news-record.com

LIFE

Custody fight for 5-leg dog ensues

Thursday, July 23, 2009
(Updated 8:54 am)

Lilly, the five-legged puppy, may still end up in a New York freak show if John Strong gets his way.

Strong, who owns a Coney Island exhibit featuring unusual animals, says he'll file a lawsuit today in Charlotte to stake his claim for Lilly. He's retained a local lawyer, he says, but wouldn't name the attorney.

Strong contends he's the rightful owner of Lilly because the pup's original owner, Calvin Owensby of Gastonia, broke an implied contract to sell him the dog.

The two had agreed on a price and Strong paid a $1,000 deposit. But Owensby decided to sell the pup to a Charlotte woman after media reports of the freak-show deal sparked an outcry from animal lovers.

"It's like a guy who sells you a car and then later tells you he's going to sell it to someone else," Strong told the Observer Wednesday. "I was the original owner -- it doesn't matter if it's a five-legged dog, a house or a car."

Strong heard about the puppy a few weeks ago and phoned Owensby to ask his price. He explained that his show contained "amazing animals, oddities and freaks," he said.

Owensby, an out-of-work electrician from Gastonia, said he'd sell for $3,000.

When Charlotte's Allyson Siegel read about the plan to exhibit the puppy, she offered $3,000 -- plus $1,000 to refund Strong's deposit. Owensby agreed.

Lilly's extra leg makes it hard for the seven-week-old puppy to walk, so Siegel plans to have it removed next week. But Strong says he'll seek an injunction to stop any surgery on the Chihuahua-terrier mix.

Siegel vows to fight: "I just want to throw up," she said. "I want to say 'over my dead body.'"

Owensby questions the merit of Strong's threatened lawsuit: "We didn't have no contract. We didn't sign any papers or anything. I don't see why he'd do that; I refunded his money."

Strong acknowledges he got his money back, and last week said he was disappointed but could live with the outcome. He told the Observer: "Sometimes, you just gotta say: 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals,' and move on."

But now, after Lilly's story spread nationally and drew online comments calling him cruel and exploitative, Strong says he's changed his mind.

He wants people to know his animals are treated well and that customers enjoy seeing their unusual traits.

"We're good people," he says, "and we take care of our animals."

 

Accompanying Photos

Jeff Siner (Associated Press)

Photo Caption: Lily, a Chihuahua terrier mix that has five legs, licks a bowl.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Happy

July 23, 2009 - 7:38 am EDT

The puppy should go to Allyson Siegel. She is kind and has the best intent for the puppy. The man from NY is cruel and exploitive and has no legal right to this pup. I hope the courts do not grant that man ownership of the puppy.

in the schools

July 23, 2009 - 10:29 am EDT

I would argue that most dog owners are exploitive. I'll openly admit that I take my Great Dane with me to petsmart because I like the attention he brings me. It's fun to have people want to pet your dog or get to know more about the breed. I agree the motivation is different for this Coney Island quack, but I can't help but feel a little hypoctrical coming down on him for it.

Illiterati

July 23, 2009 - 9:36 am EDT

The dog's seller is pretty savvy, too, if my math is correct. According to the Charlotte paper, he got $1k from the Coney Island jerk, which he returned after getting $4k from the nice Charlotte lady. Nice lady agrees to the $4k, thinking the extra grand is actually to cover his refund, when it's really just an extra grand.

($1k+$4k=$5k; $5k-$1k=$4k)

But however much money he got for the pup, the nice lady should take the dog home and have its extra leg removed. And the Coney Island guy should go home. He's only making himself look worse than he already is. Lets hope the judge has the sense enough to toss this out of court.

ginnydaley

July 23, 2009 - 10:03 am EDT

Great quote: "Sometimes, you just gotta say: 'OK, I still have nine live, two-headed animals,' and move on."

Kudos to Allyson Siegel for stepping in and creating a win-win situation for the pup and the out of work 'dad.' She's a real hero in my book.

CherylP25

July 23, 2009 - 10:57 am EDT

Please check out the ADOPT A PET ads that will be in the News & Record Friday, featuring pets who need homes. They may not have 5 legs, but there's sure to be something for everyone!
It's a shame so much $$ is being spent trying to get this one dog, when there are so many out there who badly need loving homes.

kikablue

July 23, 2009 - 11:32 am EDT

I hope the Judge rules in favor of what is best for the puppy. Having the extra leg removed and living in a loving home to be loved and cared for. Being a loving pet and companion. Rather than being MISTREATED, yes I said mistreated, living in a cage having an extra leg that makes it hard for it to get around. Not loved just used for the all mighty dollar. If this guy will use animals this way for people to gawk at and laugh at make fun of. Just think how he must treat DISABLED PEOPLE? I just hope the Judge has a Loving Heart for animals, and not just for the $

Cemetery

July 23, 2009 - 11:34 am EDT

I think Ms. Siegel should go ahead & have the leg removed before any injunction can be filed & have it done with. The quality of life of this dog is what is important here. The Coney Island jerk wouldn't have it removed & it would make life difficult for little Lilly. Do what's best for the dog, people!

Lisa03

July 23, 2009 - 2:31 pm EDT

I agree with you. Once that 5th leg is removed, that guy won't want that puppy anymore. Surely there isn't a judge out there that will let this guy get this puppy.

adoptashelterpet

July 23, 2009 - 1:08 pm EDT

Where is the SPCA on Coney Island? The line that struck me is "out of work electrician" this was a bidding war for a poor disabled puppy. Thank goodness the person with the puppies best interest won the bidding war,lets hope the judge sees it that way.

ESLLEL

July 23, 2009 - 1:10 pm EDT

It sounds like to me that Mr Strong is the FREAK. He is also just trying to make money off the dog and that is all for the wrong reason. He is not truely an animal lover like most so therefore he does not deserve Lilly. I hope and pray Ms Siegel gets her so Lilly can be a healthier puuy/dog and live a happy loving life. She is so preicous.

fisher

July 23, 2009 - 2:36 pm EDT

"We didn't have no contract."

By canceling out the double negative, this translates to "We did have a contract."

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Local Tickets

View All

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search