news-record.com

SPORTS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Judge benches football player over eligibility

Friday, September 4, 2009
(Updated 2:29 pm)

GREENSBORO — Northern High football player Gabe King was sent back to the sidelines Thursday after a Superior Court judge dissolved a court order that had temporarily restored King's eligibility.

Judge Ed Gregory's ruling prevents King from practicing with the Nighthawks until a preliminary hearing next week. That's when lawyers representing King and the N.C. High School Athletic Association — the group that originally stripped King of his eligibility — will meet in a court to debate the player's future.

The NCHSAA stripped King of his eligibility in March, ruling he had falsified residency information. King's eligibility was restored last week by district court Judge Angela Foster, who granted a temporary restraining order allowing him to practice at Northern until both sides could meet next week.

Gregory dissolved that order Thursday. He said lawyers for the NCHSAA should have been notified of last week's hearing so they could have argued their case to Foster.

Chris Justice, King's lawyer, said that the senior should be allowed to continue to practice with the Nighthawks until his preliminary hearing. The NCHSAA requires a football player to practice with his teammates for nine days before he can compete.

Since Foster's ruling, King has practiced three days with Northern.

“There is absolute irreparable harm of not letting him practice,” Justice said. “(King) is sought by a number of the nation's top colleges as a football recruit. Every night that he's not allowed to play, to showcase his talent to those national schools, jeopardizes his chances.” King, who is 6 feet, 6 inches tall and weighs 253 pounds, plays defensive tackle.

Durham lawyer Jim Maxwell, representing the NCHSAA, said King isn't being hurt.

“He's going through conditioning on his own right now, and we're certainly not trying to prevent him from having his day in court,” Maxwell said. “He'll get that, too.”

Gregory's ruling pushes back King's possible return to football by at least three weeks. After next week's Sept. 11 game against Northwest Guilford, the Nighthawks don't play again until Sept. 25 against Williams. Should King receive a favorable ruling at next week's preliminary hearing, he could play in that game.

King played at Page in 2008. That summer, King's parents moved to Winston-Salem. Instead of joining them, King moved to his adult sister's apartment within the Page school district — the same address he wrote down when filling out a participation form.

The NCHSAA argues that King's parents did not transfer legal guardianship of their son to their daughter, making him ineligible to attend Page.

King's parents moved back to Greensboro within Northern's attendance zone earlier this year. King transferred to Northern in April.

Contact Robert Bell at 373-7055 or robert.bell@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Former Page High School defensive end Gabriel King.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

fisher

September 4, 2009 - 8:57 am EDT

“(King) is sought by a number of the nation's top colleges as a football recruit."
While he's out, he can work on his studies. Colleges can be academically challenging.

fisher

September 4, 2009 - 8:59 am EDT

m

TOTHE POINT

September 4, 2009 - 9:43 am EDT

I guess I can see both sides here. The NCHSAA wants its rules followed and they should be and it seems that Mr. King was trying to stay at Page to be able to play. I am wondering why the family was moving around so much? I am also wondering if they fully knew the rules regarding legal guadianship as it applies to sports participation and residency. Is that a rule that is clearly in the minds of all parents who want to move from district to district and leave their child behind to finish out the year? But if he works out on his own he should be fine especially if he is as good as I read that he is suppose to be. He will not have any problem being recruited. Does anyone know what type of student he is academically? I agree this would be a great time to get those grades up academically and to register himself with the NCAA Clearing House. Now the issue is what will happen next week if they rule against him? I will say more about his options then but in the mean time I wish him well.

MommaOf2

September 4, 2009 - 10:55 am EDT

Fisher and ToThePoint, I have absolutely no first-hand knowledge of Gabe King or his academic capabilities, but you both seem to assume that he is academically challeged. There's a reasonable chance that his academics are up to par and that his love of football is what's driving his passion for a football scholarship. As the parent of two student athletes, a college freshman playing basketball on a full scholarship and a high school junior who plays football, I have a pretty clear perspective. Both of my sons are quality students; however, for my oldest son, there was no greater recognition of all his hard work on the court than to be offered a D-1 basketball scholarship. Don't get me wrong, he understood the importance of academics, but his take on it was that his basketball skills would get him into a great D-1 basketball program and the good grades would help keep him there. What I'm saying is give the kid a break. Let's don't presume to know that he needs to "get those grades up", as ToThePoint put it. Maybe his goal should be to maintain his grades.

