news-record.com

EDUCATION

Stakeouts used in investigation of Northern High

Thursday, August 27, 2009
(Updated 11:31 am)

GREENSBORO — In the days after Northern Guilford High School won the 2009 3-A boys basketball state title, coaches and players attributed their success to the long hours and extra work they put in before and during the season.

In court documents released Wednesday, Guilford County Schools appears to have taken a page from the Nighthawks’ playbook, going to great lengths to prove that some of the players on that team were ineligible.

Daylong stakeouts. Interviews with landlords and neighbors. Voting records. Utility bills. Even online videos. No scrap of information seemed too small for school system investigators, who ultimately ruled the Nighthawks used two ineligible players — a ruling that was later used to strip the team of its championship.

School system officials believe J.R. Gant and Asad Lamot, two key players during the Nighthawks’ playoff run, lived outside the school’s attendance zone — Gant within Northeast Guilford High School’s school boundaries and Lamot in Mebane, where he would have attended Eastern Alamance High.

The documents were part of a defense motion by Guilford County Schools to dismiss a lawsuit brought this month by the students’ families.

Superior Court Judge Shannon Joseph dismissed the families’ motion for a temporary injunction that would have reinstated the students’ athletics eligibility and allowed them to return to Northern Guilford. Both would be high school seniors this year.

Lamot enrolled Tuesday at Oak Ridge Military Academy, where former Northern Guilford basketball coach Stan Kowalewski now coaches. Sources said Wednesday night that Gant has yet to register at Northeast Guilford, the school to which he was reassigned.

School system officials have divulged little about their 10-month investigation, and Jill Wilson, the system’s attorney, declined to talk about the nature of the investigation. Neither the Gants nor the Lamots could be reached Wednesday for comment.

Court documents entered as part of the case paint a picture of Guilford County Schools employees spending hours building a case against the Gants and Lamots — and of the families’ attempts to stay ahead of the investigation.

In some instances, the evidence gathered in the schools system’s report was obtained through extensive interviews and staking out houses. Other times investigators needed only to Google the students’ names for damning evidence.

The documents show several exhibits — utility bills, property records, voter registration forms and driver’s licenses — indicating that the Gants live in Northeast Guilford’s attendance zone and the Lamots live in Mebane.

School system officials even referenced several videos posted on MySpace, a social networking Web site, showing Asad Lamot playing basketball outside his parents’ Mebane home.

Affidavits also indicate that Northern Guilford maintained poor records for student eligibility. Indeed, in many cases, there were no eligibility records at all for some students.

But the most damning evidence focuses on the Gants and Lamots’ attempts to rent a house within Northern Guilford’s school district.

In one affidavit, Greensboro landlord Jennifer Al-Jaouni said she met with Tim Gant in July 2007. Tim Gant told Al-Jaouni he was interested in renting her home on North Church Street.

Al-Jaouni offered to show Tim Gant the house, according to the affidavit, but he declined, saying he didn’t need to see the inside of the house.

Tim Gant rented the house starting Aug. 1, 2007. Days later, J.R. Gant enrolled at Northern Guilford. According to the affidavit, Al-Jaouni said Tim Gant made his last rent payment in May 2008. At the time, Gant told Al-Jaouni his family never moved into the house and only rented it so their son could attend Northern. In April of this year, the Lamot family tried to rent the same house.

In another affidavit, Carla Alphin, chief investigator for the school system, recalls knocking on the door of a modest white clapboard house on Spencer-Dixon Road. The house, directly across the street from Northern Guilford, was rented by Marian Lamot — Asad Lamot’s mother, according to Northern Guilford records.

The woman who met Alphin at the door was gruff, according to Alphin. She said she was the Lamots’ housekeeper and that the family was not home. Alphin, who noticed a girl standing in the hallway, handed the woman a business card and told her to have Marian Lamot call her.

When Marian Lamot didn’t call, Alphin returned early the next day. Only this time she parked her car across the road. Minutes later, the woman claiming to be the Lamots’ housekeeper came outside in a house coat to dump garbage into a trash can, according to Alphin. Later that morning the landlord and a middle school-aged girl showed up and entered the house without knocking.

Finally, Asad Lamot showed up in a car and knocked on the front door of the home before someone let him in. Lamot stayed for a few minutes before crossing the street to start the school day.

The next day, April 10, Marian Lamot tried to rent Al-Jaouni’s home on North Church Street — the house that previously had been rented by the Gant family.

According to another affidavit, Al-Jaouni said Lamot seemed eager to rent the house that day, even though the house was in the midst of major renovations and had no appliances.

By then it was too late. Northern Guilford principal Joe Yeager and Athletics Director Derrell Force had resigned from the school that afternoon. And Guilford County Schools officials announced they were investigating the eligibility of several student-athletes.

