news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: The lowest priority

Friday, September 4, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

Gov. Bev Perdue never demanded that state legislators raise taxes to protect prison cells.

No one would have responded to that during recent budget wrangles.

Instead, the governor made impassioned pleas for protecting classrooms, providing enough money to make sure class sizes would not have to be increased to unmanageable proportions.

The governor made it clear: Educating children is the state's top priority.

Prisoners, on the other hand, rank at the bottom in public opinion. If budget cuts require placing more inmates in a cell, or surpassing a prison's listed capacity, well, serving time is not supposed to be easy, people say.

True. But there is more to consider.

Overcrowded prisons are more dangerous -- not only for inmates, but also for guards. Detention officers deserve to work in as safe an environment as practically possible. It's also more difficult to provide education, training and rehabilitation services for inmates in crowded conditions, reducing the chances that they might become productive citizens when they're released.

The N.C. Department of Correction faces these problems in the wake of sharp budget cuts enacted by the General Assembly this summer. It's closing seven prisons, including the Guilford Correctional Center at McLeansville, relocating inmates and eliminating hundreds of positions.

Decisive actions are needed to respond to declining tax revenues. The department must find ways to house more inmates in fewer facilities with less supervision. If that means fitting two prisoners instead of one in a cell or housing more inmates in dormitory-style barracks, prison officials have no choice, for now. It costs an average of $27,000 a year to keep an inmate in state prison, and that amount must be reduced. Nevertheless, before too long, the governor must call for making prisons a higher priority, along with better probation programs and alternatives to incarceration. That will take political courage, but it's unavoidable.

In Guilford County, Sheriff BJ Barnes fought that battle for a decade. Last year, commissioners finally put a proposal for a new jail on a bond referendum and voters approved it.

No one is thrilled about spending $114 million for a new jail in downtown Greensboro, but Barnes made the case -- again and again -- for its necessity.

Now county officials have to get it done for the budgeted cost or less. Taxpayers said they're willing to fund the project, but they should not tolerate wasteful overruns like those that occurred the last time the county built a jail, in High Point, two decades ago.

It's a sad reality that so much space must be devoted to incarcerating people who pose a danger to the public. But the job should be done right.

Prisoners must be kept in an environment that's safe for themselves and officers and that offers hope of rehabilitation. Yet, building and operating detention facilities should not cost a penny more than what's absolutely required. Prisons will never rate as high as schools.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 8:38 am EDT

We also need to start dedicating more money to replicating successful program that keep people out of prisons in the first place: like the juvenile offender program in Missouri, and creating more drug and alcohol courts.

novel

September 4, 2009 - 9:06 am EDT

What rehab is actually done in prisons? Do the inmates learn more from each other about how to be better criminals? What proof is there that "rehab" works? Do we need to change the "rehab" we are doing?

I think our money is much better spent on children early on that there is a better life, and with an education they are better equipped to break the cycle they were born into, or to get into situations that adversely affect them for the rest of their lives. Our schools could be so much better and make more of a difference for our country if we truly gave them the top priority we give lip service to.

Panacea

September 5, 2009 - 10:02 am EDT

Few criminals are rehabilitated once in prison. What I am talking about works with non-violent offenders to keep them from learning criminal habits, which is all you learn doing hard time.

Educational and vocational programs in prisons are an important part of control, and in some cases do help a motivated inmate return to society as a productive member.

gsostudent

September 4, 2009 - 9:49 am EDT

Prisons are not a solution for our problems. We need to actually deal with poverty instead of just locking all poor people up.

countryboy

September 4, 2009 - 2:59 pm EDT

Fight the causes of poverty...yes! But if you are under the impression that only the poor inhabit our prisons, your research is flawed. Bernie comes to mind. We will come to a point in this nation when we will only have prison space for violent offenders, and that might not be a bad thing.

overtaxed

September 4, 2009 - 11:10 pm EDT

Why don't we do what other nations do and sentence criminals to hard labor instead of these drug filled recreation facilities we call prison. Maybe then someone will think twice before becomining a repeat offender.

Panacea

September 5, 2009 - 10:07 am EDT

What nations, China? Oh yes, let's become like the Chinese: a communist dictatorship that is poisoning its citizens left and right--melamine tainted milk and pet food, poisonous toothpaste, and now lead poisoning an entire village. Shoot those condemned to death in the back of the head and charge the family for the bullet--for minor crimes.

Prisons are drug filled, but there's nothing recreational about them. Having worked in one for 3 years, I've seen them for what they are. Warehouses.
A large majority of crimes are committed so the perpetrator can buy drugs. That's why the drug courts are so important--they deal with the root cause of crime and how a low recividism rate, much lower than lock 'em up and throw away the key.

I don't have a problem with locking up the violent offenders. But most criminals are non-violent--they need intervention not jail time.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search