news-record.com

NEWS

Knight vows to cut costs and bickering

Sunday, November 1, 2009
(Updated 7:41 am)

GREENSBORO — Bill Knight wants his first elected office to be a big one: mayor of the city of Greensboro.

Knight, 69, is a political newcomer, having run for office once.

But his lack of political experience isn’t an issue for his supporters, who say Knight is the man to whip the city’s finances — and its disagreeable elected officials — into shape.

But he will have to defeat incumbent Yvonne Johnson, who has remained popular among some constituents despite the trials of the last two years as mayor.

Knight says, plainly, he can do a better job.

Knight grew up in northeast Greensboro and attended college locally after serving in the Coast Guard.

As a certified public accountant, he started his own firm that later became a part of Sharrard McGee and Co., which today is one of the largest CPA firms in the Triad.

He helped that firm grow by expanding its business in the health care industry and worked to merge medical practices.

“He was very focused on, 'What is our goal? Now, how are we going to get there?’ He really laid out the strategic plan on doing that,” said Alan Scheppmann, managing director at Sharrard McGee, whom said Knight was his mentor.

It’s those accounting skills that supporters say will help Knight pick apart the city budget.

Knight said he would eliminate “tens of millions in wasted tax dollars,” according to one political advertisement.

Knight doesn’t have a line-item plan on how to do that yet, he said. But he said the city should consider where it can save on things such as trash disposal and personnel costs, especially as city expenses increase faster than revenues.

“I hear we need more police officers. Do we?” he said. “It makes me wonder, are we being efficient in how our officers are being used?”

Both mayoral candidates have run polite campaigns, staying away from personal attacks. But Knight has focused on one thing be thinks he can do better than the incumbent: run a smooth meeting.

The City Council has sometimes become unruly in its disagreements over the last two years. Meetings have lasted into the wee hours of the morning, as debates dithered on.

Knight said he would be able to keep people in line and get them to work together.

“We need someone who can build it into a cohesive working unit,” he said.

He led the Cardinal Golf and Country Club when it was a private organization in financial trouble and members had to decide whether to sell, which he cited as an example of his experience in leading through difficult situations.

Darrell Chambers, who served with Knight on the club’s board, said Knight, then president, fended off creditors and was able to lead the group through that tense time.

“He’ll tackle any problem that comes up,” Chambers said. “He is a good listener. He doesn’t jump to conclusions. He weighs all aspects of the situation and then makes a decision.”

Some eyebrows raised after Knight said that former police chief Robert White and current chief Tim Bellamy, who are black, were hired because of race, and former police chief David Wray was forced out because of race, a comment made during a candidate forum.

The point Knight said he was trying to make is that the most qualified person should be chosen for chief.

Knight has been a supporter of Wray, who resigned under pressure after complaints arose that black police officers were being targeted by their own department.

Throughout the campaign Knight has called for better leadership in the city’s problem-addled police department.

Knight says the city should be all inclusive but needs to quit focusing on racial issues and get to work.

Since retiring, Knight spends time playing golf, serving on the city’s Parks and Recreation Commission and doing missionary work. If elected, he said he would be a full-time mayor.

“It’s all about, in one word, leadership,” he said.
 

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

News & Record

BILL KNIGHT

Age: 69 Residence: 214 Ridgeway Drive Online: www.knightformayor.com Occupation: Retired certified public accountant; former partner of Sharrard, McGee & Co. How do you plan on reaching constituents if elected? “I would like to have the council hold periodic meetings — either regular meeting or updates — at locations around the city from time to time. In particular I think it would be helpful to reach out to the newly annexed areas that are just now becoming integrated into the city structure. Two years ago the city manager was supposed to hold regular briefings on city business, but it never materialized. I would like for the new manager to adopt this concept.” What should be Greensboro’s long-term plan for household waste disposal? Is reopening the White Street Landfill part of that equation? Why or why not? “The current request for proposal (RFP) for a waste disposal solution affords a good opportunity to place the matter on the table for informed discussion. The organization that made the presentation to City Council cited millions of dollars savings and new investment through use of White Street. I favor a continuation of this discussion.”

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

holland4

November 1, 2009 - 10:20 am EST

Why does the N&R continue to use that donkey and elephant graphic for City of Greensboro election stories when City elections are politically nonpartisan?

DonMoore

November 1, 2009 - 11:23 am EST

Despite the label of "Non-Partisan" of the City Council races, it is very apparent who is who based upon support, mailings, appearances, etc. May be it's time to call it like it really is.

buzzman

November 1, 2009 - 11:54 am EST

holland4 - because it's the N&R.

mtaylor27410

November 1, 2009 - 12:12 pm EST

I'm sure Mr. Knight is a fine fellow, but shouldn't we be concerned about this candidate making racially-based (and paranoid) comments about the police department's past promotions and firings, then saying the City should quit focusing on racial issues?! That Freudian slip followed by a disingenuous diversion tactic should be enough to disquality a candidate for Mayor. And is he saying he supports an exiled Police Chief (Wray) who used the City's limited law enforcement resources to spy on its own officers with a clandestine unit and electronic recording devices? Is this his idea of good government rather than transparency and due process?