Contact Robert Bell at 373-7055 or robert.bell@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Northern Guilford High School

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Laura

August 27, 2009 - 9:05 am EDT

The amount of resources devoted to combatting corruption in high school sports will not end here. We're going to see this happening more and more, because parents, and the business community are just nutty about sports. I feel sorry for these kids who are learning to lie and cheat from coaches and parents. It just goes to further prove what a huge drain extra-curricular team sports are on education. I wish more taxpayers would see what a waste it is.

We shouldn't have to subsidize entertainment for sports-crazed families, and we shouldn't have to subsidize parents' unrealistic dreams that their little prince or princess will one day be a wealthy professional athlete. Get team sports out of high school, and let parents form clubs and pay for it on their own.

Panacea

August 27, 2009 - 9:30 am EDT

I used to think sports still had a place in public schools, but when I see the extent to which the families have gone to cheat and game the system, it only leads me to the same conclusion you have, Laura.

Andrew Brod

August 27, 2009 - 10:57 am EDT

I usually agree with Panacea, but not here. If the corrupt acts of these parents damn all high-school sports, then do a few instances of corporate corruption damn the free-enterprise system? Of course not. Does corruption by a few politicians damn democracy? Of course not. But what we know about human nature is that there will always be some people who try to game the system. Thanks to this investigation, GCS is instituting some sensible new rules (which probably should have been in place long ago, but you do what you can), and I like what I've read so far about the new sportsmanship initiative. Sports are tools for teaching values to young people, and they're fun. The Northern fiasco is a teaching opportunity, so let's not blow it by overreacting.

dcolin

August 27, 2009 - 6:37 pm EDT

BS

Read the document people are asked to sign.
Read it.

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 8:49 pm EDT

Laura
What about those kids in individual sports such as swimming,track,cross country,wrestling,tennis or golf? If you get your way should these innocent athletes from nonrevenue sports( that can also help pay for college) suffer?
Think about it.Do you have children?

booBORO

August 27, 2009 - 9:28 am EDT

I agree 100% I was involved with high school sports here in Greensboro and every coach had their favorites and everyone wanted the great athletes to go places and maybe even put a little spotlight on their high school. If parents truely want their kids to aspire to become their own retirement nest egg with the big leagues, than let these parents invest their own money similar to an ira. There are too many other school activities that taxpayers should pay for, not this junk!

Mick

August 27, 2009 - 10:05 am EDT

You folks do realize there are thousands upon thousands of high school athletes (and their families) that DO NOT in any way resemble your very negative and just plain mean (I'll add ignorant as well) stereotypes. Only a few kids out of hundreds of athletes were exposed at NG after an apparently very forensic investigation. Obviously some of those 12 (ie basketball and probably football, baseball types as well) kids did illegally transfer to NG specifically for sports. However, even some of those 12 transfered because they preferred NG for any number of reasons to their home schools and then played sports in their natural (though illegal) course of high school life. As we have discussed here before there are most likely numerous non-athletes attending schools illegally all across the county. You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise and you are also fooling yourself is you think some kid illegally attended NG just to be a JV cheerleader or swimmer. Also, you guys and gals are just as out of touch as you sound if you really believe all or even the majority of those thousands of high school athletes (and their parents) are participating soley for the chance at a college and pro athletic careers. Many kids and families play sports for all the right reasons. I guess that is something you egg heads just dont and wont understand. Your loss.

Are there problems. Are there kids/families just as you see them.... unfortunately so. It would be silly of me to think or say otherwise. Almost as silly and unrealistic as the first post on this thread.

TOTHE POINT

August 27, 2009 - 10:06 am EDT

I think all three of you are out to lunch and maybe out to dinner as well! A High School team whether it be basketball, baseball, football or tennis has from 7 to 80 kids on their rosters and those kids are represented by parents who want to see them participate. You can not tell me that all of them (parents) are seeking to have their kid win a professonal contract. So why don't you stop highlighting a very small minority of athletes and parents and stop wishing for something that is not going to happen. A large number of those parents could not afford to pay for the setup you are recommending so what would they do? You argument sound very similar to the health care argument that is going on.... not all people can afford to pay for health care and not all parents can afford to pay to have their kids take part in extracurricular activities. Those same parent who may not be able to afford extracurricular activities may not even care or are seeking to have their child sign a pro-contract. So for you to say that (or to give the impression) that athletics is nothing but a pro-contract proving ground is stupid and at best uninformed. All you need to do is to look at the number of athletes from ping-pong player to football players in your Guilford School District and see how many acturally go on to even play college sports more or less get a pro-contract. I got news for you your district is not setting the world on fire with athletes signing Division I scholarship offers or even going on to play pro ball in any sport. You need to stop knocking athletics and support participation with your tax dollars so that those who do not care about the pros can have an outlet. Otherwise you may find that their outlet is the jail cell.

