts in service clubs and through people he knew as a member of the Cardinal Country Club. Knight also spoke to residents and visited service clubs.

Burckley said Knight needed to make up about 4,800 votes, the margin Johnson beat Milton Kern in 2007.

Knight won the city Tuesday by 935 votes, a margin that he collected across six of those newly annexed areas near Piedmont Triad International Airport.

Meanwhile, precincts in Johnson strongholds had much lower turnout than in 2007.

In the previous election, Johnson beat Kern 346-4 in one southeast Greensboro precinct.

In that same precinct Tuesday, only 286 voted for Johnson while two voted for Knight.

Johnson dropped votes throughout districts 1 and 2, which are traditionally black neighborhoods with a history of supporting Johnson.

Johnson said she and her campaign volunteers went door-to-door to win votes, made calls and mailed fliers. She even made appearances in the Cardinal neighborhood to talk directly to voters.

She said that poor turnout and “that lackadaisical, apathetic attitude that says 'everything is going to be all right’” led to her loss.

Others repeated that message.

Burckley has worked for both Melvin “Skip” Alston, the chairman of the county commissioners, and former City Councilman Earl Jones. He said he heard some dissatisfaction with Johnson because of what he called more of a focus on consensus-building than on building jobs and handling other issues in the city.

“Based upon that, I just had a feeling that the black community was not going to turn out like they had a couple of years ago,” Burckley said.

Not that turnout overall was too different. In 2007, a total of 32,845 voted in the mayoral race. In Tuesday’s vote, 34,347 voted.

Burckley said Knight focused on reaching middle-class voters who were likely to go vote for the bond issue.

“He was good at networking and using the network to get his message out,” Burckley said.

One third-party observer suggested that backlash politics — which some national pundits said influenced Republican wins in gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey — did not play into Johnson’s loss.

“The backlash will percolate rather than trickle down,” said Hunter Bacot, director of the Elon University Poll. “And in North Carolina, the two largest cites have Democrats as mayors. There’s no real pattern there.”

With Knight’s victory and other new faces on the nonpartisan City Council, there will be a majority of Republican-affiliated council members sworn in Dec. 1.

Sharon Hightower, who leads the Guilford Unity Effort, sees the election result as a local backlash against local leadership.

The mayor, schools superintendent, commissioners chairman and city manager are black.

“Too much African American leadership in this town prompted people to go out and remove and eradicate what they may have viewed as too much liberalism,” said Hightower, who did not work on Johnson’s campaign but backed her candidacy.

“I can’t blame it on anything other than we didn’t get out to vote,” Hightower said.

Contact Gerald Witt at 373-7008 or gerald.witt@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

H. Scott Hoffmann (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Mayor-elect Bill Knight receives congratulations from Julie Latimer during lunch at Stamey's Barbecue in Greensboro on Wednesday.

Additional Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

rasjayee

November 5, 2009 - 7:30 am EST

It's a shame that some people only vote because they're disgruntled or they don't vote because they think their candidate won't need their vote. Engaged citizenship means voting every time. we can't treat elections like American Idol. Interesting that in a town where 90% of the people whine and complain, only 18% voted

mohair.sam

November 5, 2009 - 7:43 am EST

I can understand voting because you're dissatisfied with current leadership -- hey, at least you're voting. But people calling to say they didn't vote because they thought their candidate "was a lock"? That's beneath pathetic. I agree, ras -- and without engaged citizens, we get exactly the government we deserve. No one has any business complaining.

buzzman

November 5, 2009 - 5:27 pm EST

She said that poor turnout and “that lackadaisical, apathetic attitude that says 'everything is going to be all right’” led to her loss. Yvonne Johnson thought she was talking about voters, but in fact, she was describing herself!

mamaboilermaker

November 5, 2009 - 8:13 am EST

Good for the Cardinal! If the city insists on forcing you in and taxing you, they have to let you vote, too! If the voters in other areas don't like the results, well, maybe they should vote next time. The polls were open in all areas of town, and early voting and absentee ballots were available, so there's no excuse.

