news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

String of shootings keeps police busy

Sunday, June 28, 2009
(Updated Monday, June 29 - 7:06 am)

GREENSBORO — More than a dozen people have been wounded in a series of 24 shootings throughout the city from June 1 until Saturday afternoon. None has been fatal.

Despite the high number, Greensboro police say overall violent crime remains on a decline so far in 2009 and the department’s gun-violence reduction strategy is yielding positive results.

Department statistics through May indicate violent crime is down by 15 percent , compared with the same period in 2008.

“Most of (the shootings) have involved people who know one another at some level,” said Dwight Crotts, assistant police chief for the investigative bureau of Greensboro police. “Whether it’s a business transaction, so to speak, or a domestic or an argument. The majority of the cases are not random acts of violence.”

That may be of little consolation to people living on Maywood Street, which was the scene of four shootings in a six-day period earlier this month.

There were two separate shootings on one day — June 13. Two more people were injured when someone shot at a house on June 17.

A fourth shooting happened during a drive-by on a residence June 18, though no one was injured. All of the incidents are believed to be drug-related.

The June 17 shooting happened between 10 p.m. and midnight, a period in which police had five victims in three shootings all at separate locations.

Others that night included two men shot at Claremont Courts at 2704 Patio Place . Another man was shot in the ankle during a robbery at 1903 Cedar Fork Drive.

In addition to drugs and robbery, police attributed the shootings to gang violence and domestic situations. Five involved BB guns.

Of the 24 cases, police said they have cleared three by arrests, and warrants have been issued in other cases.

Despite the recent violent streak, officials believe the department is doing a good job of removing guns from the street since launching a 12-point gun violence reduction initiative in January.

Since Jan. 1, Crotts said 396 firearms have been removed from the streets — 316 were collected as evidence, 61 were confiscated and 19 were found by the public and turned in to police.

In most confiscations, which happen when an officer removes a weapon from a potentially dangerous situation, such as during a mental health call, the weapon is returned, Crotts said.

He estimated at least 330 firearms were removed from the streets permanently.

In most cases, when the firearm is not returned after being used as evidence, not found to be stolen, or not claimed, it is melted down and sold as scrap metal.

“We are still focusing on those discharge calls and getting our officers there as quickly as possible and doing investigations on those,” Crotts said. “We are still concentrating on seizing firearms.”

Police said of the shootings on Maywood Street, officers with the vice-narcotics unit are continuing to monitor street-level drug sales in an attempt to curb violence. Other specialized units are working to address robbery-related shootings.

Maywood Street residents say they would like an increased police presence in their neighborhood.

“We need more protection,” said M.B., a woman who lives in the 2000-block of the street, as she pointed to bullet holes on her house.

“We have crackheads and prostitutes walking up and down the street all the time. (Police) aren’t doing enough.”

She refused to give her full name, fearing retaliation.

Despite efforts to remove guns and drugs from the streets, police acknowledge there is only so much they can do to stop the violence.

“When people deal in high-risk behavior, they are putting themselves at a risk (to be victimized),” said Capt. Chris Walker, who oversees the department’s southern patrol district.

“Usually in drug cases, they don’t come to us and say 'I sold this guy drugs and now he wants to kill me.’”

Contact Ryan Seals at 373-7077 or ryan.seals@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

By Nelson J. Harrill

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

johnq2

June 28, 2009 - 7:08 am EDT

It's not the police that's the problem, it's the courts. The crackheads, prostitutes and other thugs that are causing problems have been in trouble before and have been put back out on the street with little or no consequences for their behavior. Before you vote for judges make sure you research their sentencing records.

Panacea

June 28, 2009 - 9:31 am EDT

You're right the problem is with the courts, but not in the way you are thinking. It's not the judges or the sentencing laws. It's the limited access to drug courts. They work. The recividism rate is about 30 percent, much lower than traditional punishment models.

Of course, we should still lock up violent offenders. But the addicts and prostitutes responsible for many petty, non-violent crimes would be better served by drug courts.

jsipe29

June 28, 2009 - 10:10 am EDT

Pan must live in his or her own little world. Your saying 30%? Does that mean that 70% go back on the drugs? I really don't like those odds. And how long does that 30% stay off drugs? Also, what do you consider "petty" "non-violent" crimes? Is that when these junkies break in our homes and nobody is physically hurt? Is it when they steal from merchants, causing law abiding citizens to pay more at the register? Please explain this to us. You make it sound like the junkie is the victim of our court system. I think the people who get out here and work and have things only to loose them to these drug addicted "victims" are really what I consider to be the victim.

