news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

United Guaranty cutting 160 jobs

Wednesday, June 24, 2009
(Updated 7:51 am)

GREENSBORO — United Guaranty, the troubled mortgage insurer based in Greensboro, is laying off 160 workers, most of them in North Carolina, the company said Tuesday.

“Ongoing and challenging market conditions require this step be taken,” said Eric Martinez, the company’s chief executive officer, in a statement.

The company declined to say how many of the job cuts would be at its headquarters on North Elm Street, where about 500 people work. The company said that jobs in the office and the field would be cut, however.

United Guaranty employs about 950 people worldwide.

Assuming that the total in Greensboro is close to 160, said local leaders, the city’s economy will take a hard blow.

“You hate to see any business downsize and particularly the quality and the type of people that have been involved at United Guaranty,” said Pat Danahy, the chief executive officer of economic development agency The Greensboro Partnership.

Cuts may be crucial to keeping the company healthy, Danahy said, but it doesn’t cushion the effect on the jobless.

“This is a day you hate to see for the people involved and for the less-than-positive impact on both the downtown and our economy in general,” Danahy said.

United Guaranty said the workers will all receive outplacement services and a “working notice period” to help remaining workers take over jobs, the statement said.

Dozens of workers streaming out of the headquarters during the lunch hour declined to give interviews because the company had told them not to speak with the media.

Losing jobs is an obvious trauma to the city, but philanthropists say any erosion of corporate leadership also hurts foundations and charities.

“United Guaranty is clearly one of our leading executive-type employment entities in the community,” said Ed Kitchen, vice president of the Joseph M. Bryan Foundation.

Billy Nutt, United Guaranty’s former CEO who was forced out of the company earlier this month, serves on the foundation’s board.

“When we first heard about Billy Nutt, that was a real blow in terms of his corporate leadership,” Kitchen said.

Nutt and his executives have supported the United Way, local public education and other major community causes, Kitchen said.

“The loss of those kinds of jobs hurts us a great deal.”

A subsidiary of American International Group, United Guaranty was battered in the world financial crisis, losing $2.5 billion last year.

Nutt, with 30 years of experience at the company, was replaced by Martinez from AIG headquarters.

In addition to Tuesday’s layoffs, remaining employees are wondering whether AIG intends to keep United Guaranty, sell it or even go to the extreme of doing a “runoff,” where it would stop writing policies and slowly go out of business.

All options are on the table now, the company has said.

For the moment, it will be almost impossible for business recruitment groups like Danahy’s partnership to lure jobs to replace those being lost.

“The overall international global economy has got to improve before we’re going to see a significant move toward jobs being created,” Danahy said, “as opposed to being lost.”

Contact Richard M. Barron at 373-7371 or richard.barron@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Joseph Rodriguez (News & Record)

Photo Caption: AIG’s United Guaranty Corp. in Greensboro.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Gator

June 23, 2009 - 10:48 am EDT

Ahh No worries. Perdue will tax the industries making money. She created 50 new jobs with the apple storage unit

AIGsucks

June 23, 2009 - 12:58 pm EDT

Nothing to worry about, 160 isn't a big deal. It is less than 15% of the workforce. I am sure this is just another wave though and the tidal wave still hasn't hit.

damask5

June 23, 2009 - 12:59 pm EDT

Terrible! I feel so badly for my former colleagues and friends there. On the other hand I do not feel sorry one bit for any of the management teams that get their walking papers... too bad most will not lose their jobs, even though their crappy policies and terrible political alignments are what have caused most of this... when will liberals realize that you can not screw with FREE ENTERPRISE and capitalism!?!?! Maybe Obama will come and save everyone... NOT!

tledford

June 23, 2009 - 1:24 pm EDT

"You are now entering -- The Twilight Zone." (music) Doo-wee ahhh! Da da da da da da dum!

Paul J

June 23, 2009 - 2:07 pm EDT

this happened long before Obama . The Republicans passed the credit derivatives act.

Brainwash

June 23, 2009 - 3:11 pm EDT

I was agreeing with you up until...

"when will liberals realize that you can not screw with FREE ENTERPRISE and capitalism!?!?! Maybe Obama will come and save everyone... NOT!"

Then I forgot what you wrote.

NRay

June 24, 2009 - 7:52 am EDT

Damask5:
If President Bush had not "screwed with capitalism" AIG would have been gone entirely long before the election of President Obama, and all of your friends there would now have been out of work for 8 months or so. Unfortunately also, the best evidence indicates that failure may well have taken down your entire beloved "capitalist" financial structure. Many of the rest of us, perhaps even you, would now be unemployed. Maybe also you would not be quite so flip about President Obama's efforts to clean up the spill for years of toxic financial practices.

