news-record.com

NEWS

Developer leaves behind questions, half-built houses

Thursday, July 23, 2009
(Updated 5:13 pm)

GREENSBORO — After a recession and a potentially life-threatening building error in some of its town houses, Portrait Homes is all but gone from the area.

The Chicago-based developer came to the Triad in the past decade and built hundreds of residences in neighborhoods stretching between Whitsett and Winston-Salem.

But they’re leaving half-built buildings and plenty of unanswered questions.

In fall 2007, the company discovered it had installed substandard fire walls between at least 100 town houses in communities here. After several months of negotiations with homeowners, inspectors and independent engineers, the company reinstalled fire walls of the proper thickness.

“As far as we know, all fire wall problems have been addressed,” said Portrait spokesman Jonathan Dedmon, offering few other details on the company’s exit.

Calls to Portrait’s listed office here have not been returned.

A lawsuit against Portrait by the company initially contracted to install the fire walls was settled out of court this year, but numerous liens from other contractors are filed in the Guilford County Courthouse against Portrait.

Neither residents nor local building inspectors know who is in charge of construction in many of the incomplete communities.

In places such as Ridge Creek in Whitsett, half-completed units have stood with their windows boarded since last fall.

“In the majority of our communities in the Triad area, we have negotiated settlements with the banks in which the properties have been returned to them,” Dedmon said. “We are still in negotiations with our lenders over several properties.”

Banks foreclosed on some unfinished developments.

“It’ll be picked up by the bank and if (the units) are not completed then they’d be torn down,” said David Jones, chief building inspector for Greensboro.

As for those fire walls, some residents are having trouble getting documentation.

“I don’t think they’ve gotten the letter saying it has been done,” said John Mattey, president of the homeowners association at Bridford Downs in southwest Greensboro. Fixing the problem fire wall was handled between the owners and the company, not through a homeowners association.

But now that the company’s gone, who will handle lingering construction problems?

“The contractors are not going to respond, of course,” Mattey said. A resident there had an issue with weatherproofing around a window — it leaked during rain, causing mold problems in the house, he said.

The problem was solved, Mattey said, with a combination of insurance from the homeowner and the neighborhood association’s insurance.

“(We’re) using the master policy and homeowners policy, even though it is a Portrait issue,” Mattey said.

The only development the company’s Web site recognizes with having homes for sale is Ridge Creek in Whitsett, even though the words “A Portrait Homes Community” can be seen in other places such as the Tuscany development in northwest Greensboro.

“Nobody’s called me back in a long time here,” Jones said, adding that he feels as though Portrait handled the fire wall repairs.

 

Contact Gerald Witt at 373-7008 or gerald.witt@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

H. Scott Hoffmann (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Portrait Homes' unfinished town homes in Whitsett in July. 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

wny1951

July 23, 2009 - 8:39 am EDT

I am a resident of a Portriat Homes community in Bridford Downs. I have had my house redone in the correct firewall, I know of several residents who have not had this done.. I have e-mailed the parent company in Chicago several months ago asking for a letter saying the work was completed but have not heard back from them. The unfinished community next to ours has had reports of homeless living there even though they are boarded up. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated

Gerald Witt

July 23, 2009 - 9:17 am EDT

wny -

Please e-mail me at - anyone else who is experiencing a similar issue can contact me as well.

CherylP25

July 23, 2009 - 10:42 am EDT

What shameful waste - half building houses then tearing them down. Crazy.

kikablue

July 23, 2009 - 11:09 am EDT

Why can't Habit for Humanity finish these for low income people to buy, instead of tearing them down? People need homes, this is just a waste of time and money tearing them down. Leave it to North Carolina. People complain about the homeless staying in them. Why not have the cities that say they are HELPING END HOMELESSNESS, hire the homeless to help finish the homes pay them minimum wage there are a lot of the homeless that know how to do this type of work but because they are homeless can not get a job. Use a little of the common sense God gave you solve three major problems at once? Or is it better to have an eyesore, and something to complain about. There is no sense in tearing them down. Put your heads together, work together. If you don't work to solve the problem then YOU are part of the problem. After all JESUS was homeless, and a carpenter. Did you forget that?

buzzman

July 23, 2009 - 12:26 pm EDT

kikablue makes a lot of sense! It would certainly be more cost-effective to take these partially-built homes and complete them using those fellows who stand at intersections with signs that read "work wanted."
Yes, it's all about COMMON SENSE which seem to be in very short supply with local government.

