news-record.com

NEWS

Financing a hotel is a tough job

Thursday, July 2, 2009
(Updated 3:27 pm)

GREENSBORO — A Memphis businesswoman with strong ties to Greensboro believes she has found a way to build a $75 million hotel project despite a deep recession and dried-up credit markets.

The proposal is going into high gear now, said Bridget Chisholm, because billions in redevelopment bonds were just released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in June as part of the massive American Reinvestment and Recovery Act.

Nearly $40 million has been allocated for possible projects in Greensboro and Guilford County, a release from the Treasury shows.

Chisholm, a financial consultant with experience managing a $12 million public-private development in Memphis, is seizing the chance to work with Greensboro to raise the subsidized bond money for a project that she believes could be a strong stimulus to business and the city.

But as the Towne Center at Soulsville community development project showed, she’ll need a team of professionals working with the government and private lenders to put together complex layers of financing needed for a 300-bed full-service hotel.

“It’s not for the squeamish,” said Chisholm, a Fayetteville native and a 1986 graduate of Wake Forest University with an MBA from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.

“What’s happened with this global crisis and meltdown — the traditional way that people go about putting together deals doesn’t really work,” she said. “The whole goal of this Recovery and Reinvestment Act is to stimulate business.”

But some, including developer Milton Kern, are dubious that financing can be found for any hotel.

“Banks are just not loaning money for hotels,” he said.

Besides the hotel proposal, the Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro and city officials plan a trip to Washington next week to ask for legislators’ support for Greensboro’s efforts to build a central office for Guilford County Schools in the South Elm Street district.

Chisholm said Greensboro is a perfect place to christen her Urban Hotel Group venture because:

-- The South Elm Street redevelopment site, which the city has bought and cleaned up to attract major business projects, is nearly ready to be sold this year.

-- Greensboro is a good market for another full-service hotel.

-- Chisholm does work for the N.C. Institute for Minority Business, is a financial adviser for Bennett College and has a residence here.

-- Her brother and friends live here in Greensboro.

Greensboro’s hotel business is down 20 percent right now, said Henri Fourrier, the president of the Greensboro Convention and Visitors Bureau.

But that doesn’t mean we have enough rooms in all tiers of the market. “There’s a market for full-service hotels with meeting space,” he said.

Greensboro is attracting more and more conventions, youth sports events and religious group meetings, Fourrier said, and another full-service hotel near the Greensboro Coliseum would draw business.

A new hotel might mean some hotels would go out of business, he said.

“I don’t think this market can sustain any more hotel rooms,” he said. “But if someone is going to invest, I believe a full-service hotel most closely aligns itself with what our market can support.”

Andy Scott, Greensboro’s assistant city manager and economic developer, said he had been hearing from hotel companies interested in building here in the past few months.

 “I’ve talked to more hotel developers than I’ve talked to any other single source, and we’re not talking fly-by-night,” Scott said. “The hotel industry must see some (kind) of unmet demand here in Greensboro.”

But Ed Wolverton, president and CEO of Downtown Greensboro, isn’t sure about the prospects for these deals.

“There has been interest from hotel developers in downtown for a couple of years,” he said. “Entrepreneurs feel there is definitely a market. In today’s environment, however, finding financing has become much more difficult for these projects. I have been dealing with two serious prospects in the past 18 months. Neither is the South Elm project. They are new to the scene.”

Chisholm, a former county commissioner in Memphis, used a combination of government tax credits and assistance from Wachovia to raise the money for the Soulsville project, and construction is under way. It includes offices, retail and restaurants.

“She’s an incredibly bright woman,” Scott said. “She’s got a track record, she’s done this before. Everything she’s talking about has kind of tested itself out.”

He said the city’s redevelopment commission and the City Council would have final approval of any project, however, and it must be capable of paying off any city debt before it gets approved.

If assembling such a complex and expensive deal is a long shot, however, Chisholm won’t be the one to say so.
“I don’t spend my own money and time on stuff that isn’t real,” she said. “And the level of people that are involved don’t spend their time on something that isn’t real.”

Staff writer Donald W. Patterson contributed to this report.

