The difference between protecting your home and taking the law into your own hands can be slight.
Ideally, citizens should let law enforcement and courts handle lawbreakers, but for some crime victims that may seem too little, too late.
Two recent incidents, one here, the other in Charlotte, underscore a troubling gray area.
On Aug. 22, four teens, one armed with a gun, burst into the home of an elderly Charlotte couple, terrorized them and made off with money, jewelry and another gun.
The 76-year-old man broke free, had his wife call 911, jumped into his truck and headed off in the direction he thought his assailants had gone -- ostensibly to provide police with information.
But the scene turned ugly several blocks away when he confronted them. The man told investigators one of the suspects turned toward him. Fearing he had a gun, the man fired his, killing the unarmed 15-year-old.
Last Wednesday afternoon in Greensboro, a Munster Avenue resident fired three rounds into the air outside his home after coming face-to-face with would-be burglars fleeing the scene. One suspect was arrested nearby and the shooter was charged with discharging a firearm in the city.
Was it protecting the homeplace or vigilante justice? In North Carolina, it's legal to kill someone in defense of yourself or someone else. The law also protects homeowners who shoot to defend their property.
Responding with force on your own land is much easier to condone than tracking a suspect blocks away. But in either situation, collateral damage is possible -- even from shooting into the air. The bullet has to land somewhere.
Victims, of course, have a right to feel violated. One minute, the Charlotte couple was eating ice cream in the safety of their basement. The next, they were staring down the muzzle of a criminal's gun.
In all likelihood, police would have arrived too late to nab these burglars. Even so, letting police do their job alone would have been far wiser than the victim getting involved by pursing and confronting his tormenters.
A 15-year-old is dead and an elderly man might face serious charges, depending on the district attorney's investigation. A jury could decide whether his response was worth it.
Despite falling crime rates, many people still live in fear. Even with community watches and home security systems, there remains a pervasive feeling of vulnerability. Drastic measures can look very inviting.
A man's home might well be his castle, but laws, common sense and public safety should dictate how far he goes to protect it if threatened.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.