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 2:54 pm EDT

As usual TOTHE POINT is on point.We are not going to drop sports from Guilford County Schools.Those that think we are have no clue.For every negative situation like this one with Northern Guilford there are thousands of positive athletic situations taking place. Those of you that feel so strongly about eliminating athletics should get off your tails and run for school board with that as your platform.Just posting on this site gives you ABSOLUTELY NO POWER TO ELIMINATE ATHLETICS.Also getting rid of sports due to the Northern Guilford scandal makes about as much sense as getting rid of highways and automobiles due to those violating traffic laws. Teaching and coaching is my profession and it has allowed me to make a decent living and raise 2 children that were/are both high academic students and good athletes.College athletics saved me about $40,000 in college tuition for my oldest child.At this time 4 schools have contacted my youngest(a high school senior) about athletics for next year. I know that I am not the only parent that has gained from his/her children participating in athletics. Don't any of you athletics naysayers have a clue as to how supporters of athletics in schools will push to keep them. New sports are being added all the time at these GCS schools. In the past 25 years our school has gone from having 13 varsity teams to now having 18. This does not include the JV teams.Other schools have some sports that we do not have.Sports teams numbers are increasing all over GCS.Don't you understand that by GCS putting in new policies about athletics regulation that athletics are here to stay.

dcolin

August 27, 2009 - 8:12 pm EDT

"there are thousands of positive athletic situations taking place"
What are you talking about. "Positive athletic situations"

They are just play, recess whatever. No more no less.
I don't want to get rid of sports but I am tired of the BS.

The important issues like EOC and EOG are horrible.

We graduate lots of kids that can't read on a high school level, and can't do single digit arithmetic in
their head.

In fact the colleges actually accept many of them especially if they are good at sports.

dcolin

August 27, 2009 - 8:19 pm EDT

Dave,

This all sounds good. However remember.
If you don't make the team you don't get to play.
So parents who's kids don't make the team do have a point.

Every one who wants to take algebra gets to take algebra.
Not so with basketball.

I am sure you have an answer for those parents

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 9:11 pm EDT

I actually get some of your point dcolin. There are some sports that cut kids from the team due to lack of ability such as basketball or baseball.These teams would be next to impossible to coach with too many players so I do understand why they do cut. I happen to coach sports that do not cut. I only terminate kids that have a poor work ethic or attitude. In 28 years I have cut 14 kids from all the teams I have coached. That is cutting one kid every other year and since 1986 I have coached 3 sports each school year.I don't have the heart to coach a sport that would require me to tell a kid that he or she is just not a good enough athlete to make my team. I recruit(within my own school of course) good kids and often the high academic ones since they will have the best focus and work ethic.Also I won't have to worry about them being eligible.Often they have no desire to continue sports in college but like to have the fact that they participated while in high school on college applications. I also do get a few to go on to the collegiate level from time to time.I have also had kids come to my teams from the revenue sports where they were cut or sat the bench and have had success with us.I don't think you realize that not every team in high school has to cut.

dcolin

August 27, 2009 - 10:51 pm EDT

Only the ones the kids really want to play on.

Basketball, Football, Baseball.

What do you coach?

DaveW

August 28, 2009 - 10:52 am EDT

I prefer not to state which sports I coach. However at my school we DO NOT cut in football.We also rarely cut in soccer(only if we have more kids try out than we have varsity and JV uniforms).

baseballcoach

August 28, 2009 - 11:22 am EDT

several area high schools do not cut in football. if they have more players come out than they have equipment for, they just raise the money (thru fundraising, not tax dollars) and buy the equipment. although playing time may be hard to obtain, many high school football coaches believe as long as you meet the eligibility requirements and are willing to put in the work, you will have a roster spot. in fact, one area high school currently has several players on the JV team that never made their middle school team (that program did indeed cut players due to a limited amount of equipment).

dcolin

August 28, 2009 - 12:24 pm EDT

My point is that many parents think it's unfair to have a program all kids can't get to play.
Especially when money is tight for education.

Unlike everyone who wants algebra gets algebra.

Now I don't have problem with it but they do have a point.

The same with college entrance. Many athletes get accepted and better students turned down.
That upsets lots of people ( especially tax supported schools )

dcolin

August 27, 2009 - 6:39 pm EDT

Read the honor code document.
It is absurd.

Panacea

August 27, 2009 - 10:24 am EDT

School sports have been corrupted and tainted. It only takes a few rotten apples to spoil the whole barrel.

