news-record.com

NEWS

Victims, families outraged by inmates' release

Tuesday, October 20, 2009
(Updated 3:08 pm)

RALEIGH (AP) — The man who shot Pam Hurley's mother to death during a convenience store robbery nearly 25 years ago was supposed to spend the rest of his life in prison. Instead, because of a quirk in North Carolina law, he and 19 other violent criminals will be released next week, most without supervision from even a parole officer.

"It's a nightmare; an absolute nightmare," Hurley said today. "These people are going to be released. They'll be free to move and go wherever they want to go. And that's a scary thing."

Her mother's killer, Bobby Bowden, set in motion the court case that will free some felons sentenced to life terms in the 1970s unless officials can find a way to keep them locked up.

Bowden argued a state law from that decade defined a life sentence as 80 years. It was changed a few years later, but Bowden said it was in effect when he was sentenced, meaning that with good behavior credits and other rule changes, he had served his time.

The felons have been denied parole repeatedly over the years. The state Correction Department estimates about 100 more prisoners could be released in the coming months.

State Supreme Court justices all but begged prosecutors during a hearing last month to give them any reason to say no, but they could not. Lawmakers say there's nothing they can do, though federal prosecutors are looking into the cases to determine if there is any way to keep the prisoners in custody.

Family members and victims are bracing themselves for the release. Some are too scared to talk. For others, shock has given way to anger, then sadness, as they relive details of the days their fathers or mothers were killed or raped.

Hurley understands victims are scared — she's worried about identifying herself. But the issue is too important to keep quiet, she said.

"This animal took the lives of two innocent people and should not be released," she said. "We thought when he was sentenced he would spend the rest of his natural life in prison. But he's out after 33 years, and Mom's dead."

Hurley, now 51, was 17 when her mother, Norma Jean Ehrhart, went to a convenience store in Fayetteville to buy milk and bread. Instead, she walked in on a robbery; the clerk was already dead and Ehrhart was shot. She died en route to the hospital.

Hurley's sister, Michelle Knieriem, was a 15-year-old returning from the beach that morning. When she arrived at the apartment, her sister met her with the news.

"It was unbelievable," said Knieriem, 49.

The killing, she said, tore apart her family. Bowden's pending release is bringing the four siblings back together.

"I can't believe this is happening," she said. "We've been told by corrections that it's a done deal, that they're going to release him. We're in disbelief that they're going to let this guy go."

The inmates about to be released are worried too, said state appellate defender Staples Hughes, who worked on Bowden's appeal. He said Bowden and his family don't want to talk to reporters.

"They understand that there's anger, and they're not looking to antagonize anyone," he said. The victims and survivors "are all people who living in the aftermath of a violent crime and they have every right to be angry. It's like opening an old wound for them. ... I cannot personally measure the depth of their anger and hurt and pain because I've not been there."

That's scant comfort for Carolyn Ashburn, who promised her mother she would make sure James C. Johnson stayed behind bars. So each January since 1986 — the year her mother died and Johnson became eligible for parole — she has driven about 100 miles each way to testify that authorities should not release the man who shot and killed her father as her mother and a pawn shop customer watched.

"They might as well open the door and let them all out," she said. "What's the matter with North Carolina?"

Ashburn, now 73, still lives in the same house in Wadeville where 72-year-old John Farley Hall was shot on Feb. 19, 1975. She stayed because her father would not have wanted anyone to run her out of the family home.

"We just ain't that kind of people," she said. "As a matter of fact, I feel closer to him here."

Not everyone shares her fearlessness.

A Kinston woman raped by Steven C. Wilson when she was 9 says she is worried about his pending release. Wilson, convicted in 1978 of kidnapping and first-degree rape, lured her into his car by telling her that her sister wanted to talk to her.

"He locked the doors and said, if you scream, I'm going to kill you," the woman recalled. He was caught because, even through her tears and fear, she remembered his license plate number.

Her family never discussed the rape, and she never received counseling. Still, the woman, who turned 44 on Tuesday, will graduate from college in December. She's married, though separated, and has a 17-year-old daughter. The Associated Press is not naming her because she is a victim of sexual assault.