Welcome, Cardinal. We know you didn't want to be here, but as long as you are, make it count.

jeffjet

November 5, 2009 - 8:27 am EST

Thank you folks for showing some reason in your thoughts regrading the election. I certainly applaud each of you in your responses. The comments are quite true and while each side can try to justify the reason the election was won or lost by singling out particular areas and saying that was the primary reason: In fact, it was not the reason. It was close, that is easily discernable, but having such poor turnout skews any attempt to draw meaningful conclusions about this or any election. What can be shown and each has pointed this out; apathy reigns supreme. I thought we had a great opportunity to break down some of the old and hardened ways in this community, but with this low turnout, the flames for resentment are only fueled more. I certainly hoped Greensboro would learn from some of it past mistakes and try to do things differently. It doesn't appear that is the case. Maybe the Knight in shinning armor didn't come riding in on a horse after all.

mundoqueganar

November 5, 2009 - 8:57 am EST

There is apathy, certainly.But it's not an apathy born of ignorance and not caring...it's an apathy born of the knowlege that none of the candidates that the establishment declares "electable" will represent the people's interests. They only represent the interests of the rich, while peddling a bunch of placating, condescending nonsense about the things we're told we're supposed to be concerned about. Then when they get elected, they get down to the real business of serving the rich. The problem isn't that people are not voting...because voting isn't going to make any difference in our lives anyway. The problem is that they are not organized to act in their own interests, outside the killing confines of "politics as usual". Every time people do that, ALL the politcians, Democract and Republican, fall all over themselves to condemn us for being irresponsible or "un-American".

Gerald Witt

November 5, 2009 - 9:33 am EST

Lighter voter turnout is common in election years that don't include congressional, senate or presidential elections.

A quick comparison to other cities that held mayoral elections shows that Greensboro's turnout is not particularly low, comparatively speaking.

In Cumberland County - where Fayetteville held a mayoral election - the turnout was less than 10 percent.
Charlotte's turnout, 21 percent, was a little closer to ours.
In Durham, which also elected a mayor, turnout was just below 8 percent.

All these are unofficial results, of course.

Before our election, I heard more than one elections official say that they'd be shocked if turnout here was greater than 20 percent.

timflowers

November 5, 2009 - 10:12 am EST

Congratulations to Knight, but I hope his campaign slogan of "Go Forward Greensboro" is more than just GOP doublespeak. By campaigning to voters in annexed areas and by keeping the David Wray controversy alive, he seems to long for the past rather than wanting to go forward.

But if he can bring the city together with real, ethical leadership and steer us to the future that this great city deserves, I'll suport him 100%. We need a vision for the future and less discussion of what happened in the past. I hope Bill Knight is a mayor who makes things happen, rather than being just another conservative who says "no" to every initiative in a misguided attempt to hold back time.

MR.SOFTBALL27

November 5, 2009 - 2:12 pm EST

Does anything make you happy?

holland4

November 5, 2009 - 10:56 pm EST

Ha! I, too, have noticed that about Mr. Flowers.

Brandon Burgess

November 5, 2009 - 11:01 am EST

Sharon Hightower, is it not possible that residents are dissatisfied with Johnson's leadership and lack of direction? No, it must be because she is black. Even Yes Weekly, who supported Johnson, stated that they are supporting her with the hope that she will perform better as mayor if re-elected.

tuffi

November 5, 2009 - 11:19 am EST

I agree with you totally. I don't care if the person is green with blinking lights for eyes, if that person can do the job for Greensboro fine. Some black people will always play the race card if they don't win.We have several Black people in leadership doing a fine job. I'm really tired of hearing about Black vs White. The Blacks keep the diversity thing from ever being equal.

fisher

November 5, 2009 - 2:27 pm EST

I went and voted to get Johnson out of there. It didn't really matter what the other name was.

lovegboro

November 5, 2009 - 12:01 pm EST

I really am disheartened by the fact that most posters believe that black citizens of Greensboro only vote for black candidates. I have lived in this city for over 10 years and have seen the same sentiment over the course of those 10 years. I am black and did not vote for Johnson in the first election, and subsequently did not this election. I don't necessarily vote for candidates based on their race, I vote because I believe they can be effective in their office.

