news-record.com

NEWS

ICE pact forbids Taser use in jail

Sunday, August 9, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

GREENSBORO — A Homeland Security ban against using Tasers on immigration detainees could get in the way of a 287(g) compact between federal authorities and the Guilford County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff BJ Barnes said last week.

Barnes, who was set to sign an agreement granting specific deputies in his department access to Immigration and Customs Enforcement databases, said the Homeland Security policy runs counter to security rules in place at the Greensboro and High Point jails.

“What it comes down to is, they don’t want you to use a Taser,” Barnes said. “That may be a deal-breaker. I’m not going to say one way or another.”

ICE spokesman Richard Rocha said the agency’s use of force policy does not allow for an EMDD — electro-muscular disruption device — to be used on immigration detainees.

“They could have EMDDs at the jail,” Rocha said, “but we would not allow the use of those on our detainees.”

Barnes said it would be hard to draw that line in a jail. If detention officers had to respond to a fight in a crowded day room, for example, Barnes said there would be no time to check the nationalities of those involved before deciding on what action to take.

According to the most recent inmate breakdowns by the sheriff’s office, there were 64 inmates who were non-U.S. citizens awaiting trial in the Greensboro and High Point jails. Of those 64, 48 were here illegally.

Stun guns and Tasers are neither a new nor uncommon tool for quelling disturbances in jails nationwide, though their use continues to generate controversy both in the U.S. and on the part of the U.N. Convention Against Torture.

Tasers, first introduced 25 years ago, temporarily immobilize a person with a 50,000-volt shock. The weapons are alternately described as “non-lethal” or “less-lethal” because suspects and inmates have been known to die immediately after being shocked, although a definite link has not been proven.

When inmates are shot with a Taser, Guilford jail rules dictate that they be examined immediately by medical staff.

Col. Randy Powers, chief deputy for the sheriff’s office, said neither the jails nor field division have ever had a fatality associated with Taser use.

In breaking up melees or subduing violent suspects, Powers said Tasers are preferable to pepper spray because Tasers can be aimed at one person; pepper spray can accidentally hit several people.

Barnes said the mere appearance of a Taser is a deterrent.

“There’s something enlightening about that little red dot on your chest,” Barnes said. “But for us, it’s a use of force. It generates a report, and a file is generated. You’d be surprised at how little we actually use it.”

Between January and June of 2009, 11 of 114 reported uses of force by detention officers at the Greensboro and High Point jails involved the use of Tasers, according to Maj. Debbie Montgomery, who oversees the jails division .

The issue of Tasers at the Alamance County Detention Center came up in a 2008 ICE inspection that resulted in an overall “deficient” rating, according to documents obtained in July by the public interest group Fairness Alamance, via a Freedom of Information request.

Unlike the Alamance jail, which serves as a regional hub for federal detainees, Barnes’ office would play a lesser role in 287(g). Barnes’ plan is for two sheriff’s deputies, both fluent in Spanish, to have cross-sworn authority and access to ICE records.

The goal?

Currently, when a person from another country who has no ID is arrested and charged with a crime, it can take days or weeks to find out who they are and what other warrants they may have outstanding. Under a 287(g), that lag time drops to minutes, Barnes observed.

As part of a top-to-bottom overhaul of the policy for detaining immigrants, President Barack Obama’s secretary for Homeland Security, the Cabinet position responsible for ICE, issued a memo last month for new 287(g) partners to sign. One purpose was uniform treatment of prisoners from one jurisdiction to the next.

Although sheriffs support a consistent approach, Barnes said, there are details to be negotiated, chiefly the Taser issue.

In Alamance County, sheriff’s office spokesman Randy Jones said the detention center used Tasers before the 287(g) program and continues to use them. Jones said the 287(g) agreements under which Alamance County was operating made no mention of Tasers being prohibited, and he could not account for the 2008 inspection by ICE.

“They considered it a 'deficiency’ if you have Tasers. Just the possession of them,” Jones said. “But we’re not changing our use of Tasers.”

