news-record.com

NEWS

School land choice upsets Southeast residents

Sunday, October 25, 2009
(Updated 7:55 am)

GREENSBORO — Many in the Southeast Guilford community thought they would get a new elementary school when they helped pass a $457 million school construction bond last year. Now, they say the Board of Education wants to build the school to serve the Eastern community instead.

Southeast residents are fighting the school board’s decision last month to build a Southeast area elementary school more than a mile north of Interstate 85 along Mount Hope Church and Robertson roads.

“My problem is, if that school goes up there, our kids will not get priority,” said Linda Welborn. “I’m willing to share, but I’m not willing to be cut out.”

Welborn began advocating for the school in 2006 and worked with school district officials to garner support for the construction bonds.

Material drawn up to promote those bonds included a map with stars showing in which regions the new schools would be built. The star representing the Southeast elementary school sits south of I-85, slightly north of where Alamance Elementary School is now. The new school was promoted as relief for Alamance Elementary because it is nearly at capacity with more than 780 students enrolled.

Welborn, and many others in her community, were infuriated when they learned the school board had approved an initial step in purchasing property that lies within the Eastern High district, not the Southeast High district.

The property will cost $11,550 an acre, for a total of $637,500 for 55 acres.

School district officials say they scoured the Southeast for property but found none that met all the criteria, including proximity to a major road, ease of access to utilities, available acreage and price.

Andy LaRowe, the district’s executive director of facilities and construction, said the new school still would draw students primarily from the Alamance Elementary district. But it also would draw some students from Sedalia and McLeansville elementaries, both Eastern area schools that are near capacity. 

The 2008 bond also includes additions at McLeansville Elementary that will increase capacity by 126 students.

District officials believe these Eastern communities are set to grow rapidly. But the idea that the Southeast area elementary school would be used to address crowding at Eastern area schools angers many in the Southeast.

“That’s not what the school was put on the bond for,” Welborn said.

Southeast residents say if the new school is built where the board is looking, it will be only a matter of time before it serves a majority of the Eastern community and Southeast families are back to begging for a new elementary school.

“One thing you have to consider in all this is where the growth is going to be,” said school board member Paul Daniels.

Daniels represents the Southeast area and said he understands why families are upset. The school board ordered district officials to look for more property in the Southeast. Daniels said they’ve returned with a couple of dozen properties, but the owners either aren’t interested in selling, didn’t return phone calls or wanted too much money for the land.

“I know if the school doesn’t go there, there are going to be some people with hurt feelings, but we’re doing all we can to be deliberate about this process,” he said.

The option to purchase the current property runs out Nov. 30. LaRowe said delaying the Southeast project could affect other bond projects, though he did not go as far as to say it would delay them.

School board member Sandra Alexander campaigned heavily in the Southeast and said she won’t support buying the land until LaRowe and his team have made every effort to find property farther south.

“I really want to see an exhaustive effort because I think the people of the Southeast deserve that,” she said.

Along with regular trips to school board meetings, Southeast residents are lobbying the county commissioners on the issue. The commissioners must sign off on the land purchase before the school district can move forward with the deal.

Commissioner Billy Yow, who represents the area, said the school board needs to back off the property it has optioned. Yow is suspicious of the land deal and said if the board can’t show him it has done its best to find other property, he won’t support the land purchase.  “For me to support this property, they are going to have to lay it out as the most feasible, reasonable option,” Yow said.

Southeast families said they were promised a new school and they intend to fight for it.

“I won’t quit fighting until they’ve signed on the dotted line,” Welborn said.

Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

jeaniegnc

October 25, 2009 - 11:16 am EDT

My goodness, has land outside the city increased in value during this economy to $11,550.00 an acre? Real estate values have dropped considerably and this seems overpriced.

mommy4many

October 27, 2009 - 10:32 pm EDT

Good grief! These are everyone's tax funds. I think it is great the school board is looking at overcrowding issues at 3 schools rather than looking out for the best interests of only one school. This sounds like a case where rich brats and their parents are throwing tantrums because they have to share.....get over it as bond money is part of everyone's tax dollars so why shouldn't it serve everyone in the County. If there are certain parents or polictial people that don't approve I think they should provide "private" additional funding out of their pockets to support "their" wants. After all, compare the bond money set aside for Mcleansville, Sedalia & Alamance. Alamance's bond approval exceeds the rest by far. I say forefit the bond money set aside as why would you need updating bond money and new school money also. Give that to the other 2 schools and I wouldn't care if the school was built in accordance to the grumbling people. Otherwise, zip it and be grateful for what you get or my suggestion is to give the bond money back to the County to use in other areas such as police, fire, etc.....all of which department are suffering due to lack of funds......

phoenix1

October 28, 2009 - 6:29 pm EDT

Seriously Mommy4many, have you seen the elementary school at Alamance? No airconditioning in the gym, try sitting thru any type of your child's program jammed into a gym with no airconditioning or fans. The bathrooms have not been updated since the school was built, heck some of the bathrooms still have separate facets for the hot and cold water. Alamance current enrollment is 782, Sedalia only has 481 and McCleansville has 380 students. I am sorry you feel all the children that attend Alamance are "rich brats", not sure how you determined that fact. I know my family is not rich and my children are not brats, All I want is for my children to have the same type of facility and student population which Sedalia and McCleansville enjoy now and the money is coming out of my pocket with the taxes. Maybe the parents of Sedalia and McCleansville should pay extra for the low enrollment and updated facilities. If you don't want to do that, maybe you should "zip it up" and be grateful for what you have and not be upset when other parents want the same for their children

SimplyMom

October 29, 2009 - 6:05 pm EDT

It is time to grow up and debate issues on a mature level without calling names. The Southeast received no funding on the 2000 or 2003 School bonds. There are 3 elementary schools in Eastern district. Sedalia and McLeansville have been renovated. Gibsonville is a new school built with bond money. Capacity at McLeansville is over 400 and they currently have 380 students. McLeansville is on the 2008 bond for an additional 126 seats, which will give them approximately 150 open seats. Capacity at Gibsonville is over 600 and they currently have about 450 students, which gives them approximately over 150 open seats. Sedalia has 480 students with a capacity of 420. They are overcrowded and years ago the student population south of the interstate was in the Southeast district. The southeast has had no major renovations in over 30 years. Alamance has 4 main buildings the older buildings date back to 148 and 1954. These buildings have never been renovated. It would not be cost effective to save these building. They are being tore down and replaced with a new building and that is why the cost is like building a new school because for the most part that is what they have to do. Eastern got a new Gibsonville Elementary school on the 2003 bond. Alamance student body is currently over 800 students. The new school is to be downsized to support at full capacity 700 students. An elementary school over 800 students is way too big to manage. The new elementary school was to support over 300 students from Alamance to finally get the school down to 500 students which is a much more manageable size. Southeast would be more than glad to share with Sedalia and pull those students south of the interstate back into the Southeast district which is the logical solution since Sedalia is the only Eastern district elementary that is overcrowded.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search