What would you do now? What would you have advised President Bush to do when the mess AIG's leadership made for us all first came to light? We would all really like to know.

damask5

June 24, 2009 - 3:19 pm EDT

President Bush?? Why is it that liberals always wanna blame everything on Bush... that is the biggest LIE and B/S and I am for one tired of hearing it... do some damn research it! This entire problem actually started with Clinton when he pushed for and GOT passed the law requiring lenders to lend people money for homes that they COULD Not afford (enter the subprime mortgage!) UG for awhile stayed out of this and remained a VERY profitable company... however when Liberals the 4-5yrs got involved (Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and your beloved Obama - they were the top three in donations from AIG!) is when the !%!^ really hit the fan... Oh and btw, the former CEO and the former CEO of Countrywide were very close friends and they along with a lot of their 'yes' men became even bigger donors to the DNC! Obama has done nothing to help our country, only put us into a deeper and deeper recession ALL as a major political power 'grab' to allow the government to take control of everything... So don't tell me this has anything to do with capitalism or Bush... it has everything to do with GREED and a lack of MORAL principles by LIBERALS who are throwing our country into an abyss that unless we all stand up and do something about I don't see us ever getting out of!

justaguy46

June 23, 2009 - 1:19 pm EDT

I agree with the oncoming tidal wave. Currently, consumers are spending savings, cashing in the remains of 401k's, and borrowing money from their parents to make up the difference of shortfalls or to take advantage of discounts offered on major purchases. As we all know, online shopping, gambling, affairs, and drugs has led this Country to bankruptcy. I estimate after labor day of this year, the stock market wll begin to crumble, after the Christmas season, it will fall. Buckle up buttercups, it's gonna be rough ride!

tledford

June 23, 2009 - 1:24 pm EDT

"As we all know, online shopping, gambling, affairs, and drugs has led this Country to bankruptcy."

WTF?

"You are now entering -- The Twilight Zone." (music) Doo-wee ahhh! Da da da da da da dum!

Brainwash

June 23, 2009 - 3:26 pm EDT

"As we all know, online shopping, gambling, affairs, and drugs has led this Country to bankruptcy."

Really?... What about greed?

Illiterati

June 23, 2009 - 7:40 pm EDT

Online shopping? Really? That's funny, because I shop online for the stuff I need because I can get it cheaper and usually with free shipping and no tax, which actually keeps me OUT of bankruptcy.

Now, my affairs...those are what's really driving me into the poor house!

JeepRover

June 23, 2009 - 9:36 pm EDT

@justaguy46: OK. Let me see if I get this straight...*Ahem* You are hedging your entire argument on 4 components: online shopping, gambling, affairs and drugs. In your opinion, are these new pitfalls, because as far as I can remember drugs have been around since the beginning of time, affairs went usually hand in hand with drugs and gambling has been around way before America was even thought of. So, really, 3 of your arguments are muted since they have been in existence longer than America and therefore cannot be the cause of our downfall. You are in essence basing your whole argument-which is a weak one-on online shopping. Do I understand you correctly, because that is pretty near the silliest thing I have heard all week! Thanks for the laugh. I'll definitely be looking for more of your post.

MtgInsChick

June 23, 2009 - 3:13 pm EDT

Is this one of those "we're going to lay off lots of people, but not let them know for a few more weeks" that has happened at UG so many times recently, or do the people impacted already know? Is it mostly on the production and sales side? Is it, once again, worker bees? It seems like there are few non-management people left!

I got a couple calls last week from former co-workers, but have been playing phone tag. In the back of my mind, I assumed it might be people out of jobs, but wasn't sure.

Aren't there only two field offices left? Between those offices and all sales people, are there even 160 people working in the field?

LONESTAR

June 23, 2009 - 10:52 pm EDT

160 employees to lose thier jobs, I bet they havent even been notified. Of course they will cut employees and continue to leave the worthless management in place.

AIGsucks

June 23, 2009 - 11:37 pm EDT

Warning fired employees not to speak to the media?? Isn't this America?...Give me a Break..we all know the Managment SUCKS! And they are probably still there to SUCK some more! In fact, we the people of the US own this lousy money losing company! It is about time America VOTES on what to do with the lousy management at UGC.

"United Guaranty continues to underwrite new loans and is ready to book solid, profitable business, offering high-quality products at competitive rates," said new CEO Eric Martinez in a written statement. "Even so, ongoing and challenging market conditions require this step be taken." Spin, SPIN and more SPIN from taxpayers company! Another comment to try and keep the workes who are are going to WORKED to DEATH to not leave!

Since 1963, the company has been a strong partner with the city of Greensboro, said April Harris, the executive director of Action Greensboro.

"They were the largest corporate donor for Center City Park, and their employees had volunteered extensively in the community," she said, noting that the layoffs "come at a time when we need strong public-private partnerships." Maybe they should do real good for the downtown area of Greensboro and keep their riches for a rainy day fund to keep from laying off employees instead of GIVING it AWAY to make a NAME for their EX CEO!!

AIGsucks

June 23, 2009 - 11:43 pm EDT

People go to the front page of the News and Observer and check out the Raleigh based insurance company that posted a loss last year and LAID off NO-ONE!! Repeat LAID OFF NO ONE! The CEO gives great benefits to his employees and treats them like family!

