news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Probe will shed light on death in jail

Friday, August 21, 2009
(Updated Monday, August 24 - 1:12 pm)

 

What we know is that a 38-year-old inmate in the Guilford County jail in Greensboro died after being Tasered by a guard during an altercation. And that's all we know.

Only after thorough investigations by the N.C. State Medical Examiner's Office and the State Bureau of Investigation will what happened and why come into focus.

According to the Guilford County Sheriff's Office, Ronald Eugene Cobbs scuffled with detention personnel late Tuesday night during a search for contraband. He allegedly resisted and assaulted an officer, who then shot him with a Taser.

Following departmental policy, Cobbs was seen by an on-duty nurse. He became unconscious and was taken by EMS to Moses Cone Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

Law enforcement's use of Tasers that temporarily immobilize with a 50,000-volt electric shock remains controversial. When used properly, proponents say, they're a more humane way to subdue a person than nightsticks or pepper spray. Their use can be especially effective in jails where crowded and stressful conditions can ignite tempers that explode in conflict.

But critics counter that too little is known about both a Taser's short- and long-term effects. The instant immobilization, they contend, can result in falls that cause serious injury.

Generally speaking, Tasers, sometimes called stun guns, are used sparingly here. Earlier this month, the sheriff's office reported that from January to June of this year only 11 of 114 reported use-of-force incidents at the Greensboro and High Point jails involved Tasers. And until Tuesday, neither the jails nor patrol division ever had a fatality associated with one.

However, it's worth noting that the downsides are enough for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to ban, at least for now, their use in local detention facilities participating in the federal 287(g) program for housing immigration detainees.

Uppermost must be the safety of both inmates and jail employees. Sheriff BJ Barnes has said that the mere presence of Tasers in the county's jails helps defuse potential confrontations.

Other factors also must be considered. The jail was well over capacity Tuesday, and overcrowding only leads to trouble. Moving ahead promptly with construction of a new downtown facility is bound to help.

And Cobbs, who faced serious charges of kidnapping and robbery, reportedly had been in local custody for about a year. That's hardly in keeping with his right to a speedy trial.

Hopefully, the SBI's eventual findings in this case will lend clarity to both this tragedy and the broader Taser debate.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Panacea

August 21, 2009 - 7:59 am EDT

Cobb probably waived his right to a speedy trial to allow his defense attorney time to prepare a defense.

I've worked in corrections. "Altercation" usually means a down and out dirty fight. The violence can be unbelievable. Correctional officers can and do get hurt.

I don't think there is really a debate about Tasers. They work. But they are a use of force, and ANY use of force has a potential downside, including serious injury and death. To think they don't is naive. So does piling on top of an inmate and using direct physical force, so does the use of pepper spray (I accidentally got sprayed once when an inmate became violent in medical--NOT a pleasant experience).

J Peterman Reality Tour

August 21, 2009 - 8:27 am EDT

Did you see this guys record . . . no big loss he's gone, wish it had happened sooner.

Wiley

August 21, 2009 - 8:19 pm EDT

You sound like you need to have a golf club to take a reality tour through your head. It's not very nice to wish people to die, I'm sure someone cared about the dude.

sharon wiley

August 21, 2009 - 6:45 pm EDT

j peterman you're a total idiot !!!

J Peterman Reality Tour

August 21, 2009 - 7:44 pm EDT

Thanky, Iz callz 'em likes I seez um . . . raise a powerful fistz to the Lawdy abovez . . .

sharon wiley

August 21, 2009 - 8:23 pm EDT

j peterson,
You have a screw loose in that head of yours.

gsostudent

August 22, 2009 - 12:37 am EDT

Tasers are supposed to be non-lethal but they've killed plenty of people around the country. And he was in court AWAITING trial? Just another example of blatant misconduct by law enforcement that will go unchecked. Is the officer even suspended? Doubtful.

I have a great idea- let's cut funding for our schools, do nothing to protect families from job loss and poverty, and then put all the criminals our society creates in for profit prisons! Ah, damn, somebody already thought of that.

