news-record.com

NEWS

A&T grad a guest for Obama's speech

Thursday, September 10, 2009
(Updated 8:10 am)

GREENSBORO — Nathan Wilkes, a Greensboro native, sat two rows behind the first lady Wednesday night to hear President Barack Obama discuss a concern close to his heart: health care insurance reform.

A new system could mean that Wilkes and his wife, Sonji, could stop worrying about the high cost of health insurance for their 6-year-old son, who has a blood disorder.

“It’ll relieve us of a huge burden about worrying about caps and the bad practices of the insurers,” said Nathan Wilkes, who attended the speech as an invited guest. “We’ve been under their yoke for so many years. We live with the threat on a daily basis that something might happen.”

When the couple learned in 2003 that their son, Thomas, had hemophilia, a disorder that doesn’t allow blood to clot normally, the doctor asked them one question: “Do you have good health insurance?”

Nathan Wilkes, a 1996 electrical engineering graduate of N.C. A&T, had a comprehensive insurance plan from the telecommunications company for which he designs and builds data networks.

But Thomas’ annual medication costs are between $500,000 and $750,000 a year.

He maxed out the $1 million cap Nathan Wilkes’ insurer placed on subscribers. The family used $800,000 of another $1 million capped policy. They now have coverage with a $6 million cap.

For the couple, getting excellent health care has not been the problem.

“It’s been figuring out how to pay the bedeviling cost of health insurance,” Sonji Wilkes said.

She said the family has paid up to $20,000 for a year’s worth of health insurance. But she said most families cannot afford to do so. That’s why the couple advocates for a health care system that is affordable to all and doesn’t prohibit pre-existing conditions.

“This is the cause of his life now,” Sonji Wilkes said of her husband. “I can’t imagine that any other parent wouldn’t do what they have to do to care for their child.”

Nathan Wilkes’ mother, Donna Wilkes of Greensboro, said she’s very proud of the work her son and daughter-in-law are doing.

“Both of them have been involved in community service through the Greensboro Youth Council and it’s just an extension of this and it’s taught them a whole lot,” she said.

The high school sweethearts totaled nearly 2,000 hours each of community service. Sonji Wilkes said they learned public speaking and leadership skills, as well as the way municipalities work.

The family is still heavily involved in their Colorado community, the National Hemophilia Foundation and the Hemophilia Federation of America.

Nathan Wilkes ran unsuccessfully for the Colorado state Senate in 2008.

On Aug. 15, Nathan Wilkes introduced Obama at a town hall meeting in Grand Junction, Colo., a five-hour drive from his home in Englewood.

After the meeting, Obama spoke with each family member and received a high five from Thomas.

“The meeting was brief, but meaningful,” she said.

So is the family’s national fight for health insurance reform.

“First and foremost, I’m a mother,” she said. “It’s all about doing what you can for your children. “While it’s really awesome to be able to represent Greensboro and to be a voice for health care forum, it’s really about taking care of Thomas.”

Contact Dioni L. Wise at 373-7090 or dioni.wise@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

The Associated Press

Photo Caption: President Barack Obama spoke about health care Wednesday to a joint session of Congress.

Additional Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

bigwill

September 10, 2009 - 9:49 am EDT

Let's be real about this people. Do you honestly believe that this new healthcare system can work? Where and how could the government even afford it? This is only just one person that is spending close to a million per year on their issue. Just imagine the rest of the people that would need to spend these amounts or more for their healthcare. Do the math, it would be impossible to support. There are already other countries using systems similiar to this and they are running out of money now. Don't let a good speech decieve your common sense factor. I guarantee there will be just as many problems with this as the private insurance has now. Just because something is free doesn't mean it is better. I receive "free" services from the VA, but having to wait 1-3 months to be seen is not worth the free price either. Usually, I just pay the regular insurance to see a private doctor to keep from having to wait. This will be no different.

Highmiles

September 10, 2009 - 10:28 am EDT

Very well put.
President Obama referenced the Canadian plan, take a look at how poorly it is working. The Canadians are coming here for treatment.

Laura

September 10, 2009 - 10:36 am EDT

That is another lie manufactured by the insurance companies and their Republicans. It happens, but not that often. When is the last time you met a Canadian in an emergency room or doctors office. Just as many Americans near the border go to Canada for health care too. I know because I used to live in upstate NY. Lots of people would cross the border for cheaper health care, or because they liked a particular doctor or clinic.

Panacea

September 10, 2009 - 10:39 am EDT

That is a myth. Canadians are not rushing to America for health care. They are satisfied with their health care. Sure, there are problems with their system--no system is perfect. However, there is no evidence that Canadians are coming to the US. What hospitals are they going to? How much of their GDP do Canadians spend in the US? What procedures are they getting here that they can't get in the US?

I had a friend in college who was Canadian. She DROVE 8 hours back home to Canada to get surgery on her knee. She could have gotten it locally but didn't. She didn't want to pay out of pocket for expensive American care when she could get the same care for free at home.