CherylP25

June 29, 2009 - 9:39 am EDT

Recidivism means those who go back to crime; so if the recidivism rate is 30%, it means those who do NOT go back to crime is 70%, which is pretty good odds.

BEEBEE

June 28, 2009 - 5:22 pm EDT

I hope you're also willing to spend money on new jails. YOUR money, to keep them in jail.

Lakeshia

June 28, 2009 - 9:41 am EDT

I'm guessing a community's crime rate is directional proportional to the number of cars cruising around with oversized rent-to-own shiny chrome wheels and boom-boom sound systems blaring out hip-hop -

gboro84

June 28, 2009 - 10:20 am EDT

We can argue about the problem all day. The problem is the courts, no its the police etc...Let's talk solutions. The courts can only do so much and the jails can only hold so many, which means "lesser" criminals get let loose on us early all the time. The police can't be every place all day. It's not their fault. The solutions lies in the communities. When you see a drug dealer/addict loitering for business, or prostitutes and their clients, then let those people know that they are not welcome if they are in the neighborhood for illegal activities. Yes, some of these thugs get mouthy and violent, that's where we need to step up OUR game and let the KNOW their presence will not be tolerated. It's time to take out communities back. I'm so sick of hearing "where were the police??". Where is our fortitude and dedication? Another thing, why is it that in some circles it is looked down upon to inform the authorities of illegal activity? People call it snitching, but I call it taking care of your community. Teach your kids that nothing is wrong with speaking out against injustice and stop calling it "snitching" like it is detestable behavior.

gboro84

June 28, 2009 - 10:24 am EDT

Also, get to know your neighbors. Talk to them, take their trash cans to the curb, help them bring their groceries in. This promotes unity and respect. When everyone knows each other and gets along, then the dealers and hookers seem very out of place. When you don't know your neighbors, you never know if that guy sitting in a car at the back of the parking lot is waiting to sell some drugs, or if he is hanging out at a neighbors. People have gotten so used to "minding there own business" that is now unacceptable to pull up next to an unfamiliar face or car and ask "so what are you doing over here?" We have to change this.

buzzman

June 28, 2009 - 2:18 pm EDT

Lakeshia - Say whaaaaaat????? Are you responding to THIS article?

gboro84

June 28, 2009 - 2:32 pm EDT

Enough is enough! I've had it with these rich white men ruining this city. News and Record has another article posted today about how whites arent letting enough blacks be appointed to city boards by our black mayor!! This is otrageous and now we have these evil lawyers shooting up our neighborhoods! What are we going to do? We should be looking to the young black men in this city for guidance. These men would never rob steal and kill their own people! By the way, what exactly ARE the demographics of the perpetrators and victims of these shootings? hmmmm???

a9faninnc

June 29, 2009 - 4:42 am EDT

Love the sarcasm 84.Demographics will never be published by this paper..

theluvbear

June 28, 2009 - 5:25 pm EDT

Whoa,whoa,whoa gbor84-you back up_don"t make this a racist issue.White people shoot their own just as you all do.It"s not just the rich white men but also your black mayor.Just about all the incidents with shootings were young black males,go back and read your news more.It is all races white,black,mexican,etc.CRIME HAS NO SKIN TONE NEITHER DOES YOUR PUNISHMENT.God"s people all bleed red blood and they all are his children and equally judged.There are both white and black who have been charged with a wrong doing they have not committed and it"s very sad that they would have to experience this.Pointing fingers and screaming racism is not the answer.Neither skin color is safe in today's world.Live and let live and be proud of your roots and I agree know your neighbors and extend your courtesies.

TSTMSTR

June 28, 2009 - 7:50 pm EDT

Speaking as a person with absolutely NO faith in the judicial system... unless you have money to fight the battle you lose. I have seen people get falsely charged for crimes they didn't commit and because they didn't fit the criteria to obtain an attorney they actually received active sentences. We are giving these "criminals" the means to get lighter or in some cases NO sentences. Probation officers are in this solely for the money and the well being of their "client" is far on the back burner. This entire system needs an overhaul from the foundation to the rafters and the roof needs to be completely torn off so the corruption can be exposed and dealt with.

newkid

June 28, 2009 - 11:18 pm EDT

Yeah, probation officers are in it only for the money. Otherwise they would have gone into something less lucrative like bank CEO, professional sports player, or hair stylist.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 54°
  • UV Idx: 3
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 62° L: 43°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search