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano’s thrust in the memo, which law enforcement agencies have until October to sign, is that 287(g) target dangerous criminals: drug dealers, murderers, kidnappers.

Napolitano’s July announcement also sought to “address concerns that individuals may be arrested for minor offenses as a guise to initiate removal proceedings,” a key criticism Alamance Sheriff Terry Johnson has encountered.

Hannah Gill, a Graham resident who founded Fairness Alamance, said the new 287(g) approach is a response to similar situations across the country.

“Obviously, the lack of immigration reform has created a lot of challenges and problems for communities,” said Gill, an anthropologist. “We’re now going through a period where there’s really extreme anti-immigrant sentiment.”

In Gill’s view, the memorandum seeks to underscore serious, violent offenders. It meanwhile discourages 287(g) partners from wasting resources on minor traffic offenders, a focus she said built a climate of fear of police on the part of the Latino community.

Last week, the top news items on ICE’s Web site were that agents had deported “the second man this week wanted for murder in Mexico,” along with 53 gang arrests in Florida, assorted child pornographers, and a tractor-trailer in Nogales, Ariz., smuggling 97 immigrants “including children.”

It is in contrast to the major criticism of 287(g) programs around the country, one of which reached a boiling point in July 2008 in Alamance County. That was when a young library clerk was arrested at her job after it was discovered that she sought pre-natal care at the county Health Department. Marxavi Angel Martinez , then 23, had been brought here illegally at age 3 from Mexico .

Barnes says he has no such vision for Guilford’s 287(g) program. Initially, the plan would be for one cross-sworn field deputy from Special Operations to come to the jail and interview inmates suspected of being in the U.S. illegally.

Once these were established as ICE cases, Powers said, the inmates likely would be transferred to Alamance, which is the regional facility, and does not have Guilford’s overcrowding.

As to the concerns about possible racial profiling of Latinos raised in recent community forums on the 287(g) issue, Barnes describes the program he envisions as “self-initiated” by people who commit crimes.

“If I have no reason to be dealing with you, if you have not broken the law in some way, then you’re not going to have any problems out of this,” Barnes said.

“If (racial profiling) has been done in other counties, that’s just sorry, and woe be unto them. We’re not going to do that here. We’re not looking for folks we can put into the system or break up families.”

As part of the U.S. government’s unfolding effort to remake the deportation process into what a newly appointed ICE official called “a truly civil detention system,” the agency will stop imprisoning families at the T. Don Hutto Residential Center in Austin, Texas.

The notorious for-profit facility, the subject of prayer vigils, ACLU lawsuits, and searing footage of children behind razor wire and families imprisoned in cells with open toilets, will be converted into an immigration prison for women, the New York Times reported Thursday in an interview with John Morton, the new chief of ICE.

 

Contact Lorraine Ahearn at 373-7334 or lorraine.ahearn@news-record.com

 

 

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Sheriff BJ Barnes

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

laserguidedloogie

August 9, 2009 - 3:55 am EDT

Pardon me but that is insane. The fedgov doesn't mind if police taser Americans all day long, but don't taze the immigrants bro! Who made that policy up? The American government needs to stop worrying so much about other country's citizens and start paying attention to the people that actually pay their salary.

horselady09

August 9, 2009 - 7:47 am EDT

Amen to that. These immigrants have more rights than the US Citizen! Look around they're everywhere!
The government first brought them here to help out the farmers,$500.00 per head to get them here to work the fields.
Jobs that the white and black people got "to good to do" because the wages were so cheap.When time to go home in the fall, they would bail out and take off,not return on the bus to take them home.They soon found construction jobs,next thing you know they got their whole families here,(if they hadn't hooked up with some white gal)here.
This country had a drug problem before they (immigrants)started coming across the border,but look what they bring with them,more drugs,gangs etc. I say forget the taser,put a bullet in that gun and be done with it!