"Ain't it funny how the factory's doors close 'round the time that the school doors close? 'Round the time that the doors on the jail cell open up to greet you?" -Zack de la Rocha

Voice of Reason

August 22, 2009 - 9:59 am EDT

TASERs have NOT killed "plenty" of people around the country. That is just an ignorant statement. TASERs may have been a contributing factor in the death of someone escaping or eluding custody or resisting, but they were not the cause of death. Period. TASERs are listed as "less than lethal" and "less deadly." This does not mean, however, that serious injury or death is not possible, just as using pepper spray can lead to death under the right circumstances. And the previous methods of gaining compliance, batons and clubs, well I think the danger of serious injury or death there are pretty obvious.

This death is tragic, certainly, but the bottom line is, if you resist or fight or flee the police, you have brought upon the use of force. Mr. Cobbs was resisting according to this article, he had assaulted the detention officer, and he was trying to keep the detention officer from retrieving contraband from his cell. I'd bet my lunch that when the final report is released on this incident that contrband is cited as the cause of death. I have no pity for Mr. Cobbs. As for the detention officer being suspended, why the heck should he be suspended? He did nothing wrong! Where was the "blatant misconduct" here? There was none, the detention officer did his job correctly, therefore he should not be suspended. And it will be investigated by the SBI- try reading the whole article next time.

Funny how society created this criminal. I guess free will doesn't exist in this country; we predetermined that Mr. Cobbs would commit robbery and go a-kidnapping. Sorry, that doesn't fly. Mr. Cobbs made bad decisions in his life, most recently assaulting and resisting a detention officer. I'm sure it was the last of many.

If you really want to know how a TASER works, want to know how it was developed, tested, and perfected- if you want to see a scientific study on it's use and risks, check out the December 2007 issue of Spectrum magazine (http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/consumer-electronics/gadgets/how-a-taser-wo...). Make sure to read all three pages.

The bottom line is this, gsostudent, people commit crimes, they get arrested for them, go to jail for them. They put themselves in the position they are in. If they resist the law, at whatever point in the process, they will be brought under control. This has been done for years, and for years serious injuries and deaths have occurred as a result. With today's technology, however, there are much fewer serious injuries and deaths than in years past. The TASER is an extremely useful tool that keeps prisoners, and more importantly, police and detention officers, from getting seriously injured. They can be used from safe distances so the officer is out of harm's way, and many times just the threat of it's use is enough to gain compliance. To ignore them now would be a step backward for law enforcement.

Oh, and last time I checked, the County Jail was NOT a for-profit prison.

Panacea

August 22, 2009 - 10:29 am EDT

I'm sure the officer is suspended. Anytime there is a death in law enforcement, the officer goes on paid administrative leave while the investigation takes place.

Voice of Reason

August 22, 2009 - 1:54 pm EDT

Paid administrative leave? Yes. Suspended? No. Not the same thing at all.

Panacea

August 22, 2009 - 6:37 pm EDT

You're right. They are not.

The officer is likely on paid administrative leave, and not suspended . . . and he shouldn't be until the investigation has been completed. Until the investigation has been completed, innocent until proven guilty.

Lakeshia

August 22, 2009 - 9:18 am EDT

And another reprobate we no longer have to fear, worry about, and pay for -

flight105

August 22, 2009 - 2:43 pm EDT

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

honestcitizen

August 22, 2009 - 3:45 pm EDT

I will have to agree, one less thief off the street, one less to feed, and shelter. Why do people keep taking
up up for crooks

Panacea

August 22, 2009 - 6:39 pm EDT

While odds are this guy was a waste of space breathing air better used by you and me, the fact of the matter is there are plenty of innocent people in prison. That's why we have these little procedures called investigations and trials.

sharon wiley

August 22, 2009 - 9:04 pm EDT

What goes around comes Around. You're talking trash about a human being , what about his family's sorrow?
I wonder who will be next ?Maybe you or someone you love!!!!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search