And yes, everyday that a student-athlete is off the proverbial radar, (s)he is losing ground with recruiters. However, I personally don't think Gabe should be allowed to participate in his sport until issues of his eligibility are resolved. Unfortunately, some truths were not told, whether by parents or coaches, and now this promising student-athlete is paying the price.

TOTHE POINT

September 4, 2009 - 1:47 pm EDT

MommaOf2, I think your response to my statement is dumb and at best ignorant. I made no such claim or comments about Mr. King being academically challenges. Where do you see in my comments that I did and are you some sort of mine reader because if you are you need to not give up your day job. My comments are very clear I was asking a very general and none predictive question about what type of student he was and nothing else. You also took another one of my statements out of context. Are you on some sort of medication where you have the ability to read into what people are really saying? If so I suggest you adjust your medication. Suggesting that a kid use the time to keep his grades up means just that.... and nothing else. Get a life!

MommaOf2

September 4, 2009 - 6:44 pm EDT

ToThePoint, you are seriously hostile. Maybe you need to take a break from this blog and focus upon your own academics...quite a few typographical errors!!!

I'm the one who said that maybe you should suggest that Gabe "maintain" his grades rather than get them up. Maybe you're the one who needs medication...and a life. CHILL OUT! It's not that serious.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 2:14 pm EDT

Read my response toPanacea.

This is not the crime or deception of the century.
We are screwing around with technicalities but no malicious intent.
Why?

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 4:19 pm EDT

Because it is part of a pattern of parents gaming the system, to break rules and have an unfair advantage over other athletes and other schools in competition.

The rules for high school athletics are set by the NCHSAA. They are designed to create a level playing field for competition, to ensure fairness. When one school, or one student, breaks those rules then they are taking unfair advantage of schools, athletes, and parents who follow the rules.

It creates an environment where kids growing up think the rules don't apply to them. It condones cheating and unethical behavior. GCS and the NCHSAA need to take a firm stand on this issue because the moral integrity of our younger generation is at stake. It is crucial that these rules be enforced, otherwise they are not worth having. If the message is the rules don't exist for some people, then you get criminals who think it is OK to murder, rob, and rape. You get brokers who think it is OK for them to steal from grandmothers. You get politicians who think it is OK to subvert the democratic process, to take bribes, to pass laws intended to help their favorites while letting the little guy get screwed.

Good morals begin in childhood. They need reinforcement to hone the message EARLY.

Malice is not required for cheating or any other sort of selfish behavior. It is still wrong to cheat, even if you only hurt yourself.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 5:27 pm EDT

He did not cheat.

He also claims the school knew.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 9:39 pm EDT

I don't think the NCHSAA would have declared him ineligible if he had played by the rules.

He cheated. This case has no business being in the courts.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 7:57 pm EDT

"GCS and the NCHSAA need to take a firm stand on this issue because the moral integrity of our younger generation is at stake"

Coime on

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 9:39 pm EDT

It has to start somewhere. You cannot lecture young people on good moral values only on issues you cherry pick.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 11:44 am EDT

MommaOf2, generally I agree with what you are saying. We don't know what kind of student King is, although using the time to focus on academics is not bad advice either way.

I am sure the issue is hurting his chances with recruiters. I can see a recruit say, "Where is this King kid I've been told so much about? Not here? Why? Because he is ineligible? Oh . . . ." Why should a recruiter waste his time if it's uncertain King will ever play again?

While that is sad, I don't feel sorry for King. This kid had to know the rules were being broken, and he went along with it instead of going to Winston-Salem with his parents. And if he truly didn't know, well, it's still too bad for him. A price has to be paid, and he will be the one to pay it. The NCHSAA has GOT to make an example to discourage other parents from gaming the system. If there are no consequences, then there is no incentive to follow the rules.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 1:20 pm EDT

"A price has to be paid, and he will be the one to pay it. The NCHSAA has GOT to make an example to discourage other parents from gaming the system. If there are no consequences, then there is no incentive to follow the rules."

Rules,

Professional players use drugs.
College coaches have sex on restaurant tables.
NFL playes carry guns, electrocute dogs, get drunk and run people over.
NBA is full of thugs.