Kesh

July 23, 2009 - 12:28 pm EDT

Great suggestion about Habitat but I think it would all depend on the nieghborhood and the size of the home. Many( not all) Habitat owners are barely up keeping the neighborhoods they have.... You might be better off tearing them down.

BillyBob1986

July 23, 2009 - 5:50 pm EDT

Kika,
It all comes down to money. The Banks will foreclose on these properties if an agreement isnt struck with Portrait. It would then be up to the Banks to either sell the properties to other developers/investors (good luck) or build them out themselves to re-coup what may have been lost in the original development and/or construction loan.
I would consider it very unlikely that Banks would consider donating the properties. Banks are businesses and exist to make a profit -just like all other businesses. Banks are not social service entities.
A foreclosure represents a loss that the Bank has to absorb. Selling or re-developing the properties is the only way to recoup the loss. A tax write-off based on a donation is probably not what most Banks would consider.

tell it

July 24, 2009 - 6:59 am EDT

What a incredibly stupid idea,are you saying a majority of the homeless are framers,HVAC,roofers,carpenters,plumbers,electricians,etc..?Who is going to pay them? Where will they live and shower while building the house?I am going to say the majority of those living in those houses don't want to work,have never worked,and have no desire to start working.Geeez you feel gooders are just as dumb as rocks.Would you want to live in a hose a bum built?

Rolling

July 24, 2009 - 7:22 am EDT

Tell it,

You don't know what your talking about. My sister lives in a Habitat Home, pays the mortgage every month and is a nurse at the VA in Asheville. She has been employed for the last 15 years and has made all the payments. People aren't always homeless because they want to be. Your the one that is dumb as a rock and a bigot to boot.

jmoffat

July 24, 2009 - 8:35 am EDT

As well-intentioned as your idea is, these home cannot be rehabbed without MAJOR investment. They have been sitting half-built, crumbling and exposed to the elements for nearly a year. As a resident within one of these Portrait communities, I would have no problem with someone, some organization coming in to rehab buildings since anything would be better than non-completed construction. However, it's not financially feasible.

tdr123

July 24, 2009 - 12:06 pm EDT

To Tell It,
You should not call "do gooders" dumb as rocks when you present yourself as the biggest dumb rock of all. The habitat idea was simply an option. If you knew anything about Habitat for Humanity, you would know they don't take homeless people off the street, give them tools and tell them to get to work. Duh! Professionals, working with volunteers and the people who will be living in the house all work together to build the houses. Maybe you should try volunteering. It may give you a less negative outlook on life.

JustACountryBoy

July 24, 2009 - 11:52 am EDT

I'm just a country boy, but here's my 2 cents...

These buildings have to be torn down...no if's, ands or buts!!! These unfinished buildings have been taking weather for too long. The partical board, which is beneath the siding has been exposed to the elements for over a year. The boarding on all these buildings has started to come apart. In some instances, water has eroded under the buildings causing major foundation problems. This is not to mention the theft or property damage, which these units and buildings have experienced.

Portrait Homes left folks, who purchased from them, in a world of "Deep #&*$!" The banks have got to figure it out while the affected H.O.A.'s hopefully will have sense enough to come together as a group along with their management groups to collectively find a way to go after that now-defunct (in the Triad) company and its parent company in Chicago.

Just My 2 Cents...

JustACountryBoy

chenok

July 23, 2009 - 11:31 am EDT

I live in the community Bordeaux - Retreat at Jamestown. Luckily we only have two buildings that were started and unfinished (however, they are starting to look pretty bad at this point). We also have four buildings still to be built.

You could tell about six months before they stopped all work that Portrait had already started pulling out. The quality of work that was done started to show decreased interest. And, those homeowners that just recently reached their one year point can not get any of the warranty work done that should have been done by the builder.

I still love the community, great neighbors and still a good looking community over all. It will be nice once the remaining buildings are complete.

Thanks for the story - however - it would have been nice if Portrait had been put on the spot much earlier. Too much time passed with nothing being done.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search