news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Mangled priorities indefensible

Tuesday, August 11, 2009
(Updated 3:05 am)

State budget writers began their work this year in a $4.5 billion hole.

That's how far state revenues were projected to be short of expenses.

So it's tempting to cut them some slack for the light years-from-perfect spending plan approved last week and signed into law by Gov. Bev Perdue.

Then you look more closely at some of the sordid details and any sympathy swan dives right out of the window.

One such detail is the elimination of a college scholarship program called EARN (Education Access Reward North Carolina).

As Mark Binker reported in Monday's News & Record, the program was designed to enable low-income students to graduate from college debt-free. Students whose families earn up to twice the federal poverty level were eligible under its guidelines for up to $4,000 per year.

They will receive their final checks this fall semester. Then they're on their own.

The scholarships' elimination will save the state $16.2 million, but it will create a hardship for the neediest college students in the midst of a brutal economy. Locally, the cuts will affect more than 1,200 students, 731 at N.C. A&T and 524 at UNCG.

Some lawmakers say they simply did what they had to do. Money is tight, they say. In times like these you have to make tough choices. Yeah, right.

Like the tough choice they made to end EARN scholarships, which benefit North Carolina residents, while preserving a wasteful initiative that allows out-of-state students to pay in-state tuition on UNC campuses.

Since it primarily affects athletes, the initiative, in the end, winds up subsidizing athletics boosters such as the Rams Club at UNC-Chapel Hill and the Wolfpack Club at N.C. State -- at a cost of $10 million a year to taxpayers.

According to the most recent figures available, the Rams Club reported $47 million in assets, the Wolfpack Club, $77 million. (The definition of needy in this case must involve who needs a winning team the most.)

We dare any state lawmaker to even attempt to defend this pathetic excuse for priorities.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

igliigli

August 11, 2009 - 6:48 am EDT

Don't forget the 1.3 million yearly taxpayer paid Dean Dome subsidy or the half million in UNC-CH student health fees used to pay Athletic Department trainers.
College sports, the biggest taxpayer and student rip-off around.

Norm*

August 11, 2009 - 4:54 pm EDT

Igii, I appreciate your consistency. This whole industry from cradle to grave supporting sports for the sake of some male-oriented soap opera (a bit in each league, some of each team, just enough tension to make the fans come back for more, just name the sport and the weekly angst) is a terrible public expense and waste of resources. Since it is supposedly a wholly self-supporting activity, why aren't sports fully out-sourced to for-profits?

rmacz

August 11, 2009 - 5:47 pm EDT

Also, lets not forget all the state's retirement program. The schools just pull the heart strings more.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search