news-record.com

NEWS

State pays $3.9 million for wrongful conviction

Friday, October 2, 2009
(Updated 8:11 am)

RALEIGH (MCT) The State Bureau of Investigation has agreed to a $3.9 million settlement with former death row inmate Alan Gell to end his lawsuit accusing the SBI of fabricating evidence and obstructing justice, according to documents made public Thursday.

Officials at the SBI could not cite a bigger settlement made on behalf of the agency. The state also spent $731,062.40 to defend the lawsuit.

Gell, who spent nine years behind bars , said the settlement amount is a concession of his innocence and the SBI's wrongdoing. He was in jail on a car theft charge when the murder for which he was wrongly convicted occurred.

''I see it as an admission of guilt" from the SBI, Gell said in a recent interview.

The settlement was made on behalf of SBI special agent Dwight Ransome. He was the lead investigator into the 1995 killing of Allen Ray Jenkins, a retired truck driver in Aulander, about 120 miles east of Raleigh.

According to a case summary by the agent's own lawyer, Ransome had decided that Gell was guilty early on, despite having statements from 17 independent witnesses who saw Jenkins alive after Gell was jailed on unrelated charges.

Ransome recommended Gell be charged with murder while failing to inform the prosecutor of a host of evidence favorable to Gell: taped telephone calls, a failed polygraph test and the 17 witness statements.

Instead, he built the case on the stories of two drug-abusing 15-year-old girls whose stories changed every time they were interviewed or testified. The two pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and testified against Gell; no one else has been prosecuted.

SBI Director Robin Pendergraft said Thursday that Ransome has been transferred to an administrative job in Raleigh and will not conduct any more investigations. His salary, $72,849, is unchanged.

''It was in the best interest of the SBI for him to be transferred," Pendergraft said.

Ransome declined to be interviewed.

Fallout from the lawsuit

Gell spent four of his nine years behind bars on death row. A judge ordered a new trial because prosecutors withheld evidence favorable to Gell. A jury quickly acquitted him at a retrial in 2004.

Gell sued two prosecutors from the Attorney General's Office, their supervisor, the Aulander chief of police and Ransome.

The prosecutors were dismissed from the case because they enjoy absolute immunity from prosecution or lawsuits stemming from their official actions. The town of Aulander paid Gell $93,750 to settle the case in 2007.

The SBI paid $500,000 to Gell, while two insurance companies paid $3.4 million.

One of Gell's lawyers said there was little investigation into Ransome's conduct until the civil lawsuit.

''This was the investigation that should have been done before the second trial ever took place," David Rudolf said. "My hope is when the people at the SBI look at the money and the facts of what happened, they'll see it's in the interest of justice and their own self interest to avoid this in the future."

The SBI reviewed the case against Gell in 2003 and found it "was fairly well documented." Attorney General Roy Cooper then decided to retry Gell, who was acquitted.

Pendergraft said Thursday that Ransome violated policy by failing to document critical events in the case.

Review of Ransome

Cooper said Thursday that he has hired Chris Swecker, a retired assistant FBI director, to review cases handled by Ransome and to suggest changes in policies and techniques to avoid such cases.

Cooper declined to say whether he thought Gell is innocent of Jenkins' murder. He said Gell's case was not equivalent to the Duke lacrosse case, in which he unequivocally declared the three defendants innocent.

''The Duke case was a clear case, very unusual," he said. "There was no crime committed. ... In the Gell case, the prosecutors relied on two eyewitnesses, and medical and scientific evidence."

Gell, 35, is serving a five-year prison sentence for indecent liberties for having sex with a 15-year-old girlfriend after he was freed from prison. Gell's lawyer used part of the settlement to set up a trust that has been supporting the young woman and their son. Once Gell is released from prison, he will receive $7,857.28 each month for the rest of his life.

The settlement was signed in April; the amount was unsealed in federal court Thursday.

David Ray, the son of Allen Ray Jenkins, sat through both trials and is convinced of Gell's innocence. He said he was ecstatic over the news of the settlement.

''I hope the SBI will discipline Dwight Ransome," Ray said. "Why does he still have a job?"

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

MiMi

October 2, 2009 - 6:13 am EDT

THERE IS NO LAW......and there are so many things out there to prove just this.....people who should not be in jail or prison just because they are pressured or falsely accused by the people who are suppose to protect the citizens.....I tell you there is no judicial system any longer.....GOD is not happy with this country....and HE is just watching and waiting, waiting and watching people as they put him aside and do not do as should be done....
So much has happened with this country and a lot of it is due to the people who are suppose to protect the citizens....when is this crap going to stop? We had better get back in touch with GOD before it is too late....we had better ask that the HOLY SPIRIT touch each and every one of us and bring back standards, values, morals, faith, justice, truth, law and everyone......I repeat everyone should be held accountable for what they do....this country has gone to hell in a handbasket and it seems like no one cares......wake up AMERICA before it is too late.....

Doug Johnson

October 2, 2009 - 6:19 am EDT

Good for Gell, if you recall, he was a victim of NC good ole boy policy.
Much like the Duke case, liberals at work.
And do not forget, Hugh Webster, who was found not guilty!
Remember, Hugh was front page news on ever liberal paper, tv and radio in NC.
When he was found not guilty, maybe two news sources in NC carried it.
The reason, I got was we must have missed it.
Real reason, the Raleigh Mafia, wanted it suppressed!

Interested

October 2, 2009 - 7:37 am EDT

How do you figure the Mr. Gells situation was a result of "liberals at work?" It is nonsense like this that leads one to ignore all your posts.

truth

October 2, 2009 - 8:46 am EDT

This is dumb. Ransome gets to keep his $72k a year job while my tax money goes to pay 3.5 million to a pedophile? Ransome, and likely others, should have been civilly and criminally liable for their crimes. Gell should have his 3.5 million settlement used to pay the costs of his current imprisonment for a sex crime.

Crimedog

October 2, 2009 - 12:01 pm EDT

If I've learned anything after 30+ years of law enforcement is this! MOST OF THE COURTS IN NORTH CAROLINA ARE NOT INTERESTED IN TRUTH. THE ONLY THING MOST JUDGES AND COURTS SEEK IS JUSTICE. AND JUSTICE HAS TO BE PURCHASED. IT IS PURCHASED FROM HIGHLY PAID LAWYERS THAT COME WITH LAW DEGREES BUT WITHOUT HEARTS. JUDGES THAT COME WITH ELECTIONS BUT WITHOUT COMPASSION, AND SOMETIMES JURIES WITH IDEAS, BUT NO COMMON SENSE. THE MAIN THOUGHT IS "IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!" With a systems like this, many guilties go free and many innocents are sent to prison. Why? "It's all about the money, and the price to purchase justice". The Dog's outa here.
Crimedog

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search