news-record.com

NEWS

Coping with student overload

Friday, September 4, 2009
(Updated 9:56 pm)

GREENSBORO — Twenty second-graders said goodbye to their teachers Thursday — just a few days after meeting them — and said hello to Sally Myers, their new second-grade teacher.

Myers joined Irving Park Elementary on Tuesday, a late addition to a school bulging at the seams, due in part to other schools failing to meet testing goals.

Under federal education guidelines, schools that fail to meet academic growth goals are sanctioned for their performance. One of those sanctions allows students to “opt out,” or transfer from a failing school to another designated school.

This year, three schools were added to Guilford’s list of 15 already required to offer the opt-out.

Several schools have received nearly 100 students this year from schools that failed to meet federal testing goals. Officials say most of the receiving schools can accommodate the influx, but that isn’t the case at every school, especially Irving Park.

Irving Park Elementary is near capacity again this year. As of Thursday, the school had 725 students, 84 of whom transferred from two schools that failed to meet testing goals last year.

“Things are tight, that’s for sure,” said Melissa Nixon, principal at Irving Park.

Enrollment projections for the school were about 680 students before classes began last week. Nixon even cut two teachers over the summer when the school board was preparing for state budget cuts.

Some of the local cuts were rolled back, and Nixon rehired one teacher and hired Myers this week. Still, teacher-to-student ratios are at or above state limits in many classes.

Amy Johnson, the teacher Nixon rehired, has 25 students in her second-grade class. The state cap is 24, but schools can request a waiver.

Johnson said she’s making do with the space she has — the kids don’t all fit on her reading rug — but she’s more worried about how much time she spends with each child.

“It just takes more time, and I just can’t give them the attention I want,” she said.

And that attention has an impact on test scores, Johnson and Nixon said.

Three of Johnson’s students were moved to Myers’ class on Thursday.

Opting out of one school for another can be costly in other ways. If a family decides to send a child to another school, the system must pay for the busing. That cost was more than $420,000 last year.

School board member Paul Daniels says it’s time for bigger changes. “I think at some point folks are going to say we can’t keep shoveling money into these schools and depriving others,” he said.

Daniels believes Superintendent Maurice “Mo” Green’s plans for teacher accountability and other initiatives could help low-performing schools.

But, Daniels said, “We also have to have parents and students doing their part.”

Many school officials say federal testing goals are unfair. Those goals apportion students into demographic groups. Every group must achieve academic goals. If one group fails, the whole school fails and suffers the consequences.

“It only allows for an all-or-nothing model, it does not show all the growth our students are making in all of our subgroups,” said Kelly Hales, director of Guilford County’s Title I program.

Title I is a federal designation for schools that have a large percentage of students living in poverty. Those schools receive additional funding to help improve achievement.

In turn,  the government holds them to higher standards. If those schools fail to make academic growth goals, they face sanctions, including tutoring or the opt-out provision.

School board member Deena Hayes said there are other problems with opting out. She said the numbers show that most students still struggle to meet testing goals after they leave their original schools. And leaving their neighborhood schools takes students away from their communities.

“What happens to our kids is they’re called 'opt-out kids’ and they’re seen as a liability to the school,” she said. “They’re treated that way, and they’re taught that way.”

Nixon said she knows that occurs at some schools but not hers. But she could use one more teacher and more money for services like tutoring. The Title I schools many of her students have left receive money for just those types of things.

“They receive hundreds of thousands more that we could use,” Nixon said.

Meanwhile, enrollment at those Title I schools remains well below capacity.

Jackson Middle was built for 759 students; on Tuesday, its enrollment was 398.

Mendenhall Middle, a school that is receiving students who opt out of Jackson Middle, is at 967 students so far. It was built for 878.

Enrollment at Title I schools must remain low because federal guidelines require those schools to have low teacher-to-student ratios. But enrollment at some of those schools is below even those thresholds.
 

Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com

 

Accompanying Photos

Joseph Rodriguez (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Second grade teacher Amy Johnson gives a hug to one of her students who cried as she left for the newly created class, created due to the increase in student numbers at the school.

