news-record.com

SPORTS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Inside Scoop: Money for ACC museum 'wasteful,' Berger says

Monday, June 29, 2009
(Updated 7:54 am)

The News & Observer of Raleigh recently did a series titled “The Generous Assembly,” which ripped lawmakers for not getting a handle on spending. One of the stories focused on money given to “pet projects,” placing the ACC Hall of Fame in the same category as the infamous teapot museum.

This is part of an age-old push and pull here between being good stewards of taxpayer dollars and helping projects important to folks back home succeed. Those projects are, of course, pork barrel spending to those who don’t live there.

Just to be clear: Scoop is all for spending public money wisely. And we don’t much have an opinion one way or another about whether ACC Hall of Champions, due to open in 2011, is wise spending or not.

But it’s unusual to see someone who represents the area where a pork/economic development project is located take aim at it.

Enter Sen. Phil Berger.

The Eden Republican, who represents much of Guilford County, including parts of Greensboro, picked up the Raleigh paper’s theme and targeted the ACC Museum in a news release last week, characterizing it as “wasteful pork spending.”

Berger is a fiscal conservative and his party’s leader in the Senate, so it’s not unusual for him to take a swing at waste.

“We’re just saying that’s money that was appropriated in past years, hasn’t been spent, is sitting there. It’s something that if we truly have the type of crisis where we’re talking about the need, the absolute need to raise taxes in a recession then maybe we need to look and rethink whether it made sense to appropriate those monies in the past,” Berger said.

So, to be clear, would Berger be in favor or reclaiming that money from Greensboro?

“Before I would advocate laying off teachers, I would advocate reclaiming that money. Yes,” Berger said.

Semantics

No elected official likes to raise fees and taxes.

And that unease about spending taxpayer money had City Council members carefully considering their options about the 2010 water rates last week.

But Water Resources Director Allan Williams gave the council three options: use $2.1 million from a savings account; cut back maintenance projects to keep the rates flat; or increase water rates by 6 percent.

Putting off work on water lines was not a popular option. And at first, only four council members liked the idea of dipping into the city’s reserves. But they also expressed concern about asking residents to pay more in a difficult economic time.

So Councilman Robbie Perkins tried to talk council members through the options.

“OK, who wants to raise water rates 6 percent?” Perkins asked.

“That is not the right question,” Councilwoman T. Dianne Bellamy-Small said, to laughs from the audience.

Councilman Mike Barber offered another variation.

“Who wants to stab the taxpayer in the heart?”

Atwitter about Twitter

Thursday’s forum on local government, put on by Action Greensboro, was a sellout. Well, only they didn’t sell tickets.

But all 250 seats were taken, and some people even stood in the back of the room to listen to Mecklenburg County Manager Harry Jones; Mike Smith, dean of the UNC School of Government; and John Alexander, professor of leadership at Elon University Law School, speak on issues facing Guilford County .

And there was a larger audience elsewhere.

You’ve probably read about Twitter in these pages before. What’s interesting here is how the quick-hit online messaging system was used to submit questions and provide context during the event in conjunction with an online broadcast of the speakers.

It was a format that had at least one of the speakers feeling right at home. Jones said Mecklenburg commissioners “tweet” during meetings.

Smith leaves Twitter to younger users. “My children are on it,” he said. “I think it’s a generational difference.”

Well, we’re on Twitter. Check us out at twitter.com/NandRPolitics and follow Action Greensboro at twitter.com/synerGgso


Staff writers Mark Binker, Amanda Lehmert and Gerald Witt contributed.

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: Sen. Phil Berger

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Doug Johnson

June 29, 2009 - 5:31 am EDT

Exact reason NC is in the mess its in. Tax and spend liberals.
All liberals like to raise taxes. it how they get all that vote buying pork money.
I like to see this paper hire someone with the courage to report wasteful spending in this state.