I don't like the prospect of turning the clock back to the days of good-ol' boy politics as a response to the true social change being seen in our country now. Or the idea of a Mayor who's focused on micro-managing the budget, on which his/her vote carries no greater weight, rather than setting a vision for the betterment of Greensboro and working across all boundaries to share that vision and promote its adoption in all sectors. In our city, the office of Mayor distinguishes itself only by the privilege of presiding over the Council, thus calling for a consensus-builder, a description his supporters seem to hold in contempt (see comments on today's article on Yvonne Johnson).

And if leadership is his battle cry (a common, meaningless promise among newcomers to politics), surely there are more and better examples of leadership at this point in the candidate's life than leading the board of a private and exclusive country club (with an initiation fee of $12,500!). Where's the history of community volunteer leadership or other civic involvement?

Change for the sake of change is not a good enough reason to elect a newcomer to our City Council, the elected body that most closely affects our lives every day. Vote for Yvonne Johnson for Mayor.

williag_1998

November 1, 2009 - 5:59 pm EST

Just the fact that you mention race at all and think only about this as an issue tells me you are stuck in the dark days. It's time for progress and it's time for Johnson to go. She's just not what Greensboro needs to attract companies to locate here and create jobs. She's not polished and really doesn't radiate the kind of "can do" attitude that needs to be communicated right now.

liberatedthinker

November 1, 2009 - 10:46 pm EST

What are "the dark days" anyway?

mtaylor27410

November 2, 2009 - 9:33 am EST

I respect your opinion about Ms. Johnson (though I disagree), but you missed the point on the racism issue. And I also addressed mismanagement in the police department, transparency in government, Knight's preoccupation with the budget, our form of local government, the role of the Mayor, Knight's apparent lack of civic leadership, and change for the sake of change. It seems you are the one focused on one issue.

The N&R article reported that Knight made the eyebrow-raising race remarks in a public forum, then later attempted to dismiss them by saying we need to stop focusing on race. I DIDN’T interject race into this discussion; THE CANDIDATE DID, revealing a degree of race-based paranoia that I find unacceptable for the Mayor of Greensboro. It's fine for Knight to express those opinions as a private citizen, but I’m concerned about our Mayor having that attitude.

Mayor Johnson has revealed no racist tendencies that I've seen. The fact that she gives historically disadvantaged folks equal and proper consideration seems to be viewed by some in the majority as reverse discrimination. It seems some folks just can't stand to see minorities gain any ground toward equality. I'm in the majority by the way.

1234

November 1, 2009 - 8:30 pm EST

Lets have some change...change worked for the OBAMA camp...I am tired of Greensboro and the County of Guilford being thought of as a Three Ring Circus Act, how about one that is not a community organizer...the last two female Mayors were just that, huggers and feel gooders...we need leadership from someone that has run a business! The council did not even know that the Matt and Company were using $95,000 of taxpayer money to build an amphitheater on High Point Road! How about those monthly water bills VS quarterly...how about the costs associated with that move...on and on...Lets vote for Change, put a Knight in CPA shining armor to get this town back to its place of leadership.

jeaniegnc

November 1, 2009 - 5:23 pm EST

Been reading the RMA report MTaylor? Sure sounds like you bought into that faulty report. I bet you believe what you read about the "black book" also. Our current mayor said if there was a black book, then there should be a white book. All the misinformation about the black book has been proven wrong and our former city manager had to sign a sworn statement attesting to that fact.

mtaylor27410

November 2, 2009 - 9:02 am EST

I didn't mention the black book, did I? And besides, the way I read Mr. Johnson's affidavit, he simply said he couldn't say with certainty how the book was used, not that everything contended was false. I guess we'll just have to wait to see how the whole sordid affair shakes out (if the evidence ever comes out).

laserguidedloogie

November 1, 2009 - 11:50 pm EST

mtaylor - The answer is no, we shouldn't. Thanks for playing NR Jeopardy.

By the way, why in the hell should we "cut across bickering?" All these politicians always yammer about ending conflict and bickering. That's idiotic. Bickering is a good thing. When people aren't bickering, it's usually because someone is covering up something they know should be out in the open.

I say, bring on the bickering!

Ken
http://www.LaserGuidedLoogie.com

mtaylor27410

November 2, 2009 - 9:19 am EST

Did he say it or not? Talk about paranoia; some folks seem to think everything the N&R prints is a manipulated lie. Please don't tell me you rely on that Rhino rag, where the editor fails to meet any standards of journalism.

mtaylor27410

November 2, 2009 - 10:02 am EST

In reference to "bickering", I agree that debate is healthy for democracy. Candidates and citizens who want the Mayor to "control the council" simply don't understand the mayor's role. The Mayor can hopefully control the meeting and cut off excessive debate, but can and should not control the other council members. This is not Chicago.

REDDHOTT

November 3, 2009 - 3:37 pm EST

I agree with you Taylor however, no one person can be accountable for the actions of "other grown" people. If you dont want certain people in office then work hard to get them out or shut up. Provide a candidate worth running against Mayor Johnson if you feel that she isnt doing a good job. No need to be persistant with negative feedback. No one candidate will make everyone happy. It just the way it is. All I keep hearing is a lot of gripping from people that are apparantly sitting on the porch! Sorry but Knight will not be our shinning armor to revamp Guilford Co. Better luck during the next election. The votes from the majority will prevail. No if's and's or buts about that!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search