Maybe UGC should follow this small 100 person company! They placed money in a rainy day fund to avoid layoffs! The CEO says he could have cut a dozen positions and posted a profit last year but did not do that because it would affect his great employees of his company.

NOW that is a good corporate citizen! UGC take note...and Mr. Martiniez do the right thing don't cut all the hard working people that do the work and keep that lousy senior management team intact! I am sure you cut some wonderful people! But that inner circle from the last CEO all deserve to go....they are real causes of this money losing machine! You want to allign cost....cut them...cut them all!

Jdubya

June 23, 2009 - 11:57 pm EDT

Now tell us how you really feel!! Ha!

The_Truth

June 25, 2009 - 12:25 am EDT

That CEO just doesn't want them coming looking at his operation...Hell, he's probably got so much shareholder (OWNER'S) money he could prop it up a couple more years...Bet he hasn't sold his boat, his house on the beach. PLEASE man...Do NONE of you get business....it's cash flow, plain and simple.....AND put him on a lie detector, NO company saves money back for times when they need to pay employees NOT to work. NO, sorry, I'm wrong, they do, it's called Unemployment Insurance payments, they make them every month to the Feds...GET A GRIP!

MtgInsChick

June 25, 2009 - 9:03 am EDT

The_Truth - You couldn't be more misguided. Good businesses do save up to pay employees who are not needed during the bad times so the employees will be there in the good times. According to you, a factory that slows down for a couple weeks should fire all the employees because those employees aren't needed at the moment. Good businesses plan for long term success. They do not react to the short term fluctuations. Part of that is having money set aside to pay for the downturns, including the long term planning of keeping employees now that will be assets in the long term.

Most companies today are run by CEOs who are more interested in lining their pockets in the short term rather than the company's long term health. When there is an uptick in profits, the modern CEO pays himself a bonus. When there is a downturn, there is no money to cushion the company. Short term layoffs lead to a reputation as a place good employees do not want to work, so the company hires a "B" team of workers when things get better. Quality suffers. We have seen scores of companies destroyed by these CEOs. Companies that are run by CEOs that care about the company and that treat workers as part of the family do not have these issues. That thinking is just flat out wrong.

While AIG is the poster child for what happens when senior management looks to line its pockets quickly, Chrysler, Washington Mutual, and Worlcom come to mind.

The bigger issue is by letting so many employees go for good, UG is making the statement that those job functions are gone for good. It points more and more to the company taking steps to stop writing significant new business and just deal with the policies already in force. It might be "only 15%" this time, but add that to the other layoffs over the past couple years. UG seems to have shrunken in half. Many people have been moved into collections jobs. My understanding is that was one area of the company not touched yesterday. You have to wonder if UG has gutted the part of the company that puts new business into force because those people will not be needed in the future.

The_Truth

June 25, 2009 - 10:50 pm EDT

Looks to me like they DID keep the good employees that would be assests in the upturn...Don't tell me business unless you have one yourself.

The_Truth

June 25, 2009 - 11:00 pm EDT

Um, you are not too familiar with manufacturing if you think they do not have lay-offs in down swings. Ever heard of that? Temporary plant shutdowns? hhhhhhhhhmmmm???????????????????

Ergo

June 24, 2009 - 8:46 am EDT

I think it's really helpful that you're posting wild, non-fact-based speculation.

AIGsucks

June 25, 2009 - 1:15 pm EDT

name something that I said that isn't factual.

Ergo

June 25, 2009 - 8:28 pm EDT

I haven't commented on any of your posts.

The_Truth

June 25, 2009 - 11:01 pm EDT

I just did.

damask5

June 24, 2009 - 3:23 pm EDT

Lonestar, they were notified at work on Tuesday... watch the Fox8 news and you will see former employee's wheeling out their belongings with some of the still remaining employee's helping them... very sad day for many of my friends and colleagues! And btw, yes I know how they feel, been there done that and am unemployed again now!

LensGirls

June 24, 2009 - 9:19 pm EDT

My question is this . . . is MD (Mr. Claims) still employed with UG? If so, AIG did not send the most business savvy CEO for the job. Why leave someone in charge of making the decisions about the company's claims paying capabilities that doesn't have enough sense to balance a checkbook! Oh, I remember, this is how UG rolls! You'd think they would learn from their mistakes.

The_Truth

June 25, 2009 - 12:17 am EDT

Ever think maybe they just didn't need you guys anymore? I mean it is economics...Noone eliminates assests in good or bad times....you eliminate liabilities...Liabilities hold up your hands, come on...let's see 'em....come on....Oh, noone here ever ran a business I assume...Just let it go and go to work. Spend some time with your wife or family for God's sakes instead of crying here.

AIGsucks

June 25, 2009 - 1:17 pm EDT

The_Truth guess you will be next as soon as the new ceo figures you out. Mr. Martinez doesn't need any Billy Butt Kissers around anymore either.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 42°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 62° L: 43°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search