news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: UNC's weight problem

Saturday, August 22, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

Good thing some very smart people work for the University of North Carolina.

It may take all of their collective brainpower to explain how the 17 UNC campuses nearly doubled the ranks of their top administrators over the last five years, even as budgets tightened and the economy soured.

Growth in administrators has, in fact, outpaced both the growth in faculty numbers and student enrollment on UNC campuses, reports The News & Observer of Raleigh.

UNCG, The News & Observer added, increased positions whose job titles included the words "provost" or "chancellor" the most. Those jobs doubled to 50 at UNCG, and total administrative positions grew on the campus by 71 percent in five years.

UNCG officials attribute much of the increase to the school's explosive enrollment growth, which will reach nearly 18,000 this semester, a new capital campaign and more research grants.

In an interview Thursday, Chancellor Linda Brady said the university still ranks academics as the top spending priority. Thus, academic affairs had seen smaller budget cuts (8.9 percent) than other areas, including business affairs (10.5 percent), information technology (10.5 percent) and university advancement (13.5 percent).

Sponsored research, she said, grew by 20 percent between 2000 and 2008, creating a need for proper oversight. "We spend a tremendous amount of time making sure that we're in compliance," she said.

Brady also noted that even where an administrator was added in IT, the department's management was actually reduced through the elimination of a supervisory position.

Other campuses may cite similar cases. But the numbers simply are too high, and some positions are much harder to defend. For instance, how to account for N.C. State's employment of 100 communication specialists?

Overall in the UNC system, positions containing the titles "provost" or "chancellor" swelled from 312 in 2005 to 418 in 2008. The results mirror an earlier report that found the flagship campus, UNC-Chapel Hill, spent more of its $2 billion budget on administrative costs than on classrooms.

To their credit, UNC leaders seem fully aware that this needs to change as the system seeks to cut $73 million in spending this year.

"If you are looking at the cuts we are making, they are heavily, heavily weighted on the administrative side," UNC President Erskine Bowles told The News & Observer.

And that's as it should be. The core mission of these institutions is teaching, research and scholarship, not building bigger bureaucracies.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

igliigli

August 22, 2009 - 8:53 am EDT

The growth and cost in UNC administrators is tiny compared to the growth and costs in coaches. Why does UNC require multiple basketball coaches or multiple football coaches? And what classes are they teaching? None are listed in the UNC class schedule. The coaches and sports teams are the real taxpayer rip-off

Panacea

August 22, 2009 - 10:27 am EDT

There may be waste in sports, but it pales compared to the waste in administration. Lets not confuse one issue with another.

igliigli

August 23, 2009 - 7:14 am EDT

Not a single UNC administrator is paid by the taxpayer a million plus dollars a year to sell shoes.
What a rip-off.

DaveW

August 23, 2009 - 10:09 am EDT

The taxpayers do not pay them to sell shoes. They negotiate a separate shoe contract with Nike, Addidas, Puma ect.The University has nothing to do with shoe contracts except to agree to one. The school wins out in that they actually SAVE money on shoes and gear for their athletes. I know this because my daughter was an athlete at a UNC system school.

DaveW

August 22, 2009 - 10:01 am EDT

Visit ANY high school or college football coach and see what is involved.You won't do that because ignorance is bliss.There are maybe 100 football players at many of these schools. One person cannot coach 100 people. Most football coaching staff's have 8 or 9 coaches.

DaveW

August 22, 2009 - 4:13 pm EDT

Maybe academia should model its hiearchy with athletics.At most Universities there is at most, one athletic director and one assistant AD. Compare that to all the coaches of all the sports that ACTUALLY WORK with student/athletes on a daily basis.

igliigli

August 23, 2009 - 7:17 am EDT

Know dozens of coaches who coach over a 200+ players by themselves.
The college and HS school coaches who claim that's too many are not telling the truth.
In other words, fat and waste on a breathtaking scale.

DaveW

August 23, 2009 - 10:04 am EDT

Who coaches 200 players by themselves? What team has 200 players in any sport?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search