Additional Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

GCSparent

September 4, 2009 - 6:46 am EDT

It is my hope that someday soon, someone at the top will realize (like so many of us already have) that the "opt-out" program isn't working. It's time to re-focus and get "real" to address the issues underlying the failure to meet the achievement goals. ThHis involves everyone-administrators, teachers, students and PARENTS. Everyone needs to check in when it comes to their student's education. Shifting students around isn't the answer.

speakup2

September 4, 2009 - 6:56 am EDT

Why are the student opting out. It appears to me that if students are failing, it is the Teacher that need opting out.

formerteacher

September 4, 2009 - 8:26 am EDT

If this is your solution, than I certainly hope you are neither a parent or teacher. In MOST cases, the lack of student achievement centers in the home. Students are sent to school by parents that haven't read to and talked with them in regular conversations to stimulate early childhood language development. They aren't taught to respect adults or how to act in a group setting. They get into trouble in school and miss classtime. The parents don't make sure that students are completing homework at home ... A teacher is only with a child for 6 hours a day. Teachers do NOT teach in a bubble ... so many factors like those listed above as well as lack of sleep, proper nutrition, and exercise play into performance. Many teachers work miracles with students every day ... they deserve more respect and credit than they are given!!!!

truth

September 4, 2009 - 8:44 am EDT

formerteacher,

You are so right. Sure, there are probably some teachers that are sorry. The majority of the one's I've encountered are doing their best with limited resources. Many parents have the same mindset that speakup's comments indicate. That the teachers are responsible for all of their education and they can just drop off their kids each day with no follow-up. I read with my child every night and sometimes it isn't easy. But I feel it is my responsibility as a parent. If other parents felt the same way, a lot of our problems wouldn't exist.

Panacea

September 4, 2009 - 10:51 am EDT

A lot of educatonal woes would be solved if principals would enforce classroom discipline and back up the teachers. The kids act out in class because they know they can get away with it.

DaveW

September 4, 2009 - 1:54 pm EDT

panacea--You are SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO correct!

JoeScott

September 4, 2009 - 8:21 am EDT

Here are two things Guilford County Schools could do to fix some of it's problems:

1) Stop playing musical principals and administrators. Nine times out of ten, when a principal or assistant principal starts to get a good grasp on his/her school he/she is transfered to another school in the county, or worse, given a job in central office away from the students who need their help the most. In some schools, you'll even have two or three administrators transfer to another county school in the span of a year, and the result is always chaos. If nothing else, kids need stability, and one of the most important ingredients to a successful school are administrators who help a school run like clockwork and establish reputations with kids as persons who will catch and immediately punish anyone who's disobedient. When students don't have that, they quickly become aware, and go off the deep end. I can understand an administrator's desire to advance, but I'm too worried about our kids' ability to advance for that to matter. Maybe instead of offering successful administrators high paying jobs, they should give awards and salary hikes. Great principals need to stay where they are, for decades if they must. And the people who take their jobs when they leave should be administrators who worked in the same schools long enough to keep the school in the same shape.

2) Make sure all of our principals live inside the county - if not the city - where they work. I won't name names, but the principal for one of our schools with the most at-risk students lives in Durham. This should not be allowed for the very reason that being a principal is not so much a full-time job as it is a full-and-a-half-time job. Why do principals make hefty salaries? Because they are supposed to work late hours, making sure each school day runs smoothly. This is impossible to do if you have a two-hour commute each day. On top of that, principals and teachers should have an organic relationship and attachment with the communities where they work -- something that will never happen if you live two or three counties away.

UsingBrain

September 4, 2009 - 9:40 am EDT

Agreed that opt-out is not working and it is lowering standard of the good schools. Since the Title I schools end-up which such lower student-to-teacher ratio I think they should move out the students that are at or above grade-level to an opt-out school so they can excel. Leave the lower performing schools at the Title I so specialzed resources can be brought to bear on the problem. Also in order not to punish the Title I school for lower scores they should be measured on improvement percentages as the most important not just making a high score.

