news-record.com

OPINION

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Doug Clark: Take a direct approach to racial justice

Wednesday, August 19, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

 

State legislators and Gov. Bev Perdue should play it straight about the death penalty: Just put an end to it.

There are too many problems with implementation, too much inconsistency in application. Public opinion is slowly turning against it and juries are more reluctant to impose it. It's time to replace capital punishment with life in prison without parole.

Creating the Racial Justice Act simply adds more confusion and inequity.

When Perdue signed the bill into law last week, she declared it ensures that when "our most heinous criminals" are given the death penalty -- which she says she supports -- the decision is based "on the facts and the law, not racial prejudice."

That's a fine objective, but the Racial Justice Act offers no such assurance.

There's no question that "racial prejudice" has accounted for shameful injustices. But the answer to disparate treatment in the courts based on racial prejudice is not to require disparate treatment based on racial distinctions. That's what this law does.

It allows a judge to prohibit a capital prosecution or overturn a death sentence if the defendant shows statistically that death sentences were sought or imposed "significantly more frequently" against persons of his race within the county, prosecutorial district, judicial division or state.

What is "significantly more frequently" is not defined.

What is clear is that the death penalty decision need not have anything to do with the defendant's case. He may have committed the most horrifying, vicious, detestable murder imaginable, yet he will be able to present himself as a potential victim of racial discrimination if the death penalty has been imposed "significantly more frequently" against members of his race.

Black offenders make up 54 percent of the 163 men and women on North Carolina's Death Row, far out of proportion to their numbers in the general population. That alone may be viewed as "proof" of racial discrimination.

Because of this law, everyone on Death Row is entitled to seek relief on the grounds that race was a "significant factor" in the imposition of the sentence.

Even some white offenders might have a case because the law also recognizes that there's a correlation between death sentences and the race of the victim.

There is, when the victims are white. So even white Death Row inmates, if their victims were white, may claim racial injustice.

No wonder prosecutors opposed this bill. It's going to set off a slew of time-consuming, costly and confusing legal actions and create several tiers of Death Row justice.

If you're white and your victim was black, you're probably staying on Death Row. Justice was done.

If you're black and your victim was white, you'll probably see your sentence commuted to life in prison. You were discriminated against.

If you're black and your victim was black, or you're white and your victim was white, you're somewhere in the middle. As for other races, there's probably not enough statistical evidence to determine the amount of racial discrimination you experienced in court.

Regarding new prosecutions, the Eve Carson case could be a test for the Racial Justice Act but for an unusual twist. The white UNC student was kidnapped, robbed and murdered in Chapel Hill last year. Two young black men are charged. One, Demario Atwater, is old enough to face the death penalty. The Orange County district attorney said he will seek a capital prosecution. The Racial Justice Act would give Atwater the chance to contend his prosecution was motivated by race, not the actual crimes.

Back in January, however, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it would seek the death penalty under federal law. It looks as if the federal case will proceed first, and the state's Racial Justice Act will have no bearing on it.

It all leaves too much to chance and potential manipulation. The death penalty has never been administered evenhandedly and without error. It can't be. And let's not deceive ourselves. The state will never execute all 163 individuals living on Death Row today. Maybe a handful.

So what's really going to be gained by having dozens of "racial justice" hearings at who-knows-what cost?

Here's my suggestion. Gov. Perdue should commute the sentences of every last one of them, all 163, white, black, Hispanic, whatever, to life in prison without parole.

Now that's the direct approach to racial justice.

 

Contact Doug Clark at 373-7039 or dgclark@news-record.com.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Get A Clue

August 19, 2009 - 7:04 am EDT

To borrow a bumper sticker phrase, why do we kill people to show that killing people is a bad thing?
We are the state, and when the state chooses to get into the business of killing its citizens we should at the very least demand 100% proof before we take a life. Personally, I prefer to err on the side of caution. I do not support the state-sponsored death penalty for any reason.
...and for the ultra-right wingers who will most certainly respond with their tired refrain of "What if it's one of your loved ones?" I reply, as always, should I be able to prove with 100% certainly that you murdered a loved one of mine, I won't need state-sponsored justice to remedy my grief. Take that any way you wish to interpret it.

DennisHermanson

August 19, 2009 - 3:12 pm EDT

I fully agree with Mr. Clark's succinct editorial on the issue of racial justice and the death penalty in North Carolina. In fact, I offered an immediate reaction, a pro-active one. I sent an email to Gov. Bev Perdue, in her eTownhall Suggestion Box, with Mr. Clark's editorial and my thoughts to Gov. Perdue... To the effect that...
"I agree with Mr. Clark on his well-reasoned approach to this issue in North Carolina. The vast expense in this attempt to gain some modest, though important racial justice for those facing the death penalty, can be best served by communting all the sentences to life without parole. Nobody is proud of the death penalty."

I appreciate Mr. Doug Clark's thoughts on this subject.

http://www.governor.state.nc.us/eTownhall/suggestionBox.aspx

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: LIGHT RAIN
  • Current Temperature: 50°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 54° L: 46°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search