Contact Richard M. Barron at 373-7371 or richard.barron@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: An artist’s rendering from mid-2009 shows the proposed hotel project.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Norm*

July 2, 2009 - 7:36 am EDT

The main focus seems to be taking advantage of federal dollars not on long term profitability or sustainability of the project. The developer takes their 10% to 20% up front and leaves the locals holding the bag. This is an example of what has gotten us into this economic situation not a solution. Run this thief out of town, then lets take the time to get rid of the locals who think they can support this kind of crap focused only on their gain. We've got better things to invest in in Greensboro and Guilford county than this.

newkid

July 3, 2009 - 1:21 pm EDT

Amen! Have we learned NOTHING from the current economic mess? It's these "all puff, no substance, taxpayer-holding-the-bag" projects that developers dream up (then they leave town, go bankrupt, or get a bailout).

Paul J

July 2, 2009 - 9:07 am EDT

Any of these quick fix projects to create jobs is only going to help the rich. When these buildings and roads are done what do the workers do then? We need long term career jobs not band-aids. I agree run these thieves out of town. Always remember the so called financial consultants and managers were trained by the same people that caused the down fall of this country. More of the same old same old does not work.
History has proven that we do not learn by mistakes of the past. It is time to start.

rob_ward

July 2, 2009 - 9:13 am EDT

You could go build a $75 million dollar hotel in Whitsett...... who is going to stay there ? All I see is an empty hotel in downtown Greensboro.

Port City Traveler

July 2, 2009 - 10:33 am EDT

Although I wish Greensboro would be satisfied being a small-sized city, this idea may work. Most of the professional organizations at the local universities and colleges cannot hold large-sized regional meetings in Downtown Greensboro with 1000's of participants because the Gate City lacks siginificant downtown hotel space. Other events like A&T's Homecoming and the Furniture Market could also benefit. With the new City Swimming Facility and the Belk Track & Field, this hotel could help to attract more tourism dollars to Downtown/S. Elm St. district year-round.

nclawkid

July 2, 2009 - 11:14 am EDT

You all are bunch of negative nancys that complain about anything.

Norm*

July 2, 2009 - 6:42 pm EDT

Not so much negative as honest. The purpose of the government is not to create opportunities or loopholes so businesses may make a profit. Businesses are supposed to produce something of value as justified by the market conditions and demand. In this instance, the subsidy would allow the structure to be "developed" then the long term operating expenses would fall upon the owners of the structure. If the project is truly justified by market demand then let private investors put forth the money. Public money should be invested in infrastructure and public services, not subsidies for private ventures to profit. In this case, the developer doesn't even live here. She can look up other small cities to find who's on the list for possible funding, search the local newspapers elsewhere to pick up deals that others dropped because they were not viable. Save the hyperbole for someplace else, maybe Fayetteville, or Charlston WVA, or Lancaster, PA, just to suggest a few. Negative, no just sick of liars scamming folks with false truths of what their intentions are. Why not give her $50 or $100k now and tell her to get lost, it will be cheaper in the long run. (and those who think hotels are great businesses can go sign up for the jobs they offer. . .)

Norm*

July 3, 2009 - 8:33 am EDT

and while I'm still on a roll . . . throwing in the bit about the GCS central office plan is a feel-good smokescreen. While the thought that a new central office will increase the academic achievement of students is a fun idea, it is unfounded and based on narcissism and ego. Right now, the lack of investment in our local schools is evident in the resources and conditions at the schools. If you want to see the difference between quality and lack thereof, tour A&T, UNC-G, or GTCC to see quality in an educational infrastructure and then take a tour of a few public schools. What you'll see is how our higher ed. institutions get funded by the legislature, and the public schools are squeezed dry by local small-minded politicians intent on "saving money" and not providing educations. If they need a new central office, haul all the mobile units from behind the local schools into the parking lot across the street from the Coliseum and spend any money on the schools themselves.
This self-aggrandizing "developer" is trying to bamboozle our local politicians to get behind this obvious flim-flam based on nothing but perceived political gain, not benefit for the community and certainly not the k-12 students.

piperscot

July 2, 2009 - 1:14 pm EDT

The newspaper needs to ask Ms. Chisholm about her relationship and support for Nikki Taylor. Also, Ms. Chisholm was never elected as a Commissioner, she was appointed to fill out a term, backed by the notorious Ford family in Memphis and local developers. She chose not to run for the office when the election came around. You also need to ask her about being charged with Conflict of Interest.

piperscot

July 2, 2009 - 1:18 pm EDT

correction - Nikki Tinker

thestatelottery

July 2, 2009 - 2:50 pm EDT

Hopefully, they will be forced into designing this hotel to some sort of LEED standard to get any kind of stimulus money.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search