American

September 10, 2009 - 2:01 pm EDT

Highmiles, my wife and I had company last weekend, a good friend of mine who is from Canada and now is an American citizen, and his visiting father, who lives in Montreal. I asked both of them about their healthcare system and about comments like yours, which we all hear so often. "That's not true." they told me." That's a lie. It's very expensive in America, and our care is free. What does happen is Canadian doctors migrate to America because they can make much more money, so we are losing doctors to America. We have good care up here but need more doctors to stay."

bigwill

September 11, 2009 - 9:12 am EDT

If Canadian doctors are doing that, I could only imagine how the doctors in the US would react.

Panacea

September 10, 2009 - 10:28 am EDT

I do believe it can work. Comprehensive health care reform that eliminates waste and reduces overhead will save billions per year in unnecessary costs that have nothing to do with caring for patients. Use of best practices will eliminate billions more being spent on unnecessary procedures that are no more effective than conservative treatment with medication, exercise, and diet. Right now, providers are given an incentive to treat with diagnostic tests when the doctor already knows what is wrong because he gets paid for tests not talking to the patient. They are given an incentive to do pricey procedures rather than counsel on healthy habits and explain how medications work.

And the new health care system will NOT be free. You will still have to pay an insurance premium for it. The purpose is NOT to make health care free. The purpose is to make it affordable, but cutting out the fat in administrative costs, and reducing costs incurred by unnecessary procedures, tests, and medications.

And, gotta tell ya bigwill, I have to wait 2-3 months to be seen by my private physician right now. That is because there is a lack of primary care providers.

My common sense and my experience working within the system tell me we need major changes. You don't see it because clearly you don't have to struggle with major health problems. A lot of chronic illnesses could be better managed by greater access to a primary care doctor who can actually take the time to TALK to his patients. But managed care does not allow doctors to do this: seven minutes and it is off to the next patient.

That has to change. Don't let your fear of change blind you to the real fact we can make changes for the better.

bigwill

September 10, 2009 - 1:33 pm EDT

Somebody elses chronic illness should not be my problem, just like my chronic illness shouldn't be anyone elses. So I could really careless about someone elses struggles. Unfortunately, everyone would have to pay for others issues in some form. By the way healthcare is affordable right now, its just people choose to purchase a nice car or other accessories instead of paying for insurance. Plus, how can something work when we don't have the money to pay for it?

cr8er

September 10, 2009 - 6:55 pm EDT

I hope you remember that you posted this comment if you are ever in a serious accident and are in the hospital for an extended period of time or, God forbid, one of your friends, family member or, worse--your children--finds themselves in a predicament where they are not covered. I know the people in this article and are aware of their struggles, and it is my problem. You callous, freak of nature.

bigwill

September 11, 2009 - 9:08 am EDT

Yes, Lord willing, I hope I never have to deal with that. Again though, its my problem not everyone elses. If someone decides to help out of kindness, that's great, but that's their choice. Let's think of it in a different light. A drunk driver gets into an accident from their own stupidity. Why should I have to give part of my hard earned money to support his healthcare from that incident? Its called taking care of your own. Why should I care about someone who lives 5 states away that I don't even know? Don't feed me that BS about being callous, its just called being able to have common sense and reasoning skills.

funnegurl24

September 11, 2009 - 9:31 am EDT

It actually is already your problem and you are already paying for it. It is called Medicaid and Medicare. Who do you think supports these programs? We do with our taxes. So wouldn't you like to see your tax dollars go to ALL of the American people, not just those who struggle to make ends meet or are retired? Even though you may think it is not your problem, you are wrong. If you ever get into a position where you couldn't afford to pay for your health care (or your company can no longer pay it for you) you may end up relying on Medicaid to help take care of you or your family members. Affordable monthly payments may be possible, but you should consider the ridiculously high copays, deductibles and co-insurance that apply to both the individual and the family members that go with those "low" monthly payments. don't assume that this will be worse than what we already have. It may very well be better than what it is now. The main difference will (hopefully) be is that everyone will benefit and all can afford it.

bigwill

September 11, 2009 - 12:16 pm EDT

Medicaid and Medicare are programs that I never had a say so in to begin with, so your point would be irrelevant along that aspect. As for your comment to "don't assume", right back at you. Don't assume that this is going to work either. The government programs in place now are already corrupt and they took years to set in place. This bill has only been in the works for less than a year and you expect me to believe that it will work? C'mon let's be reasonable here. Again, your last sentence is talking about "hope". Why would you want to have a healthcare system that you "HOPE" will work when you could take the time to develope one that you know will work? That's the issue here, the entire concept is based on hopes and crossed fingers. I have had oppotunities to use medicaid but chose not to because I still could afford regular insurance. Unfortunately, there are others that abuse it when they could easily go elsewhere.

Laura

September 10, 2009 - 10:33 am EDT

What a great speech. This is not only a moral plan, it's a pragmatic plan. The real reason Congress and the president are doing this is because the status quo is destroying our economy. Many of those who think the dysfunctional and immoral health care status quo is working for people or the economy is either just plain cold-hearted, paranoid, or buying a pack of lies manufactured by the insurance companies and a bunch of sold out Republicans and blue dog Democrats.

camera lens

September 10, 2009 - 4:30 pm EDT

Laura,
I think another "real" reason the President and Congress are doing this is because they would love even more control. Just think how much power you are giving to them.........unless and until they really back off of some of the more outrageous aspects of the original bill. I will reserve my judgement on the bill when I see it in total.

