news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: City’s stunning change

Wednesday, November 4, 2009
(Updated 3:05 am)

As Bill Knight visited Greensboro polling places Tuesday, “a lot of people said they were voting for me,” he noted as those votes were being tallied during a tense evening at the Old Guilford County Courthouse.

By the time the count was completed, the retired certified public accountant had collected enough votes to unseat first-term Mayor Yvonne Johnson — whose problem was that people were not voting for her.

Turnout was low in parts of the city — Districts 1 and 2 — where Johnson drew her strongest support in an easy victory two years ago. Failing to energize supporters isn’t the way to win re-election. After serving seven terms as an at-large councilwoman and one as mayor, maybe Johnson didn’t believe she was in trouble.

“I knew it was going to be close,” she said moments after conceding to Knight. It was. But a member of her campaign steering committee said no one in the Johnson camp expected defeat.

Knight, though, said change was in the wind.

“Four months ago, no one knew me,” he said. “It’s been all about change. Voters want change.”

Danny Thompson, a first-time candidate elected to an at-large seat along with Nancy Barakat Vaughan and incumbent Robbie Perkins, agreed.

“The people were ready for a new direction,” he said, noting that he, Knight, Vaughan and District 2 Councilman-elect Jim Kee share a common vision of making Greensboro more attractive for investment and job creation. Thompson called it a “mandate.”

That might be too strong a word, especially given the close vote in the mayor’s race — just over 51 percent for Knight. But the newly elected mayor didn’t express concern, saying that after a narrow victory “you go to work and show you’re working for the good of the public.”

One of his first tasks, he said, is to meet Rashad Young, the new city manager — who now will be working for a substantially different City Council than the group that hired him. Knight said he’s heard only good things.

Johnson, meanwhile, was gracious — to a point.

“I was blessed to serve this city (as mayor) for two years,” she said. “I think I did a good job.

“The negative stuff was overpowering,” she added.

She didn’t elaborate, but Knight raised the forced resignation of former police Chief David Wray during the campaign, calling it based on race. Maybe that issue influenced the outcome; maybe voters looked for more business-oriented leadership; or maybe a low turnout eroded Johnson’s support.

Whatever the explanation, the voting is over and a new mayor and City Council will be seated soon. Forming a clear vision for the city is task one.
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Panacea

November 4, 2009 - 8:32 am EST

Best wishes to the new GSO city mayer and council. I certainly hope they can improve things in Greensboro.

I am still grateful I no longer live there.

williag_1998

November 4, 2009 - 9:55 am EST

Panacea, with comments like that we're real glad you don't live here anymore either. We've got our problems, but we'll get them worked out fine without people like you. Since you're so glad you don't live here anymore, it does seem odd that you still read the paper and care about local happenings. Have a great time wherever you are.

Panacea

November 4, 2009 - 1:36 pm EST

Good luck with that.

justified

November 4, 2009 - 9:22 am EST

I second that.
Now its time for the people in the county to wake up.

pragmatist

November 4, 2009 - 9:42 am EST

I'm kind of glad people who spell "mayor" like it's on a package of hot dogs live here no longer, too. JK.

buzzman

November 4, 2009 - 10:50 am EST

This article offers possible reasons why Yvonne Johnson didn't prevail. Although they may have been a small factor for some folks, other possibilities should be considered.
I believe that the low voter turnout in districts 1 & 2 are those folks saying that they no longer want to be told what to do by special interest groups and that most of them are tired of those groups and a few individuals playing the race card.
Yvonne Johnson lost votes in other areas of the city simply because she was not a leader during her term as mayor - not being able to properly conduct a council meeting says a lot.
Anyway, I now have hope for Greensboro returning to being a NORMAL city with only the small everyday problems that other cities encounter.
I don't quite understand how Robbie Perkins survived this election other than he simply knows so many people. You'll notice that he's already aligning himself with certain council members. But at least Yvonne & Goldie are no longer members of the "Perkinettes."
It will also be quite interesting to see how TDBS acts since she is not going to be able to do all the talking when the new council is seated - at least I hope not!!!

ms. malone

November 4, 2009 - 10:51 am EST

Way to go, Greensboro! The ~18% that chose to excercise their right to vote made a good choice yesterday in bringing much needed new leadership to our city. BIG step in the right direction!

Maybe now our city council can move away from being a puppet to the police department, and the S-PAC, and begin working for the citizens, the taxpayers..... heck, maybe as full time mayor, Mr. Knight will even be able to manage an organized and respectful city council meeting, which has been seriously lacking for the last several years.

I only wish that the people of distric 1 had had enough foresight to give Luther Falls a chance.... (perhaps if Mayor Knight makes Diane B-S behave, she won't run again in 2 years? One can always hope). I simply do not understand why this group of people continue to place the majority of their votes for her, when they have such a well qualified candidate-- who also seems to be CIVILIZED, to boot. Keep campaigning, and staying involved, Mr. Falls--- the "win" was very narrow, and you would be a great replacement for the incumbent of Distric 1.

AirDoc

November 4, 2009 - 12:57 pm EST

I fail to see what's so stunning about this election result. It seems as if this election was Johnson's to lose. And about the only way she could lose was to do nothing.....and that is what she did. Johnson aligned herself too closely with Mitch, and that was one of the huge deciding factors in her loss to Knight. I am not a political junkie in any sense, but I saw this one coming a mile away.

timflowers

November 4, 2009 - 7:09 pm EST

It's funny to me how both Democrats and Republicans think that the other side needs to "wake up". As a third party voter (Libertarian) it appears to me that people in both the major parties need to wake up.

But aside from that, I think Yvonne Johnson is a good person but neither she nor the council seemed to have a grand vision for our city. Greensboro is a great place but we've suffered too many years with "leadership" that seemed stuck in the past, unable to figure out what we need to be doing for the future. One big concern I have with Knight is his insistence to rehash the David Wray affair. That too, needs to be moved on from.

We need to stop doing stupid things that we then spend the next 30 years analyzing and apologizing about.

ms. malone

November 4, 2009 - 9:01 pm EST

Agreed, t-flowers... however, the difference with the David Wray controversy is that it is not something that just "happened many years ago".... it's still pretty fresh, considering the fact that there remains unresolved/ ignored issues under the incumbent council..... there are legal considerations according to city "policy" that should be brought to light and addressed, and righted, if possible.....and THEN dropped. After all, the "racial" legal cases against the city from the same story/ same time, are still an unresolved issue within the city/ police departments, and have cost tax payers many, many dollars. Since many of those "cases" are still pending, I only think it fair that Mr. Wray have the same consideration.

But, I do agree.... it would be good to have it properly addressed, rectified where (and if) possible, and THEN MOVE ON (forward), once and for all.

Fred

November 5, 2009 - 6:15 am EST

Although I no longer live in the city I do work and shop there; I too am glad I no longer sleep there where the inmates have been running the asylum.
Browns Summit Fred

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search