A price has to be paid, example consequences.
By the book. Think about "Les Miserables "

The kid told the truth.
I'm living with my sister.
He met the spirit of the rules
His parents were fine with it.

He is in high school.
I have known lots of people over the years who got transfered out of town.
Their kid was in high school.
Not much time left.
They lived with friends or other family relatives. For a year or two.
They did not go to court and transfer guardian ship.

This is absurd

Now "guardian ship" is all this is about.

The facts are:
He started in Page district and remained in page district
He moved in with his his sister and told the school
His parents let him stay so he could continue to play.

The adults running sports here are sacrificing this kid on a silly tecnicality.
They are no better than coach K who says I don't really recruit

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 4:24 pm EDT

Pro players who use drugs should be banned from their sport. The outrageous behavior of college coaches, NFL players and the like should be dealt with quickly and harshly. Michael Vick has no business playing football today.

Your examples of bad behavior are irrelevant. How does the behavior of others excuse the behavior of cheaters in GCS sports?

King had two years of high school left. This isn't a kid who's got just a few months left. He should have moved to Winston Salem with his parents. PERIOD.

This kid isn't being sacrificed. He is facing the consequence of actions he AND his parents knew were wrong. He needs to man up and accept the consequences. He isn't being sentenced to a penal colony or hounded for life. He's been told he can't play football this year. That is an appropriate punishment for not playing by the rules.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 5:30 pm EDT

He is a 16/17 year old kid .

What he did hurt no one.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 9:41 pm EDT

Sure it did. It hurt the teams Page competed against because of the unfair advantage. It hurt the kid who could've played for Page, but lost a spot on the team because King should not have been there in the first place.

Lying and cheating hurts the entire community.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 5:44 pm EDT

I did not say it excused it.

I'm simply saying his issue is a minor technicality.

Panacea

September 5, 2009 - 1:24 pm EDT

No, it is not minor. Depriving some other kid of an opportunity to play is not a "minor" technicality.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 1:22 pm EDT

By the way.

The kid does not want or need our advice.
He wants justice.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 4:25 pm EDT

He's getting the justice he deserves by not being allowed to play.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 5:31 pm EDT

In any case I bet he is telling the truth.

buzzman

September 4, 2009 - 12:10 pm EDT

Judge Angela Foster should not have ruled on this case without lawyers from the NCHSAA being present. Seems like this was an end-run just to get this student back on the field. Wonder what Judge Foster would have done had this issue been about a white boy?

unavailable

September 4, 2009 - 12:28 pm EDT

OMG are you kidding me with the "race card" again?!! I am so sick and tired of people using this excuss in life to blame someone else for their own failings. Get over it already!! It is unfortunate for the rest of the black population when a few of us cannot seem to find another argument when issues such as this come up. Grow up

sir william

September 4, 2009 - 12:39 pm EDT

Sometimes, they can't accept the fact they caught caught cheating, so they pull out the good ol' "out to get the black boy" excuse. That really is a lame duck excuse. Besides, if this guy is all that good, the college scouts have been eyeing him for the last couple of years! Buzzman, if that's all you can bring to the table, maybe you should stay away from the table!! Playing the race card is SOOOO SAD!!!

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 3:23 pm EDT

"The NCHSAA argues that King's parents did not transfer legal guardianship of their son to their daughter, making him ineligible to attend Page."

Obviously the NCHSAA officials played too many games without their helmets.

berillo

September 4, 2009 - 3:39 pm EDT

dcolin-what aspect of that quote is it you disagree with? That rule has been in place forever and the coaches, administrators, and most of the athletes are aware of it. I think it is a rule in pretty much every state association in the country. I have no idea what Page coaches may or may not have known or did. I may be misunderstanding your comment, though.

dcolin

September 4, 2009 - 5:33 pm EDT

For goodness sakes.