I wish we could get beyond the race issue and come together as citizens in this city to support the person who has been elected. We need people to believe that Greensboro is a city for everyone. Without that, I am concerned that we cannot move forward and remain competitive with our neighbors. Let's be more civil about this and try to work together for the good of all Greensboro citizens.

Beachwalk

November 5, 2009 - 2:49 pm EST

"I have lived in this city for over 10 years and have seen the same sentiment over the course of those 10 years. I am black and did not vote for Johnson in the first election, and subsequently did not this election."

I agree with you, but you do know that you are minority within your own race. The last presidential election proves that most black voters will vote based on race. Obama got 95% of the black vote.
The numbers also prove that white voters do not vote based mainly on race. 43% of whites voted for Obama.
Going by these numbers blacks are much more motived by race, than by issues, when it comes to their votes.

runningboi

November 5, 2009 - 9:51 pm EST

You should do your research before making such an ignorant comment. What you failed to realize is that blacks tend to vote for democrats, that’s no secret. What % of the black vote did Gore get, 91%. What % of the black vote did Clinton get, 89%. Were they black?

Blacks did not vote for Obama because he was black, they voted for him because he was a democrat. If your logic is true then why aren’t blacks standing behind Michael Steel? Isn't he black?

Lakeshia

November 5, 2009 - 2:58 pm EST

Spot on, Beachwalk -

Goober

November 5, 2009 - 3:08 pm EST

I think the city council and mayoral races will forever chance because of the forced annex of the cardinal area... It will have a last impact, probably not one anticipated. We are active and we vote. We won't put up with this mess. Those of you who voted to eat us... break out the tums...

mamaboilermaker

November 5, 2009 - 4:56 pm EST

LOL! Love your analogy. The city deserves this. All they wanted was your money, but now they have to put up with y'all and you actually get out and vote.

Dayton

November 5, 2009 - 7:04 pm EST

If the new mayor is smart the first thing he will do is get rid of City Manager Rashad Young. He left Dayton in shambles. Just look at his record in Cincinnati and Dayton.

All you have to do is google LaShawn Pettus-Brown a college buddy of Rashad's that got special favors in the form of $184,000 from the City of Cincinnati. http://www.irhine.com/index.jsp?page=home_empire
He skipped town with the money. Scroll to the bottom of the article and read all about Rashad Young's involvement.

In Dayton he promoted another college roommate into a position that was created in the Water Department specifically for him. On his way out the door he attempted to abolish a union position to create a position for said college roommates wife. She was given job after job in the City on a part time basis so he could bi-pass the civil service process. He tried to create an unclassified position to put her in. To ward off the union the promotion was stopped and then she was moved to another created position in another department.

He has a pending lawsuit for unlawful termination after he fired the ITS Director for cooperating with the FBI who was investigating his step grandfather Charles Evans who was the Deputy Director of ITS. He was arrested, tried and convicted of child pornograph. Images were found on his home and office computers.

He settled a bogus department of justice case against the City of Dayton which essentially forced the City to pay out money to black people who never even applied to be police and fire fighters. He has essentially crippled the City of Dayton's ability to hire any police or fire for the next couple years.

He created a special apprentice program targeted at hiring minorities and giving them preference points for the police and fire exams. This lead to the DOJ investigation.

These are just a few of his screw ups. All you have to do is Google him.

If the new mayor is smart he will give Rashad Young his walking papers ASAP.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 60°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 62° L: 37°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search