Laura

June 29, 2009 - 8:58 am EDT

NO, you are wrong. Liberals do not "love to raise taxes." That shows incredible ignorance about government, and the responsiblities governments have to be responsive to citizens. That remark is as ignorant as saying "all conservatives hate progress," or, "all conservatives hate democracy." (only some of them do)

But you are right that governments -- whether led by conservatives or liberals -- always waste money, and that should be the issue. The Bush administration wrecked the economy and gave us the worst deficit and national debt in history with their wasteful, irresponsible ways. We will be paying for the conservative myth that the free market can solve all problems for generations.

The reality is that we live in a capitalistic economy, which is predicated on constant upward growth, which means revenues, whether in business or in government, always have to go up, and the only way to do that is to raise prices (taxes) or cut corners on quality or services. The issue should be, how do we rethink capitalism so that we can move toward a sustainable economy that benefits the most people.

connieohyeah

June 29, 2009 - 8:01 am EDT

Hmm... tough issue. Recently, while riding past the Coliseum and noticing the "Home of the ACC" banners, my friend said "Greensboro really should have some kind of Hall of Fame or ACC Museum since it's the ACC home." I excitedly replied, "There is one on the way; it's in the works!" Natives of Greensboro, we were both excited about this.

However, I didn't realize it was a government project. It seems like the Conference should fund some, if not all, of this project. It is a very good, cool thing for Greensboro to have - especially in tournament years. It kind of puts us on the map. It's a good thing for the city.

But, I'm no fan of pork spending. So I don't know what to do here. I think it may pay for itself in the future.

Is an online recording of the panel on Guilford politics and government available?

Edit: Perkins asked exactly the right question. Bellamy-Small was just upset she didn't add a Liberal tax and spend spin to it. I guess she's afraid of the truth, because that question cut straight to the chase.

igliigli

June 29, 2009 - 8:47 am EDT

The ACC Hall of Fame is not the only sports related rip-off. The Dean Dome has received over 35 MILLION in taxpayer subsidies since it was built. Or the 10 to 12 million yearly subsidy the UNC System sports booster clubs receive by paying in-state tuition for out-of-state athletes. Or the half million yearly UNC-CH student health fees that are used to pay Athletic Department trainers.
College sports, the biggest taxpayer and student rip-off around.

Laura

June 29, 2009 - 9:00 am EDT

"College sports, the biggest taxpayer and student rip-off around." Amen to that! I would add high school sports too.

DaveW

June 29, 2009 - 4:33 pm EDT

I disagree about high school and college sports being a ripoff.The student athletes involved benefit and it brings recognition to the school. Which means more students apply each year. A good example is Appalachian increasing applications due to the last 4 years of football success. This means their admissions department now selects higher quality academic credentials for admission(due to increased numbers of applicants for the same number of freshman spots). In other words, the freshman class gets stronger academically each year since more people apply.It becomes harder to get in ASU each year.
Now as for the ACC museum----------The ACC should foot the bill itself. It should have enough money to do so.

DaveW

June 29, 2009 - 4:35 pm EDT

You should visit the website carolinasucks.com. You would like it.

oh good grief

June 29, 2009 - 2:37 pm EDT

RE: Greensboro City Water ". . . three options: use $2.1 million from a savings account; cut back maintenance projects to keep the rates flat; or increase water rates by 6 percent."

ABSOLUTE NO to cutting back maintenance projects to keep rates flat. That's one reason (of many) why our water and sewer lines are in such a state of disrepair and why EVERYTHING is an EMERGENCY with the Water Department -- remember the holes (one of which was large enough to swallow a car and did) in Wendover Avenue due to an "aging" system not properly maintained or replaced in a timely manner.

Why not a COMBINATION of a water rate increase AND SOME money from a savings account?

IF the City's assumptions are correct about how much revenue would be raised by a 6% increase WITHOUT having to go into savings, it follows that if you raise the water rate by only 3% you would have to use only $1,050,000 from the savings account (leaving an extra $1,050,000 still in the savings account). OR the water rate could be raised by only 2% and the City would have to use $1,400,000 from the savings account (leaving an extra $700,000 still in the savings account).

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 55°
  • UV Idx: 2
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 60° L: 36°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search