What really bothers me is the parents of the kids who ARE honest are not tar and feathering the parents responsible for this mess, and Stan Kowalewski as well. That lack of outrage on the part of other parents is perplexing.

Mick

August 27, 2009 - 11:47 am EDT

School sports have not been corrupted and tainted by the actions of a literal handful of students. Black eye, yes. I just hope we can learn from all of this.

But I do agree that I too am confused by the lack of justifiable outrage coming from NG parents. Maybe they just want it to go away. I am even more amazed at the few NG parents who have tried to justify this crap.

baseballcoach

August 27, 2009 - 1:47 pm EDT

well, you would have to find these parents before you could do anything to them, and from reading the article, finding them can be a pretty tough task, especially for someone who is not an investigator. seriously, i have talked to some of the "honest" parents, and for the most part, they just want this situation to be put in the past so they, and most importantly their children, can move forward without this cloud hanging over them.

CherylP25

August 27, 2009 - 10:59 am EDT

I heard a rumor that Middle School Sports will be eliminated next year due to budget cuts. I'm not saying it's reliable or from a well placed source, just that someone told me that. Has anyone else heard this rumor?

baseballcoach

August 27, 2009 - 11:32 am EDT

do away with middle school sports and the money you save will be spent 5 times over on additional SRO's. last time i checked, the SRO's don't come cheap. and do not even think about the possibility of eliminating both middle school sports and SRO's (i have heard that rumor as well). we want schools in which the students who do want an education can attend without constant fears of riots and such.

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 2:55 pm EDT

baseball coach
You have hit a homerun with your point about SRO's.

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 3:04 pm EDT

Just some middle school sports are gone.Boys volleyball and golf.All other sports will continue.

rooster8786

August 27, 2009 - 11:21 am EDT

3 thoughts: 1. That all the hard working, play by the rules individuals involved at Northern are not up in arms is an outrage. 2. How long until the race card gets played? 3. If the school system can spend this much time and energy on this investigation, how come they can't redirect a little of the effort to cutting costs and improving students?

overstartover

August 27, 2009 - 3:55 pm EDT

Many of the families of Northern High School continue to embarassed and frustrated by the on-going attention aimed at the school by some really dishonest adults. Many of us have chosen to remain quiet, while hoping this would all eventually go away, so we could move forward. But it just keeps hanging around. We now have in place a very focused principal and he is doing his best to move the school and most importantly the students forward... "while focusing on doing it the right way". We all need to accept and recognize that a select group of parents will continue to "shop" their athletes around and when necessary they will cheat and lie to accomplish their personal goals. The Lamonts and the Gants knew exactly what they were doing and so did the leadership of Northern. Central in all of this was the wonderful basketball coach - who during the season told these two players to make sure they went to their "Northern homes because I think we are being watched". Yet to this day, this individual along with many other adults refuse to be held accountable. What a sad, pathetic message we are sending to our children.The GCS transfer rule is a fantastic first step in stopping the madness. Schools should remain focused on academics first and foremost and never forget athletics are extra-curricular activities for our children's enjoyment and personal growth.

DaveW

August 27, 2009 - 6:33 pm EDT

Good post overstartover

stopshopping

August 28, 2009 - 9:37 am EDT

Very good comments from someone who is seeing this from the inside. However, I wish that more people who saw what was going on from the beginning would have spoken up.

As we see with the recent transfer, some are still shopping their kids instead of insisting that they work hard in the classroom.

RCRD

August 27, 2009 - 10:24 pm EDT

Now the North Carolina High School Athletic Association needs to follow Guilford County's lead and hand down similar rules for every school under their umbrella. They can begin with banning non-public schools such as Cardinal Gibbons and Bishop McGuiness from participating in state playoffs. Maybe schools like Northern Guilford could argue: "If Cardinal Gibbons can draw student-athletes from anywhere, any district, why can't we?"

eduguytoo

August 28, 2009 - 12:23 am EDT

I am eternally grateful for the two families from NG who recently sued the system. Apparently the only way that a lot of this stuff ever saw the light of day (specifically the details reported in the article printed today) is because it became public record with court filings. Honestly, couldn't the Guilford County Schools have disclosed more details about the investigation weeks back (without using specific names)? Instead, this stewpot of innuendo and venom has been allowed to continue to boil. I'd say that with what was revealed today, there is very little doubt that deception and subterfuge were at work at NG. I continue to contend that few if any high schools across the county could stand up to the same scrutiny as NG and be found faultless for athletic eligibility. Some of that would, doubtless, involve the same types of conniving parents as the NG investigation has revealed. But let's not forget that the board of education isn't blameless in this, either. Through its history of granting waivers for students to switch from schools of assignment, the board issues "get-out-of-jail-free" cards. Believe me, it happens.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search