news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Franklin Graham temporarily gives up retirement money

Thursday, October 8, 2009
(Updated 10:24 am)

CHARLOTTE (AP) — Evangelist Franklin Graham has temporarily given up future contributions to his retirement plans from the two ministries where he's the CEO, saying his total compensation "looks terrible."

The Charlotte Observer reported today that Graham receives two full-time salaries and two retirement packages — one each from the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Samaritan's Purse. His total compensation from them last year was $1.2 million — $535,000 from Samaritan's Purse, based in Boone, and $669,000 from Charlotte-based BGEA.

Graham acknowledged last week that his compensation total "looks terrible" and that "people won't understand it."

The newspaper said Graham, 57, asked the heads of the two ministries' compensation committees Tuesday to cut off contributions to his retirement plan "for the time being." He sent a memo about the request to employees Wednesday.

Spokesman Mark DeMoss said Samaritan's Purse will suspend payments for 2010 because it has funded Graham's retirement for 2009. He said Graham will receive no retirement payments for 2009 from the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

Most of Graham's compensation in 2008 came from accelerated contributions to his retirement, both he and his boards said. Graham received no retirement his first five-plus years at Samaritan's Purse and first year at the BGEA.

The evangelist and his wife, Jane, "are grateful to the (boards) for these contributions to my future retirement, but in the current economic climate I don't feel good accepting such retirement make-up provisions," he said in a statement e-mailed to the Observer.

DeMoss said "the (BGEA) compensation committee believes the overall compensation approved for Franklin was appropriate (and did not ask him to alter it), but Franklin believes the impression given by these somewhat unusual reporting procedures is not a good one. If or when the economic situation improves significantly he will consider accepting contributions to his retirement plan."

Also, $300,000 of what he received last year from BGEA was deferred retirement money that had been committed and reported over three previous years, Graham and the board said. Under new Internal Revenue Service rules, the money had to be re-reported as a lump sum in 2008, the year Graham became vested.

Even with that $300,000 plus accrued interest taken out, Graham's compensation at BGEA rose 21 percent in 2008, from $250,000 to $303,000. The median increase for CEOs at the nation's biggest charities in 2008 was 7 percent, according to an annual survey released last week by the Journal of Philanthropy.

BGEA laid off 55 people in February.

At Samaritan's Purse, Graham's compensation grew about 3 percent from 2007 to 2008.

Graham said the $300,000 in deferred retirement he had to re-report gives a false impression of how much his compensation has grown. He said he worried that it could put off donors and other supporters of his ministries.

"Nothing's been done that's bad," he said. "It's a perception issue, but in the nonprofit world, you have to be careful of perceptions."

Instead of adopting the deferred retirement plan at BGEA, he said, it would have been better "to take a bonus every year."

But Graham said he has always felt overpaid. "I enjoy and love what I do," he said. "It's not a job, it's a calling. I'd do it for nothing."

___

Information from: The Charlotte Observer, http://www.charlotte.com

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

westronandnan@aol.com

October 8, 2009 - 9:49 am EDT

I was taken aback when I saw these figures a few days ago. And, to be paid two full-time salaries when it is impossible to hold two full-time jobs just seems inappropriate and suspicious to me.

Looks like Franklin's a little more greedy than his dad was.

thirstytarheel

October 8, 2009 - 11:28 am EDT

Its disturbing what these big time preachers take in. I don't think they need to be on welfare, but do they really need all the money the receive from their followers, especially when its coming from a lot people who can't afford to be sending money in. I've always wondered if the preachers give back a significant amount to the cause. Its incredible to watch christian TV and hear these people asking viewers to "plant a seed" and get a hundred fold return. Its as if they're selling blessings. Of course no one is holding a gun to anyone's head to send money in This is the USA and there's no law against being stupid. So go ahead send your money to these folks on TV so that can continue to beg for more money.

dandyseniors

October 8, 2009 - 11:35 am EDT

If he would do the job for nothing, why doesn't he at least cut his salary in half? That would still be too much.

DiserningMind

October 9, 2009 - 2:01 pm EDT

I agree. For that matter, if Franklin would really do this job for nothing, then why doesn't he at least try it for awhile.... perhaps while the ministry monetary donations are down. Surely he has made (or his accountant has made) enough financial investments for him, in the U.S. proper and Alaska, to sustain him and his family. I don't recall a scripture that says one should go out into the world, spread the "Word" and make millions of dollars. Jesus' words, re. the sermon on the mount, was given to change minds and hearts, not to line someone wallet. I'm sure people give donations with the expectation that their money will be used explicitly for those who are in need and not to excessively supply someone's bank account and/or retirement fund. I guess this is just par and why should we have expected more, especially in light of what previous evangelists have secretly... privately done with funds given trustingly to them.

elsoots

October 8, 2009 - 1:02 pm EDT

I praise him for what he is doing other CEO wouldn't do it. And poeple give money for his misister want God to look at what good thay have done. God dose not want you give he to make you look good. Most poeple give for have thay are doing .

elsoots

October 8, 2009 - 1:13 pm EDT

The board of these places give him his money if you want to say something about it call on them about it and you don't now what is dad the lastt year he was a the head of it. Would you give up your retaimtment.

kbrown98462

October 8, 2009 - 2:34 pm EDT

Greed is a sin. I believe it was sinful for him and other "People of God" to make and keep so much money. It's shameful and sinful.

Gymnaseum

October 8, 2009 - 11:07 pm EDT

Are we really surprised? Do we think his father was not being feted, too? Maybe not the degree but I am sure in similar kinds of back-room calls.
Absolute jokes.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: LIGHT RAIN
  • Current Temperature: 50°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 54° L: 46°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search