news-record.com

OPINION

Market changes affect Postal Service

Friday, August 21, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

Counterpoint:

By Ronald L. White
 

This is in response to the mention of changes to letter carrier Robert McCance’s delivery route in your Aug. 8 edition.
As you and your readers may know, the U.S. Postal Service is experiencing financial difficulties because of declining mail volume and loss of revenue. We expect a decline of 20 billion pieces of mail by the end of this fiscal year.

First-class mail has seen a decline because of the use of the Internet and fewer mailings by industries impacted by the recession (financial, mortgage, banking and insurance).

The Postal Service employs more than 280,000 mail carriers who deliver to more than 149 million homes, businesses and post office boxes. At the beginning of the year we notified customers that the Postal Service was making adjustments to carrier routes because of the unprecedented drop in mail volume and advances in mail processing technology.

We have been able to adjust mail delivery routes and eliminate the pivoting of routes (carriers delivering other routes or parts of other routes after their regular route is completed), and match the deliveries with the actual mail volume.

In Greensboro, we reviewed 200 routes and made adjustments that would be cost-effective while maintaining customer service.

We are extremely proud of the fact that our customers are fond of their mail carriers and consider them part of the community. While the adjustment to McCance’s route means that portions of his route will change, he will undoubtedly earn the praises of his new customers who are also experiencing a change in carriers.

And, we are confident that the carrier who will now deliver to portions of McCance’s former route will measure up to our customers’ expectations.

I’d like to thank Greensboro customers for their confidence in our letter carriers and assure them that we will continue to focus on providing excellent customer service.

The writer is Greensboro postmaster.

Comments

This letter has been closed to new comments. Comments are accepted on select letters to the editor between the hours of 7 AM and 5 PM, EDT, Monday through Friday.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

J D R

August 21, 2009 - 8:10 am EDT

The U.S. Postal Service is experiencing financial difficulties for one reason only:

They do not charge enough for the service. Consider they are perhaps 1/10th the cost of FedX and UPS for letter deliveries, and competative on parcel deliveries. Of course Congress would let the rates go up - it is Republican Interests to "let them fail" so they can claim "Another Failed Government Program, let's convert everything to Private Industries" which of course would remove a major competator got FedX and UPS. It is Democrat Interests to "keep costs low for the people" which feeds into "let them fail" .. heck its Win Win for both parties of Congress.

ghost from white oak

August 21, 2009 - 10:11 am EDT

Please, continue I have my hip boots on this morning!

J D R

August 21, 2009 - 2:22 pm EDT

Please come back with a thoughtful response or keep wading in until the hip boots fill with water.

It is SO easy to respond to something with mindless nothing.

You disagree .. put up.
The alternative rhymes.

tahoeman1971

August 21, 2009 - 8:54 am EDT

Deliver mail 3 or 4 days a week instead of 6. There is absolutely nothing that comes to my mailbox that I have to have every day but Sunday. This change would surely impact the postal services lack of profitability.

J D R

August 21, 2009 - 2:06 pm EDT

I doubt it. If you mean follow the walmart model and work people part time for years so you need pay no benefits .. you'd save some .. but the infrastructure (trucks, buildings, equipment) needs to be paid for whether you use it or not.

tahoeman1971

August 21, 2009 - 5:11 pm EDT

Not at all JDR. I mean work 4 10 hour days and call it a week. If you have too many employees for your workload and are losing money in the private sector you fire people. The postal service should be no different. I respect the hell out of you and your opinions, but I can't for the life of me figure out why you are so inclined to defend the postal service like you do.

J D R

August 21, 2009 - 6:59 pm EDT

Well first off thank you for the kind words. Second, I do not defent the way the post office does business .. they are ruels and regulation crazy to the point they drive their employees postal ... you know what I mean.

But

The reason they are "broke" is so freaking obvious it is impossible not to state. What troubles me most is the lack of pushback on my position .. which may be "original" .. but jeeze I'm a pretty normal person and it is so freaking obvious ... I think it is both everyone else cannot dispute it and they are so freaking hung up proving all government is a failure ...

danagain

August 21, 2009 - 9:13 pm EDT

I love my postal carrier, even though she's a govt. employee she's a conservative ;-- )

That being said JDR, I will agree with you, sending a letter from here to Alaska for for 44 cents is a deal.

tahoeman1971

August 22, 2009 - 12:58 am EDT

No JDR, you are wrong on this point. The postal service may charge 44 cents to deliver a standard postal item within 7 to 10 days. They however charge 17 dollars to deliver next day which is no better than UPS or FedEx which charge the same amount. However, if I want delivery confirmation from the USPS they charge another 3 dollars which FedEx and UPS do not charge. Show me the comparative reality.

truth

August 21, 2009 - 1:52 pm EDT

Sounds like they are doing some of the things they need to be doing. Redesigning routes would seem necessary if mail volume is decreasing. Lay-offs or at least hiring freezes would also seem imminent. Why would you need to have the same staff if mail volume is decreasing significantly.

I tend to pay most of my bills online. It's good for the environment and makes good financial sense. I have a good mail carrier. He delivers my mail (nearly) every day that he is supposed to. I once had a bad mail carrier who I knew did not come to my mailbox every day (even when I had the red flag up). Thankfully, I've moved and he didn't follow me.

People willingly pay more to Fed EX and UPS because they have more confidence that their packages will get there in a timely fashion. Also, when it comes to larger packages, non-postal carriers are often competitive in price. If the post office could deliver a letter overnight with a cost lower than Fed Ex (consistently), people would use them.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search