news-record.com

NEWS

Creating jobs isn't so easy, council finds

Sunday, October 18, 2009
(Updated 5:55 am)

— It’s become an election 2009 mantra.

Jobs, jobs, jobs.

Every City Council candidate wants them. Hardly anyone has an idea how to get them.

“I realized after getting elected, it’s not that easy,” District 3 candidate Zack Matheny said.

With a high unemployment rate hanging over the county and the national economy continuing to sputter, new jobs may be elusive right now.

But local leaders say there are things Greensboro’s council hopefuls can do to make the city business-friendly and primed for an economic upturn.

It starts with being good at their jobs.

Businesses that are looking to relocate appreciate a well-run government, analysts said.

“You want stability. You want supportiveness,” said Rob Bencini, an economic development consultant who formerly worked for Guilford County.

At-large candidate Gary Nixon, who moved to Greensboro in 1980 to expand his engineering firm, agrees.

“The police and city manager debates dragged on too long,” he said. “Those type of things need to be taken care of to encourage private investment.”

Leaders have also stressed the importance of incentives as one of the few direct impacts City Council can have on job creation.

Most candidates say they support them. The sitting council approved three economic incentives in the past term.

At-large council candidate Danny Thompson would like to see the city build a reserve fund to provide incentives to businesses that would bolster the region as an “epicenter for product distribution” on the East Coast.

He would like to see the city cut 2 percent from its bottom line and raise 2 percent in revenue to pay for it.

“If we are going to play this incentive game, let’s play to win,” Thompson said.

Some candidates, including several council members, have expressed interest in establishing an incentives program for small business like the one developed by Guilford County, which gives some property owners who make improvements a break on property tax payments.

But some candidates have said the incentives should be linked to job creation.

“I embrace that,” said Mayor Yvonne Johnson, a candidate for re-election. “Our small businesses are important.”

City leaders don’t have to reinvent the wheel, some said. They can just do a better job promoting and enhancing what they’ve got, such as Greensboro’s small-business loan program.

“The city doesn’t do enough aggressive advertising for the programs they have,” Raymond Trapp, a local real estate professional and chairman of the zoning commission.

To that end, District 1 Councilwoman T. Dianne Bellamy-Small has asked the city’s economic development staff to provide educational materials to help inform businesses what is available to them.

City leaders could continue to promote Greensboro’s center city, business leaders said. A hip downtown will attract and retain a creative class of entrepreneurs.

That may not have a direct impact on jobs, but drawing those types of people will be important to the future of employment, Bencini said.

“We’ve got to have an environment that attracts and keeps those types of people,” said Pat Danahy, president and CEO of the Greensboro Partnership.

Meanwhile, the sitting City Council is making plans to work better with business leaders toward broader community goals.

The council has asked the city staff to organize a business summit and questionnaire to open communication — an idea promoted by City Councilwoman Trudy Wade.

“We need to develop a plan with measurable goals based on that feedback, and monitor ongoing progress,” Wade said.

 

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

 

THE CANDIDATES' TAKES

Here’s a portion of what the at-large candidates have to say about economic development and jobs:

Marikay Abuzuaiter: The city needs to do more to promote small businesses and help them be healthy.

Sandra Anderson Groat: The current system of economic development teams are working well. The council is sustaining by having ready infrastructure and hosting a business summit.

Robbie Perkins: City Council needs to provide a strategic vision, ensure the city functions well, continually invest in infrastructure, and promote planning efforts like the downtown revitalization and the aerotropolis plan.

Gary Nixon: The council needs to be more stable and give more incentives to small business to hire locally.

Danny Thompson: Greensboro should provide more incentives to be a hub for industry.

Nancy Vaughan: The city should pursue grants to make areas of the city ready for new business and seek regional solutions for long-term infrastructure needs.

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

rmacz

October 18, 2009 - 9:50 am EDT

Lower taxes, goverment saleries, elect conservative politicians that have business back grounds instead of community service, i.e. Obama. Folks, when these politicians have have to hire firms, talk to other people, they do not know what to do themselves.

roadhouse158

October 18, 2009 - 3:40 pm EDT

Um...I love the admission that creating jobs isn't that easy. Of course he was talking about as a politician. You see. Politicians DO NOT create jobs. Governments aren't producers. Only businesses create jobs. I don't know why elected officials, at every level, think they are the reason good things happen. If we have great law enforcement, great roads, and consistent low tax rates, plenty of jobs would come. Stop paying people to come here. That is ridiculous. You have to raise taxes, or not lower them, to get the revenue to do that. This keeps other businesses from coming here, and keeps some local start-ups from happening. Everything government does has adverse effects somewhere else. Just focus on services that you are supposed to do...I.E., Law Enforcement, roads, education, and leave the economy to the consumers and producers.

brian444

October 19, 2009 - 1:38 am EDT

It's no wonder these city council clowns are strictly small-time. They should borrow a page from Washington. The important thing is not to focus on creating jobs, which can be measured, but on creating OR SAVING jobs. If you're in the business of saving jobs, you can claim to have saved them no matter how high unemployment is. "Oh, we're at 15% unemployment? It's a good thing we spent those billions of dollars because they saved [insert some number here] jobs, which would have raised it to 19%." That's how the big boys do it.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search