news-record.com

OPINION

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Editorial: UNC exceeds its limit

Thursday, August 27, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

The five starting players on the UNC Tar Heels' national championship basketball team this year came from New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Missouri and California.

Carolina's outstanding basketball program always attracts top players from across the country. The same is true of classroom stars. Half the university's Morehead-Cain scholars are residents of other states. Overall, the average SAT score for out-of-state students in last year's freshman class in Chapel Hill was 1341, compared to 1293 for North Carolina residents.

When it comes to athletics and academics, the university can draw from a larger talent pool beyond the borders of North Carolina. But state policies set a limit on that: No more than 18 percent of freshmen throughout the University of North Carolina system should be out-of-state residents.

Two exceptions were made when the policy was set in 1998, one for the School of the Arts and the other for the engineering program at N.C. A&T.

Pushed by athletics boosters at UNC-CH and N.C. State, however, the legislature allowed another exception in 2005. Out-of-state recipients of athletic and academic scholarships are counted as in-state students for enrollment and tuition purposes. This exception costs taxpayers more than $10 million a year, which is bad enough. It also cuts enrollment opportunities for residents. In Chapel Hill alone, a few dozen each year lose places to the additional out-of-state students admitted.

UNC-CH's official out-of-state enrollment last year was 17.2 percent of the freshman class. The true number, counting 94 scholarship students classified as in-state under the exception, was 19.6 percent. That should have been considered a violation of the cap.

Out-of-state enrollment generally has held steady throughout the UNC system at about 14 percent over the last decade. During that time, thousands more places have been created for North Carolina residents as demand has increased. The state must provide higher education for more of its people. While it's good to include out-of-state students in the mix, particularly those with exceptional abilities, the university's primary mission is to serve the people of North Carolina.

The UNC Board of Governors has discussed raising the 18 percent cap in the past. An inducement to do that, besides drawing from a wider talent pool, is to collect higher out-of-state tuition rates from more students. That benefit is lost, however, when out-of-state students are counted as residents.

Just as regrettable is the backdoor means of awarding coveted classroom space, that ought to belong to residents, to out-of-state students instead.

The legislature this year failed to approve a remedy, but the Board of Governors should police enrollment more strictly anyway. As proven by such examples as former homegrown basketball stars Phil Ford, James Worthy and Michael Jordan -- and chemistry whiz-turned-chancellor Holden Thorp -- North Carolina isn't lacking in talent.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Panacea

August 27, 2009 - 10:21 am EDT

Agreed. If my tax dollars have to support out of state athletes, then I insist that the classroom seats meant for North Carolinians are kept for North Carolinians.

mule4ever

August 27, 2009 - 1:22 pm EDT

Representative Harrison, is that you?

The common sense element to this discussion is that for men's and women's basketball and football, those same out of state elite athletes help to bring in millions of dollars through television contracts to their respective schools. If we were only able to recruit athletes from NC, we would obviously be at a competitive disadvantage and would therefore not command top dollar for our contracts.

I guess the writer of this editorial would also say that giving a $100,000 tax incentive to a company that provided millions back in taxes over time would be a bad idea as well. Way to be short sighted.

igliigli

August 29, 2009 - 1:39 am EDT

Sorry, but the schools do not get millions from sports. The sports teams operate at a loss of over 200 million every year. And in-state and out-of-state athletes SAT scores are hundreds of points lower than the rest of the student body. The schools are rejecting qualified students for non academically qualified athletes.

DaveW

August 29, 2009 - 7:40 am EDT

A statistic failed to be mentioned is that the subgroup of all athletes(not just football and men's basketball)have a higher graduation rate compared to the rest of the student bodies as a whole at NCAA member institutions.
Source: NCAA

DaveW

August 29, 2009 - 3:53 pm EDT

I don't know how much they get from sports. I do know that NC State sold out ALL of their home games again this football season.That is revenue coming into Wake County. Think about it.

Interested

August 27, 2009 - 9:34 pm EDT

While your argument may well be true in terms of the football or basketball teams, there are many more athletes not generating revenue. And does the reduced tuition rate really affect recruiting efforts, or does it help the boosters?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: LIGHT RAIN
  • Current Temperature: 37°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 37° L: 24°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search