news-record.com

OPINION

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Ed Cone: Public safety starts with a committed electorate

Sunday, October 25, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

During the run-up to local elections, Joe Guarino of Greensboro runs a questionnaire for City Council candidates at his blog. The first question: "What, in your opinion, is the single most important activity in which municipal government engages?" Despite the boldface type, answers to that query sometimes get a little esoteric.

"Providing value back to the citizens for the investment they make through their hard-earned tax dollars," writes at-large challenger Danny Thompson.

"Serve the community," responds District 2 contender Nettie Coad.

Both are well-intentioned responses from well-respected candidates, but I find myself looking for something more specific, and that something is "public safety." (Several candidates got that one right; you can read the surveys at the eponymous Web site: http://guarino.typepad.com/guarino/city-council-candidate-questionnaires.)

Guarino's question, and the various responses to it, are not just dry political science. And they are especially important in this particular election year, during which a new city manager is starting the job. I say that not just because public safety is on my mind, although my north Greensboro neighborhood has been enduring a crime wave of an intensity and duration that feels vaguely apocalyptic. The larger context here involves an underlying factor behind the burglary spree -- the impact of tough economic times on the city and its people.

As the Greensboro Police Department said in an e-mail to neighbors after one person was apprehended, "we all know there are always two or three more suspects to take the arrested suspect's place." The cops, by the way, have been great. But there are too few of them, and they are stretched, too. Crime in New Irving Park gets a lot of headlines, but it's a citywide problem.

The economy does not in any way excuse the crooks. They bear full responsibility for their actions, but the break-ins are a reminder that the Great Recession is manifesting itself in all kinds of uncomfortable ways. We are well into an era of high unemployment, with no easy relief in sight, yet the ability of governments to help those in need is constrained by the same economic woes.

People are spending less, which means lower sales-tax revenue for the state. A prolonged housing slump -- economist Robert Shiller, who predicted the bust, says prices could lag for another five years -- might hobble local governments that rely on property taxes for much of their income.

For Greensboro, this crisis could be an opportunity. I don't mean to be a Pollyanna here -- they're called hard times for a reason -- but maybe this is the splash of cold water we need to wake us up. This city has got to focus on getting a few things right, right now. If public safety is Job One, then creating and maintaining an environment conducive to public safety -- that is, making the city a good place to do business and to live comfortably -- come pretty high on the list. At this point, everything else is noise.

To get where we need to go, the City Council must move past the infighting that has defined local politics for the past few years. The main actors in that drama have moved off-stage. Former police Chief David Wray has a good new job with the feds, running security for the Charlotte airport. His nemesis, former City Manager Mitchell Johnson is, well, the former city manager. Whatever messes remain to be cleaned up within the department must be addressed, but the emphasis needs to be squarely on the higher purpose of protecting the public.

Many of us spend less time thinking about local government than we do national and international affairs.

The latter are exciting, but it's the stuff closer to home that usually matters most in our day-to-day lives. Yet hardly anyone votes in our local primaries, and off-year elections can be thinly attended, too.

This is not the year to repeat that pattern. We need to get back to the basics of good governance. One way to send that message is to turn out on Election Day. If you don't take this stuff seriously, why should they?

Edward Cone (www.edcone.com, efcone@mindspring.com) writes a column for the News & Record on alternate Sundays.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

buzzman

October 25, 2009 - 9:14 am EDT

Citizens of Greensboro - If you want change, get out and vote for some new faces. Otherwise, your neighbors on the east side will continue to decide the course of city government.

sail

October 25, 2009 - 12:40 pm EDT

Ed Cone's column was spot on. Public safety is job one. Crime is increasing and people are on edge. Prioritize, focus and quality of execution is management 101. The city is floundering from poor leadership and city council infighting. We all have the power to stimulate change, we can’t continue down this road. Please, fellow citizens of Greensboro, Ed‘s column is a wake up call. We need to get out and vote for new leadership and skilled city council members. Our opportunity is now through early voting, or on Nov 3rd.

jbcarper

October 25, 2009 - 3:08 pm EDT

When you speak of public safety as being Job One, are you speaking of moving closer to a police state, or do you have actions in mind that will lead the existing population back towards being self-governing, law abiding citizens? A free society can only remain free as long as the citizens control their personal behaviors in such a was as to not endanger those around them. If we set aside, for the time being, laws that regulate personal, private behavior and concentrate on public, dangerous behaviors, perhaps we can find a solution to our problems.
Dealing with crimes of violence, robbery, burglary, drunken driving, and white collar fraud would take up enough time and money to keep a police force busy for years. How do we convince individuals that committing these types of crimes will be more painful than finding or creating a real job? If we can't convince them, we are heading ourselves towards a police state of ever increasing invasion of personal privacy.

Any candidate for local office should offer up their solutions to this problem. If all he/she can offer is more of the same, why make a change?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 43°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 0° L: 37°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search