Highlander

August 9, 2009 - 10:02 am EDT

Horselady, I call myself a Liberal and I think that Tasers are an effective means of controlling uncooperative individuals both in jail and out. It beats the billy club. I also think we have a problem with Illegal immigration that must be controlled. Legal immigration is a good thing. I don't hate the people that are trying to find a better life in our country. Your ancestors were immigrants, most likely. I think you have stepped over the line when you say "put a bullet in that gun and be done with it." If you are joking, it's crass and irresponsible. If you're proud of yourself for saying it, then you can just call yourself a good Republican.

kikablue

August 9, 2009 - 6:51 pm EDT

Thank You, Highlander, I agree with you. I wonder if horse@@s09 realizes what goes around comes around? I am so sick of the racist that spew their racist comments. I know some of the illegals are causing problems, but there is no reason to blantly call for cold blooded murder.

herodance

August 9, 2009 - 10:31 am EDT

The problem with Barnes saying the program is "self-initiated" is that police have a lot of power to stop people and not everybody who is stopped by the police has committed any crime. Most officers are decent people just doing their job but a few are racist and treat people differently based on skin color.
Also, like anybody else officers can make mistakes. They are acting based on the information they have at the time of the arrest, but sometimes it turns out a mistake was made. That's what courts are for. That's what "innocent until proven guilty" is for. That's my biggest gripe about 287g and all the sheriffs who say it's only for people who commit crimes. Not everybody charged with a crime is guilty of one.

Don Stowe

August 9, 2009 - 12:45 pm EDT

How did we arrive at the place where so many people confuse the illegal immigrant problem with the crime problem. Some people think that the illegals should have a free ride when in fact a huge part of the crime is perputrated by persons who have no right to be here. Deportation is a quicker and more economical way to rid our society of those law-breakers. Simply being in this country withour following the legal way is a crime. Regardless of how much sympathy you have for them, it is a crime. If we can scan computer records of arrestees to determine legal status and deport those who are not legal, isn't that a better way than keeping them in prison in this country?

Also, it seems that in many peoples minds Law Enforcement officers are the enemy and that we should be on the side of the criminal. We shed crocodile tears over the criminal element, demand that they have the best lawyers available, three or four freebies before going to prison, have the best living conditions if they should go to prison, and condemn those who try to protect society from these offenders. We second guess the Law Enforcement system and the courts. We try to restrict the use of proven tolls available to police officers. We abhor the use of Tazers and or stun guns. We are horrified if an officer uses a billy club. Much screaming and condemnation is heard if an officer is forced to shoot someone. Our respect for the criminal is greater than the respect for those fine individuals who risk life and limb to protect us?

It would be much better to realize that if a person is acting in a manner that threatens someone else, particularly a law enforcement officer, that person should expect to receive unpleasant results of whatever level is required. Remember that our laws require that an offender is to submit peacefully to arrest and let the courts sort it out later.

Wake up, America.

Panacea

August 9, 2009 - 1:37 pm EDT

What's that got to do with quelling disorder in a jail?

I agree with Sheriff Barnes on this one. ICE should not be telling him how to run his jail.

Wiley

August 9, 2009 - 2:34 pm EDT

Does this mean they're going back to hitting inmates in the face with knight sticks?

jsipe29

August 9, 2009 - 2:48 pm EDT

Laser, you are exactly right. When you come or go into another country, you better know how things are handle there. If we go into a country that cuts your fingers off when you steal something, then ignorance of the law is no defense there. When I travel abroad, I always find out thier laws first. Like in the Bahamas, they make it quit clear that taking coral from the ocean could get you a very long sentence there. Driving drunk will cost you $50 and a stay in jail till you sober up. I don't have to agree with thier laws, I just have to make sure I don't break them.

gsostudent

August 10, 2009 - 10:24 pm EDT

Anything that keeps 287(g) from coming to Guilford County. It's a mess everywhere else and it would be here!

Horselady09- You don't know the first thing about what it means to have compassion for the lives of others, and your racist spewing is not only offensive, but mostly just makes you appear inarticulate and ignorant. You clearly know nothing about why people immigrate and are either pretending that your ancestors didn't immigrate here too unless you're indigenous or your ancestors were brought here in shackles- regardless of the circumstances it's nearly impossible to understand how you can locate yourself so far away from the realities of people who are just struggling to put food on the table for their children.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search