news-record.com

NEWS

Health care reform to take center stage

Tuesday, September 8, 2009
(Updated Wednesday, September 9 - 5:12 am)

Rep. Brad Miller had come home for the congressional recess last month hoping to work on rewriting the nation’s financial services laws, a topic he’s been involved with since his election seven years ago.

But just as lawmakers were heading home to their districts, the national debate over reforming the health care system heated up, complete with raucous town hall meetings, talk radio chatter and a steady stream of charges and countercharges over the bill.

“There’s no oxygen for anything else right now except health care,” Miller said last week in Greensboro. The Raleigh Democrat had just finished a meeting with local leaders and a Treasury Department official over financial services regulations.

Health care is getting ready to suck up more of the congressional oxygen as lawmakers return to work today. On Wednesday, President Barack Obama is scheduled to address Congress. The speech is seen as a sign that Obama will keep the health care discussion front-and-center when Congress returns.

“We believe this is the best way to kick off the final discussions, the final debate, and bring this thing to a close in a way that is meaningful,” White House senior adviser David Axelrod said last week, according to the Associated Press.

If North Carolina lawmakers are any indication, Obama will be making his case to a Congress mostly entrenched in its position and mostly divided along party lines.

“I got an earful,” Rep. Howard Coble said. The Greensboro Republican did not look kindly to Democratic proposals for health reform before the break, and the response from his constituents reinforced that notion, he said.

“Most of the constituents I represent who took the trouble to contact me...they are opposed to the current proposal on health reform,” Coble said. Sentiments ran 2-to-1 against reform proposals, he said, adding he thought the outcry would force congressional leaders to slow the pace of health reform.

Slowing down and “starting over” were themes of a health care forum Republican Sen. Richard Burr hosted in Charlotte. The forum featured Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Those who favor reform fear that “slowing down” is a back-door way of killing health care reform.

Meanwhile, in appearances throughout the state over the past three weeks, Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan has said some sort of health reform bill needs to get done. “At the end of the day, I think we’re going to have health care reform,” Hagan said in late August.

What that reform ends up looking like may change between the end of the August recess and the time any bill passes. For example, Hagan wasn’t sure whether the Senate would insist on a single “public option” provider as a way to provide health insurance to those without it or if a bill could go forward that might rely on states to provide uninsured citizens with coverage.

With the Senate legislation still in flux, much of the attention positive and negative over health reform has focused on a House version of the bill, which itself is likely to change.

“People understand that they would lose their own insurance, they’re not being fooled by what the president was saying,” said Rep. Virginia Foxx, adding that she had distributed copies of the House version of the bill to libraries throughout her district.

The president, the Banner Elk Republican said, has been telling people that they could keep their existing coverage.

“That’s not what the bill says at all,” Foxx said. “The bill says all private health insurance goes away in five years.”

That’s an oversimplification of the bill’s language, according to the nonpartisan FactCheck.Org run by the Annenberg Public Policy Center.

After five years, employer-based health plans will have to meet certain minimum standards and some might have to change. And some employers may drop coverage and pay a penalty so their employees can buy private health coverage through a government portal or opt into the much-discussed “public option” plan.

“What we’re talking about is a set of rules for health insurance that is less strict than the rules North Carolina has for car insurance,” Miller said.

Like their Senate counterparts, North Carolina’s House Republicans seemed to have their opposition to reform efforts solidified by their time home on recess, while Democrats like Miller will return to work in Washington resolved to push a plan through this fall.

“The more I’ve studied it, the more I think the bill can work,” Miller said.
 

Reporting from the Associated Press is included.
 

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

MORE ONLINE

FACTCHECK.ORG: Site describes itself as “a nonpartisan, nonprofit 'consumer advocate’ for voters that works to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.” The Annenberg Political Fact Check is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Go to FactCheck.org to read “Twenty-six lies about HR 3200,” an analysis of common statements about the House version of the health care bill: http://factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-lies-about-hr-3200/

POLITIFACT.COM: Politifact is a Pulitzer Prize winning Web site that vets claims by politicians and others. It uses a truth-o-meter to depict the relative veracity of a claim from “True” down through several levels such as “half true” down to “pants on fire.” For Politifact’s running list of fact-checks on the health care debate: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/subjects/health/

HOW TO REACH YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES SENATE

SENATE

* Sen. Richard Burr 217 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 (202) 224-3154; burr.senate.gov

* Sen. Kay Hagan 521 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 (202) 224-6342; hagan.senate.gov

HOUSE

* Rep. Howard Coble (6th District) 2468 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-3065; coble.house.gov

* Rep. Virginia Foxx (5th District) 1230 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2071; foxx.house.gov

* Rep. Brad Miller (13th District) 1127 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-3032; bradmiller.house.gov

* Rep. Mel Watt (12th District) 2304 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-1510; watt.house.gov

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Laura

September 8, 2009 - 9:13 am EDT

Why would Binker interview Foxx of all people? She's in a district completely outside the N&R readership. The only thing she represents is corporate tyranny. Oh. I just answered my own question.

With all the progressive organizations that have sprung up in the past five years that are doing major fundraising and organizing -- and that actually have millions of smart, wealthy and educated people in their membership -- Miller and other Democrats should understand that they will have h**l to pay if they fail to deliver on their promise of true health care reform that includes a strong, robust public option.

Panacea

September 8, 2009 - 10:22 am EDT

Well, Foxx has also been attracting national attention with her remarks. So it makes a certain amount of sense.

Mark Binker

September 8, 2009 - 10:43 am EDT

To answer the question posed by Laura: Rep. Foxx does represent folks in our readership. Specifically, she has a slice of Rockingham County (granted it's a small one.) For the purposes of our "local" delegation, we consider Coble, Miller and Watt key, since they all have districts that run right through Greensboro. However, Rep. Foxx (R) and Rep. Price (D) sit on the periphery and we'll talk to them on occasion, for variety's sake if nothing else.

And Panacea is correct, as well. Foxx has been one of the more outspoken folks against the health care reform efforts. Her comments actually gave us the opportunity to provide something of a fact check on what is being said by more people (and more representatives) than just her. So she provided a valuable stand-in for a point of view that for good or ill is shaping the debate.

drewwes01

September 8, 2009 - 1:43 pm EDT

Foxx represents corporate tyranny? That's political rhetoric that a rational person would quickly dispense of. Not compelling IMO.

The politicians that are in the tightest spot on this issue are Democrats representing moderate-to-conservative districts/states. The Dems had great success in 06 and 08 picking up seats in swing districts, but now these representatives are in a very difficult position. Any congressperson who votes for a bill with a public option and represents a district that McCain and/or Bush carried in 04/08 will be in SERIOUS trouble in 2010. If they want to keep their job they will probable vote against any bill with a public option. I don't see how a bill with a public option can get out of the Senate anyway. There just aren't the votes to do it.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search