news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Keep auto safety inspections

Friday, July 31, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

The state’s decades-old vehicle safety inspection program may be flawed, but it’s still worth keeping.

Whether to scrap it is being bandied about in the waning days of this General Assembly session. The bill’s backers argue that nothing links those inspections with highway safety. Doing away with them, they say, would save state drivers millions of dollars and much inconvenience.

The push to do away with annual checks apparently has roots in last year’s legislative study that questioned the effectiveness and need for both safety inspections and vehicle emissions testing.

However, there’s substantial sentiment to keep them. The State Highway Patrol, the DMV and AAA Carolinas all say they’re worthwhile. Not surprisingly, tire dealers and auto repair shop owners also are on board.

The timing for such a radical change seems odd, considering the state in 2008 launched a program pairing inspections with vehicle registration.

Starting Monday, drivers can’t get a new or renewed registration if the DMV database shows the car hasn’t been inspected in the last 12 months — no inspection, no registration.

Nor do the bill’s backers say how the state, already strapped for cash, will replace the substantial revenue inspections bring in. Likewise, hundreds of service stations statewide that rely heavily on inspections revenue would take a financial hit in a sour economy.  

At the same time, the legislative study made points worth noting. It suggested, for example, exempting from emissions testing, which is conducted in 48 urban counties, vehicles three years old and newer since the failure rate is miniscule. And it criticized DMV for poorly administering or policing the safety inspections program.

While a connection between inspections and highway safety may be tenuous, requiring that obvious flaws like bald tires, faulty brakes and broken lights be replaced or fixed is justified.

It’s reasonable to conclude that without such oversight, our highways would be even more dangerous. Rather than axing the inspections effort, it should be strengthened.            
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Doug Johnson

July 31, 2009 - 5:37 am EDT

Bull feathers, this is so outdated it is rank.
if you want safety on the highway, write a article on why we give illegals driving permits, when they can not read the road signs,
Are maybe why they are allowed to drive with no car insurance.

Interested

July 31, 2009 - 7:29 am EDT

What? The state doesn't LET anyone drive without insurance - people just do it, much like folks who have multiple DUIs, lose their license, and continue to drive just the same. And to say that we shouldn't continue with inspections because illegals are the problem is silly - our roads had dangers twenty years ago as well, long before the great influx. If we want to make our roads safer, we should address whichever safety issues will have a meaningful impact.

read_and_learn

August 2, 2009 - 12:11 am EDT

every auto repair guy i ever talked to hates the yearly inspection law. he has to pay like 12 thousand for the machine ( or some hi dollar amount) and then he only makes 10 bucks per inspection which takes significant time , the driver must take time off from his job every year .

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search