She said she has thought about the rape daily since she heard Wilson was being released. She didn't think about it every day before that, she said, because "I knew he wasn't getting out."

Accompanying Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

holland4

October 20, 2009 - 3:23 pm EDT

life sentence = 80 years = 25 years

By that sort of arithmetic, that means for each whole day of not sticking a fellow prisoner your sentence is reduced by over two additional days. It's mathematics for guilt-ridden liberals.

kikablue

October 20, 2009 - 4:07 pm EDT

This is BS let them out when the dead come back to life.

bottechia

October 20, 2009 - 4:08 pm EDT

Where are these criminals going to work or live?
This is a very serious situation not just for the victims but everyone in the state of N.C.

admiralcsn

October 20, 2009 - 5:00 pm EDT

The victims and families of victims have every right to be outraged; the only reason these felons are being released is because of a piece of legal chicanery, not anything they've done to earn their freedom. As for Staples Hughes, he should be ashamed of himself for his role in causing this horrific miscarriage of justice, because he will bear much of the responsibility if any of these inmates being released because of his actions kills or rapes someone else...and some of them very likely will.

wize64

October 20, 2009 - 5:14 pm EDT

Citizens of North Carolina, I encourage you to bear arms! Career politicians could care less about your safety and well being. Aim center mass!

Thomas G Smothers Jr

October 20, 2009 - 6:22 pm EDT

We should be "Releasing" excess state workers, not career criminals. Nice move Governor Perdue!!

ThoseSamePeople

October 20, 2009 - 7:30 pm EDT

"state appellate defender Staples Hughes"...If he had lost a loved one I am sure his response would be very very very different. This country is really screwed up, and I am appalled that this is happening.

judgeandjury

October 20, 2009 - 9:54 pm EDT

I want to say this to everyone that has posted a comment in regards to this nightmare come true. Yes I am a survivor of one of these psychos being released and I encourage you all to direct your anger towards the idiots that made this decision and ensure that they don't serve another term in office or on the bench of any court!!!!!! Because of this stupid mistake I will have to live in fear for myself and my family for the rest of my life!!!! But trust me when I say this and I hope those criminals read this I won't be a victim again and I will be prepared to defend myself come October 29th when they are released and I encourage all citizens to do the same, an eye for and eye and a life for a life!!!!! But to answer some of the questions that have been pointed out, form what I was told by the victim rights advicate (funny huh looks like I have no rights) these psychos will be released to go where ever they want and live where ever they want.......maybe next door to any one of you. So think about that. The thing is what employer in their right mind would give any of them a job, so are they going to be forced to result to crime again? What about the rapest if anyone has ever seen any proven studies that say these people can be rehabilitated PLEASE let me know because I've never heard or read anything that says different. So what the hell were these idiots in office thinking? So I like the other commenter will be bearing arms because I have been forced to so!!! I just hope that if anyone else is vitimized by one of these psychos that the victim sues the state for billions and I hope I get called for that jury because I know how I'm voting!!!!! Take a deep breath Triad because I have been told by the officials in the victims rights office that several psychos are set to come back here for sure!!!!!

holland4

October 20, 2009 - 10:36 pm EDT

I wish you much comfort and peace, J&J. I, too, would be furious if I were in your shoes. I'm already mad as it is, but I can't imagine being in your situation. While I have never been the victim of anything worse than a larceny and a hit and run (and those weren't fun at all), my aged father was robbed while pumping gas several years ago. I applied for my concealed carry permit as a result and my Glock goes with me everywhere it's legally allowed. Its use would be an absolute last result, but I plan to die of old age instead of at the hands of a thug who can't get his act together.

kamoore28

October 20, 2009 - 10:45 pm EDT

I feel sorry for all the victims who are now being revictimized because these offenders are being released. However, I would like an explanation how the law that was in place in the 1970's termed life as 80 years. Additionally, how can these offenders be earning good time and whatever else that is reducing their life terms to 20 to 30 years when they are still committing offenses behind bars? I thought offenders got additional time for misbehavior behind bars or earned credits got taken away for misbehavior behind bars. I would love sto see how many of these offenders will be back in custody after 6 months to year for other crimes. These offenders are being released with most likely no home to go to, no money, and no job prospects and are expected to survive. I feel for any community to will be receiving one of these violent offenders.

