news-record.com

NEWS

Tar Heels support public option in poll

Tuesday, November 3, 2009
(Updated 1:58 pm)

RALEIGH — Tar Heels seem to agree on this much: The nation’s health insurance system is not what it should be.

Nearly 77 percent of those surveyed in a recent Elon University Poll say health care in the United States is “in need of reform.”

Just what that reform should be is a dicier question for those responding to the poll:

  • 54 percent of respondents say they’d favor a federally created public option to compete with private health insurance.
  • Only 41.3 percent of respondents say they’d use a public health insurance option if one became available.
  • And only 41.1 percent of respondents said they would favor a universal health care scheme — under which everyone is insured by a government program. That’s down from 49.9 percent when the same question was asked in March of this year.

“Obvious from these results is that citizens recognize that the health system is in need of reform, but, like most Americans, are divided over how to do it,” Hunter Bacot, director of the Elon University Poll, said in a news release.

That division over health care reform, particularly the issue of a public option, is on display in North Carolina’s congressional delegation.

Sen. Kay Hagan, a Greensboro Democrat, supports a public option that Democratic leader Sen. Harry Reid intends to insert in the Senate version of the health reform bill, according to her spokeswoman.

“I have said all along that I support a backstop option for people without access to employer-sponsored health care,” Hagan said in a statement.

Sen. Richard Burr, a Winston-Salem Republican, has opposed the various public option plans.

“I will oppose any form of a public option as it would breach the doctor/patient relationship that is the foundation of our health care system,” Burr said in a written statement, adding that he did think insurance reform was needed.

Reaction has been mixed on the House side as well.

Rep. Brad Miller, a Raleigh Democrat, has said the proposed regulations under health insurance reform bills are less stringent than those imposed on the state’s auto insurance system.

But Virginia Foxx, a Banner Elk Republican, characterized during a floor speech Monday the Democratic-led health care reform effort as a threat to American freedoms.

“I believe we have more to fear from the potential of that bill passing than we do from any terrorist right now in any country,” Foxx said.

Spouses bill passes

The House Monday passed S 475, the Military Spouse Residency Relief Act, a bill introduced by Burr.

According to Burr’s office, the measure allows “military spouses to maintain or change residency when their family relocates due to military orders.”

Members of the military frequently have to move when they’re restationed. Currently, they have the option of keeping their official residency for purposes of voting or taxes in the state of their prior posting or moving it to the new state.

This measure, which is now headed to President Barack Obama for his signature, would extend the same privilege to their wives or husbands who currently don’t have that option.

“At a time when we are demanding so much from our military families, this bill will make their lives and constant transitions a little easier,” Burr said in a statement.

House votes

House votes of interest during the past two weeks have included:

H.R. 3585: Solar Technology Roadmap. It provides funding and other support for developing solar power technology in the United States.

The measure passed 310-106 and now goes to the Senate for consideration.

For: Democrats Miller and Mel Watt, of Charlotte. Against: Republicans Howard Coble of Greensboro and Foxx.

H.R. 2996: Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2010. The House approved the House-Senate conference agreement for the spending bill, one of 13 Congress typically passes every year.

The measure provides funding for the Environmental Protection Agency, including $3.5 billion in grants to upgrade public water systems and sewage treatment systems.

The bill now goes to the president for his signature.

Democrats Miller and Watt voted for the measure. Republicans Coble and Foxx voted against.

Senate votes

Senate votes of interest during the past two weeks have included:

H.R. 2996: Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations, 2010. See explanation under House votes.

Hagan voted for the measure. Burr voted against.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

unclefuzzy

November 3, 2009 - 6:12 am EST

People that want a public option should read the analysis of Pelosi's bill in the Wall Street Journal. You can find this article online at WSJ's website also. It makes it plain to see that Washington DOES NOT have America's best interests or well-being in mind. Just more taxes, fees, and fines on American citizens to help pay for this massive 1990 page bill.
Obama's administration is a bigger threat to America than any terrorist group.

newkid

November 3, 2009 - 12:32 pm EST

Oh, right, the Wall Street Journal...THEY always have the best interests of the public in mind! And who owns that bastion of big business? Rupert Murdoch.

Uncle, you really are "fuzzy"!

Norm*

November 3, 2009 - 6:32 am EST

Geez, I pay more in health insurance and medical costs (deductibles, out of pocket etc) than I pay in taxes. Taxes represent the best value for my money. Why not take profit out of health care insurance?

Blair

November 3, 2009 - 6:40 am EST

The title of this story is completely misleading - perhaps it is bias. It should read that most people would not choose the public option if there was one. Read your own story N&R.

Panacea

November 3, 2009 - 8:21 am EST

Read it again. The headline says Tarheels support a public option, not that they want to enroll in one. You can support the public option even if you don't plan to enroll in it yourself.

tledford

November 3, 2009 - 10:31 am EST

If you've already got insurance, you can't "choose" the public option anyway; you're not eligible for it.

Panacea

November 3, 2009 - 2:59 pm EST

Not at first, but I believe after a certain period of time anyone can enroll.

Laura

November 3, 2009 - 8:32 am EST

Opponents of the public option are mistaken in thinking it represents gov't takeover of health care. The public option is gov't insurance -- and the fact is that the insurance industry as it exists now really needs to be put out of business (not that reform will do that). The bill as it stands does not go nearly far enough. Our taxes have never, and will never go up 30 percent a year, the way our health costs do.

The health insurance industry is a parasite on American society. It creates nothing. It produces nothing. It returns nothing to society. It's sole function is to make billions in profit by denying health care to millions of people. The health insurance industry destroys lives. It drags the economy down. It is responsible for soaring health care costs and for weakening our economy.

Congress should be ashamed for supporting this industry. Anyone who defends the health insurance industry (Burr and Fox) doesn't know or care about the difference between right and wrong.

xeno10

November 3, 2009 - 9:39 am EST

Ms. Laura, thanks for your well-stated, "on target" comment! And I simply must ask, why isn't Virginia Foxx arrested and confined for the safety of herself and other members in the House chamber? I suspect this woman would be hauled off to jail for vagrancy if she were not "a privileged wingnut" in the U.S. Congress. And where, oh where, is the push-back? Alan Grayson, your moment has arrived again! Call this lunatic for what she is, and "let the feathers fly!" (Burr is another case, but not quite as looney.) Seriously.

tledford

November 3, 2009 - 10:30 am EST

Ding ding ding ding ding! On the nosey!

tledford

November 3, 2009 - 10:29 am EST

Ms. Foxxx is the most brilliant American comedienne since Carol Burnett.

histrion

November 3, 2009 - 1:41 pm EST

Senator Burr: Breach doctor/patient confidentiality? How does it make a bit of difference whether a government insurance bureaucrat or a private insurance bureaucrat has access to my medical records? That has to be the lamest excuse I've ever heard. If you just don't think the government should be in the health insurance business, okay -- that's consistent with your Republican ideology; we can agree or disagree on that. But "breach the doctor/patient relationship"? Are you proposing that insurers *not* have access to patient records? I don't know how either a public or private insurance organization could operate under that condition.

tledford

November 3, 2009 - 2:27 pm EST

Senator Burr was kicked in the head by a mule at age eight. He liked it so much that he made it an annual event that continues to this day.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search