Love it or hate it, the bill should not be voted on by ANYONE until "We the People" have had a chance to read it. To pass it otherwise is an excercise in total foolishness, I don't care what party you follow. I am not cold hearted, paranoid, nor have I "bought into" a pack of lies. I've just been reading, doing research, and trying to figure out how we can improve our current system, get folks covered in a cost effective manner, and still come out on the side of maintaining my privacy.

Laura, if I lose my job tomorrow, my insurance will go with it because the Cobra $$$ would be too prohibitive. Also, I have family members that have no coverage, that I would like to see acquire coverage at an affordable rate. There are so many of us out here trying to look at this in an objective manner. The thing is we are all going to pay for this in the end.....I would just like to get the best value for my $$$. Also to clarify, Canada, UK, Germany, etc. that others here mentioned.....none of them have "free" coverage. They pay for it with taxes...high taxes.

So let's all take the time and run the numbers. It may be that in the end a blending of several plans may work best and cost less for everyone involved.

camera lens

September 10, 2009 - 4:03 pm EDT

I think before everyone gets excited about this plan, we as citizens, REGARDLESS of your political leanings....need to see the complete revised plan "in writing" on line. After that we as citizens should have 4 months to examine, question, contact our representatives and make suggestions for revisions. I do NOT see the intense need to rush this piece of legislation which if passed ....will not even go into effect for 4 + years.

Let's take the time to do it right. More revisions will need to be made. DETAILS....all details....need to be spelled out in plain language for ALL of us to read, study and clarify. I would like to make sure that the revised plan has eliminated and or explained in detail the following:

~Elminate the govt. access to private citizens bank accounts.

~Eliminate the Electronic ID Card associated with the bill. It is a back door way to get to the Real ID Card that many of us have been battling in all 50 states. The card would have your personal data in a central data bank, that would be ripe for "hacking", (hence your identity is stolen!) and the cards are also easily scanned by those that have the correct equipment. So your private information is much more likely to become public.

~Eliminate any verbage in the bill that in any way mandates, suggest, or even hints at "end of life" discussions. This is a very private issue between a doctor and a patient, ....if the patient wants it.

~Explain in detail how small business owners currrently offering private ins. plans are supposed to be able to compete with a "public option" insurance plan...."IF" the public option (govmt. plan)s is not operated at a "for profit" the way insurances companies operate. This makes no sense. Small businesses in droves will drop the private plans. That is a no brainer. So to state so condescendingy that "we can keep" our current coverage if we like it is total mis-representation of what will actually happen.

These are just a few of the issues, I am sure others here will add to the list.

camera lens

September 10, 2009 - 4:12 pm EDT

I forgot to add.....that taking the time to get the Health Care Reform bill "right" should in no way stop the efforts to immediately eliminate any and all waste and fraud in the current govmt. systems, Medicare, Medicade, Vet., etc.

If we don't figure out what is wrong and how to fix it, you can rest assured that the same corruption will snake it's way into any new plan. So, let's get to work right NOW and get the older systems cleaned up. We will learn valuable information for the newer plans and to set up systems to fight and stop corruption.

Beachwalk

September 10, 2009 - 5:25 pm EDT

These are FACTS. This is NOT "fear tactics".

http://www.exposeobama.com/

Barack Obama said that the plan won’t fund abortions. But it will. In fact, the Democrats specifically cut out of the legislation clear language to prevent funding of abortions. But the Hyde Amendment, which Barack Obama hides behind, would not apply to this legislation because the Hyde Amendment only applies to Department of Health and Human Services appropriations.The Democrats have decided that healthcare expenditures will not be in the HHS budget. Therefore, abortions will be paid for.

Barack Obama said the plan will not cover illegal aliens. The legislation clearly says it will not fund illegal aliens BUT the legislation also prevents anyone from checking on the citizenship status of any person seeking healthcare. He is trying to have it both ways.

He said he would not force the government option on anyone. But, the legislation provides an incentive for private employers to shove their employees onto the government plan.

Obama said more than once, if anyone brings creative ideas to him he'll listen. The Republicans waved their many plans up in the air. Republicans have for months tried to be a part of the health care debate, but the democrats consider their proposals DOA. Until Obama and the democrats are TRULY willing to work in a trueful and bi-partisan way the president's poll number will continue to sink.

camera lens

September 10, 2009 - 6:35 pm EDT

Beachwalk,
You are right, in the case of politicians.....it isn't so much what they say as it is ....what they leave out.

connieohyeah

September 10, 2009 - 7:34 pm EDT

There's a few hundred cheap votes bought for the next go 'round

rmacz

September 10, 2009 - 10:35 pm EDT

What ever happened to it's the economy stupid. I guess when the Democrates are in charge of things, jobs and the national debt doesn't matter anymore. As long as they get there pills, things will be fine.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search