news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Perdue veto dead solid perfect

Tuesday, September 15, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

Gov. Bev Perdue has sent an ill-considered bill that would have called for more secrecy among state lawmakers to precisely where it belongs: the recycling bin.

The governor rightly vetoed the bill, which never should have made it to her desk in the first place.

"These are the people's documents," the governor said last week of the shameless attempt to keep the public's business away from public scrutiny.

The bill would have classified as confidential any new document an agency created in response to a legislator's request for information to help draft a bill. It also would have shielded from public view any constituent's request for a lawmaker to propose a bill.

In effect, the proposed law would have made it harder for the public to know who is requesting a bill, why and how he or she might gain from it.

Lawmakers lamely defended the provisions as protecting the personal information of constituents. As if that weren't outrageous enough, the bill would have imposed criminal penalties on any executive branch employee who violated the bill's confidentiality requirements. Similar penalties for legislative employees were conspicuously absent.

It was the governor's first veto in office and only the 10th since the General Assembly restored governors' veto powers in 1997. And it was a good place to start.

In response, legislative leaders backed off on calling a special session to attempt to override the governor's veto. That only would have added insult to injury by incurring taxpayer expense for a dubious cause. "After consultation with (Senate President Pro Tem Marc) Basnight and with various members of the House of Representatives, we have agreed that the expense and time required for a veto session are not justified in this case," House Speaker Joe Hackney said in a written statement.

Nor was this bill justified from the start. Given all of the recent skullduggery in Raleigh, lawmakers should have known better.

They ought to be shining more light, not adding shadows.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Dogwood

September 15, 2009 - 2:27 pm EDT

If anyone has time, could a quote from Guilford Rep. Harrison and a quote from Guilford Rep. Blust be sought? Bill H104 passed with 107 votes. A democrat and a republican rarely agree on such an egregious notion. Was it sneaked in at last minute, end of long session, putting one thousand bills together and voted on without reading?
Blunt is honey-mooning so I excuse him for being powerless to stop Bill H104. Or maybe not. Both Harrison and Blunt are legal scholars of the USA Constitution and the North Carolina Constitution. Was it too much trouble to answer questions or was the reasoning due to abuse from question askers? Once upon a time North Carolina was a good government state. Bill H104 is troubling. Leaders need to defend their reasoning and their vote.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search