Interested

October 21, 2009 - 6:46 am EDT

Assuming that the average man lived to age 72, and that each convict was 18, a sentence of 80 years should have ensured that those sentenced to life would die in prison and, if not, would be too feeble when released to be a threat. The problem stems from additional legislation that actually allowed people with life sentences to earn time off for good behavior.

rondab

October 21, 2009 - 1:46 am EDT

I suppose next, we will WELCOME the Gitmo prisoners to Greensboro. I am sorry for the unnecessary fear the victims families will now live through. They have endured enough already. Thank you Ms. Liberal Perdue. I've
always heard what goes around, also comes around. She should be rmoved from the office she fraudulently won.

northoftheboro

October 21, 2009 - 4:47 am EDT

As this miscarriage of justice is now making national headlines, it seems that North Carolina's elected officials and judicial system have succeeded in once again making N.C. a national embarrassment. This is what happens when a state ceases to be a "two-party" government, with one-party having a stranglehold on power for the bulk of the last century and a half. Elections have consequences!

Interested

October 21, 2009 - 7:04 am EDT

Actually, a miscarriage of justice refers to someone who is wrongfully convicted of a crime they did not commit. And as there are both republicans and democrats in the state legislature, there is clearly a two-party government. The party that has a "stranglehold" was duly elected. The problem here is a legislature that doesn't consider ALL the consequences of the legislation they pass - they consider the consequences they desire, but how often do they ask themselves "What will the unintended consequences be?"

Doug Johnson

October 21, 2009 - 6:09 am EDT

ronda,
Be careful if the liberals in Raleigh think they can get a vote, this may happen.
Nothhofboro, the liberals have ran this state for over a 100 years.

Interested

October 21, 2009 - 6:56 am EDT

I understand anger with this situation. I understand anger with the legislators that created this situation. What I do not understand is anger with the judicial system. These men and women are doing what they are REQUIRED to do by laws enacted by your (or your parents) elected legislators. How many have complained about Easley, Perdue, Allred, etc, doing what they wanted to do and not abiding by state law? You don't get to pick and choose which laws are important and therefore must be adhered to.

camelz

October 21, 2009 - 7:46 am EDT

I suggest, in the spirit of love for one's fellow man, that anyone playing a hand in the release of this scum invite one of them into their homes - let them live, eat, sleep in their homes - be a part of their family. That would include the layers representing this group - the various courts (including the State Supremes) - the Governor - ANYONE that played a role in this abomination. This is an insult to every citizen of this state.

tarheel19906

October 21, 2009 - 9:09 am EDT

What I dont understand is how someone can go from beig on death row.....changed to life in prison....then released back in society. My opinion is the only way they should leave prison is in a wooden box. In my household we have alot of guns, so to the ones being released or for any criminal reading this....IF you plan to break into my home, attempt to harm myself, my children or a member of my family....please carry identification, so it will be easier to identify your body, because I will drop you in a minute without giving it a second thought. If the government will not do its job to protect citizens, then you make my choice easier. Since they didnt ask for my opinion, the only option I have is, when I vote next month and the next general election in 2 years, vote against everyone in office (except BJ Barnes) in hopes of getting new faces and ideas in office who do care about the people who put them there.

proc219

October 21, 2009 - 1:48 pm EDT

I THINK THIS IS REALLY SAD HOW NC RELEAESE THE MOST DANGEROUS CRIMINALS BACK IN SOCIETY,WHEN YOU HAVE A LOT NON-VIOLENT INMATES WHO SERVES EXCESSIVE TIME FOR THE ACTS THEY COMMITED.ESPECIALLY DWI CASES.YOU HAVE INMATES WHO WERE CAUGHT DRIVING DRUNK THAT HAVE NEVER HAD AN ACCIDENT OR KILLED SOMEONE DO MAXIMUM TIME,AND THE ONES THAT WERE 2-3 TIMES THE LEGAL LIMIT,AND WHO HAS ACTUALLY KILLED SOMEONE DO LESS THAN 3YRS TIME,EVERYONE SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS,BUT THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS UNFAIR WHEN SENTENCING INMATES.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search