GCS Parent

September 4, 2009 - 10:23 am EDT

By default that is what is happening. The higher achieving students are the ones opting out and leaving the lower performing students at the Title 1 school. I agree that opting out doesn't work. I admire the "spirit if the law". I think that it was intended as such a severe threat to a school that administrators would go to great lenghts to prevent it, and for those schools that didn't do that it was meant as a "savior" for the kids caught in an underperforming school. If just one subgroup didn't cause a school to fail all of the NCLB measures would be more successful. NCLB legislation has some good parts to it (don't start a debate on this please). But, in our educational reality they will never work. There are too many social forces that work against the most at risk sub groups to keep them from achieving in school. As the teacher above put it - they don't teach in a bubble. My oldest child attended a program in one of GCSs most at risk schools. We live on the other side of the county. It was quite an eye opener for us. I witnessed a large effort by the school just to get the neighborhood parents to send their kids to school. Most of them lived within a half mile of the school. If you can't get them in the building because of home issues, how is it the teacher's fault for their failure? How will more money and tutoring help a child that isn't there? How will sending them to another school help? We need to wake up and start pointing the finger back to the homes and parents, not the teachers. Because they live in an "at risk" community doesn't shift the responsibility from their parents to the rest of us. I wish we had leaders that would tell them that.

DaveW

September 4, 2009 - 12:19 pm EDT

A license is required to become a teacher.
A license is required to get married.
A license is required to drive a car.
A license is required to shoot a deer or catch a fish.
A license IS NOT REQUIRED TO PARENT. BEING A PARENT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ALL OF THE PREVIOUS LISTED.
There is NO accountability for parents and TOO MUCH for educators.

GCS Parent

September 4, 2009 - 3:24 pm EDT

Sadly, our society champions having no accountability. Personal choices that end up going bad are always someone elses fault. I for one am SICK OF IT.

PaulF

September 4, 2009 - 1:57 pm EDT

GCSParent - I agree with one of your points and disagree with another.

I don't think it is the higher achieving kids that are opting out. It is in the best interests of the Title 1 school's administrators to convince the low achievers to leave. Their test scores will go up instantly, right? I don't think Irving Park is getting the best and the brightest from the Title 1 schools.

I do agree that the underlying issue here is the home life of these kids. There are too many people who are motivated to have kids but are not motivated to properly raise them. It makes me angry that we have to throw resources and money at these schools because the parents will not accept the responsibility of raising a child. So, what do the kids/parents of schools like Irving Park get for performing well? An overcrowded school and less resources.

They should rename "No Child Left Behind" to "No Child Too Far Ahead".

GCS Parent

September 4, 2009 - 3:28 pm EDT

You may be right about admin pressure to move the "bottom tier". There is certainly motivation for that. But, I also have witnessed that even the top students at some of the worst schools are not up to snuff. The title 1 money should follow the students to the opted out school. But, logic is no part of this. Opting out hurts both sides and leaves empty seats in a county that can not afford to have them. I know that one of the other "punishments" for too many years of failure is a total administration replacement in the school. Does anyone know if that has happend here? I haven't heard of it.

Fiona

September 4, 2009 - 3:46 pm EDT

Parents should be responsible for their children's education, but maybe some of these parents need to be educated as well. I believe they don't know how to help their children because they can't help themselves. Yeah maybe they should not have had children, but it is to late for that. Maybe the schools should beef up the salaries and positions for social workers. The social workers can make home visits and speak with parents and began to help those parents understand how much they can do to help their child succeed in school

princessaporvida

September 4, 2009 - 4:40 pm EDT

I am one of the parents that have chose to enroll my children in Irving park this year. I am coming from a Title I school and I felt my children were not getting the education that they were entitled to. I am a parent who had my children at the brightwood district and they were taught VERY well there. Then I move into an area and my kids are in a title I school and it was a joke. My kids were not coming home with any to little homework a night. I was so used to them having packets of homework for the week and then they had maybe a color page of homework to do a night. This was homework for kindergarden? I was not pleased. My family is hispanic and I felt that was hindering my kids education. A lot of the kids at this school were minorites.A lot of them had english as a second language. So I felt I had to step in and try to see if my kids could learn better in a better(upscale) school. I am also in school and it also helps out this way too. I agree a lot of it is not the teachers fault but if the teachers were given more raises and better environments to work in maybe GCS would not have Title I schools at all.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search