Principles are far more important than rules.
He deceived no one.
He did not jump schools.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 9:45 pm EDT

What principle do you think is more important than the rules? Not saying principles can't be more important than rules. What I'm asking is, what principle is more important than the rules regarding residency and eligibility, how has that principle been violated, and why is it more important than these rules?

eduguytoo

September 4, 2009 - 9:05 pm EDT

I've followed this story for months and commented many times. My frustration all along has been that only a tiny fraction of the story has reached the light of day. There are people who post here...a lot...and those folks make it sound as though they have an inside edge on the story for one side or the other. Seems to me that what we really have are different agendas....defend the kid, blame the parents, protect the coaches, uphold the sanctity of NCHSAA, decry the low standards GCS sometimes applies to its hirings of coaches/teachers, etc.

In the end, in my heart of hearts I think that EVERYONE involved in this saga bears some part of the responsibility for what has happened. Gabe King and his family are culpable because they didn't follow the rules concerning residency, but the rules don't seem to be evenly enforced, and they're somewhat convoluted. For example, if what has been reported is true, that a "form" that is a main character in this play states "custodian" as opposed to "guardian," that could be significant. One little word, and I don't think they are entirely synonymous. I've also put into print before that rules have come out during this recent investigation about legal residency that I never knew existed.

Though I've asked it many times, I've never gotten a clear answer about WHEN Page coaches and administrators realized that Gabe King had been living with someone other than his parents for the purpose of attending the school and playing sports. From where I stand, it seems like there is a significant time lag from when that occurred to when Page reported things. And I've heard all sorts of reasons why they delayed. They may be legitimate reasons in someone's mind, but I'd feel a lot better if they'd found out one day and reported it the next.

I also don't understand the coaches treating a "troublemaker" with such kid gloves. For heavens sake, if Gabe King got into fights during games, was a disruption in the locker room, etc., he should have been canned immediately. In fairness to the team and the Page community, if this kid's behavior was such a cancer, it needed to be cut out far earlier. The fact that he is a top football prospect is irrelevant. The fact that he's a smart kid who listens to the wrong people is irrelevant.

Finally, the Guilford County Schools need to demonstrate a consistent standard of school attendance policy. For heavens sakes, I suspect that nearly every one of us is aware of one or more children who attend a school to which they are not assigned...or that live with someone other than their "legal guardian" for the purpose of attending a particular school. I realize that this isn't exactly apples and apples, because the athletic participation standards are somewhat different (or so I've found out). But I don't think they should be. I think the school system and board of education are on a slippery slope when they grant waivers for school attendance or basically turn a blind eye for kids who attend where they oughtn't. The GCS has arduously pursued this residency issue for one school in the system as it pertains to athletics, and that school is now the scapegoat. But I see little evidence that they have conducted such thorough investigations elsewhere. I contend that investigations equivalent to Northern Guilford conducted at other schools will yield similar eligibility infractions. Just on the basis of a kid living with a separated parent in a domicile not recognized as the "legal residence" is bound to exist all over this county. Family demographics would defy any other conclusion. Is that a crime? Yes it is, I have learned...a punishable crime. And I'm not talking about the families at NG that recently came to light that rented houses and never moved into them. That's flatly deceptive and flatly wrong. I'm thinking of an abused mother who moves out of her home (legal residence) with children in tow. If that mother moves into an apartment in another school district, and one of her children happens to be a participating athlete on the high school level and registers into a school in the district where he now lives, unless that mother takes care of crossing and dotting the legal "i's" and "t's," they are in violation for sports participation.

The bottom line is this: anyone who believes this is a matter of black and white or right or wrong is simply, well, WRONG. The truth is that there have been a lot of mistakes made, and if any long-term fixes are going to be made, it will take a multifaceted approach. Sadly, one of the things that probably needs to happen first will never occur. That would be for everyone to step up to the plate (to use a sports cliche) and admit what he did wrong. People these days don't like to admit that they're wrong. It is perceived as a sign of weakness or ineptitude. Sadly, admitting mistakes is often the best pathway to healing.

A long, philosophical preamble, and now here's my prediction for Gabe King. Gabe King will NEVER play high school football in the public school realm again. There will continue to be legal wrangling that will extend so far into the current season that by the time any resolution is reached, his time on the field will be a moot point. So long as there are judges whose ears can be bent and brains persuaded to make rulings on matters about which they have little knowledge, this will be a ping pong game played out in courtrooms and back rooms. And in the end, it will come down to "he said/she said" with nobody really knowing what went on.

This game will not end in a tie and nobody is going to come out a winner. In the end, we'll only have losers.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 51°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 56° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search