news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Controversial death penalty bill advances

Wednesday, July 1, 2009
(Updated 7:58 am)

RALEIGH (MCT) — A bill aimed at reducing racial disparities in the imposition of the death penalty advanced another step in the N.C. General Assembly yesterday.

Supporters of the bill, which is known as the "North Carolina Racial Justice Act," say that it would combat racial bias by giving defendants and death-row inmates clear legal procedures to argue that race played a significant role in decisions to impose the death penalty.

But the bill is controversial because of the way it would allow defendants and inmates to use statistics to try to show racial bias.

The bill would allow them to use data from other death-penalty trials within the same county, prosecutorial district, judicial division or the state at large. For instance, a black defendant might argue to a judge that, statistically, blacks are much more likely than whites to receive the death penalty in one or more of those jurisdictions. The statistical evidence alone would be enough for a judge to throw out the death penalty for that defendant -- regardless of the particular facts of the defendant's case.

Supporters say that the bill is necessary to overcome a legacy of systemic bias in the criminal-justice system that has been especially pronounced in the realm of capital punishment. Murders involving black defendants, or white victims, or both, are more likely to result in death sentences.

The bill's sponsors also said that defendants would have to meet high standards before a judge would rule that race played a significant role in decisions to impose the death penalty.

''I just want to re-emphasize that the burden of proof in this act is with the defendant," said state Rep. Earline Parmon, D-Forsyth. She and Rep. Larry Womble, also D-Forsyth, are two of the bill's biggest advocates.

''This is a bill for fair sentencing," Parmon added. "And it's been around a long time, and it's time for us to move forward on it."

The legislature is doing just that, but the bill is far from a sure bet to pass into law. Yesterday, the bill was approved by a key judiciary committee in the N.C. House. The committee's vote was 7-6.

It must go through one more committee before coming up in the full House, where Republicans plan to oppose it aggressively, and some conservative Democrats may be unenthusiastic about the bill.

''I think it will be close," said Rep. Paul "Skip" Stam, R-Wake and the House minority leader. "We will fight it hard."

Another test for the bill is in the N.C. Senate. That chamber previously approved a version of it, but the bill has undergone significant changes since then that may make it less palatable to some senators.

The bill's opponents argue that it would, in effect, create racial quotas for the death penalty. The bill's supporters dispute that claim.

Under the bill, a defendant charged with first-degree murder could use the bill's procedures to challenge either a prosecutor's decision to seek the death penalty or a jury's decision to issue a death sentence. It also would give all current death-row inmates one year to challenge the death sentences in their cases on the basis of race.

If a death sentence were thrown out, it would be automatically converted to a sentence of life in prison without parole.

The General Assembly's Fiscal Research Division estimates that the bill could cost the state $2 million to $6 million in new expenses based on the additional appeals that would likely arise in death-penalty cases.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Thomas G Smothers Jr

July 1, 2009 - 7:07 am EDT

Why complicate things, just execute all MURDERERS, not twenty years after the fact twenty minutes after the trial!!!
They say, but what if we make a mistake? I say I'll take my chances they won't!

Beadbaby

July 1, 2009 - 7:35 am EDT

Mr. Smothers, what if it's your son or daughter wrongly convicted of murder? You still feel the same?

garcia

July 1, 2009 - 9:30 am EDT

Actually statistics show that the white male commits more murders than "colored" people. The thing is that when there are other races involved, prosecutors are more likely to ask for the death penalty, which translates into the headline on the 10 o'clock news saying some black male is facing capital chargers and the white community is horrified. How about we get educated and stop perpetuating the fear of the "black man."

ncb

July 1, 2009 - 10:19 am EDT

Wrong. As a percentage of the population, blacks commit far more murders and crime than any other race. Its not even debatable. They represent 6.5% of the population and commit close to 50% of felonies. How about getting educated and stop apologizing for black men.

Lakeshia

July 1, 2009 - 10:02 am EDT

Silly me, I thought the death penalty had been abolished - just look at Blanche Taylor Moore - she has now received, courtesy of the taxpayers, free food, housing, medical care, clothing, etc. for more than 18 years - what a joke -

thestatelottery

July 2, 2009 - 3:17 pm EDT

They should just abolish the death penalty all together! If you don't realize that there is clear racial and class bias in sentencing in the justice system, you have never been to court or read the facts.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 42°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 62° L: 43°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search