news-record.com

OPINION

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Editorial: Hagan in the middle

Wednesday, June 24, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

North Carolina's two senators stand in different places on the hotly debated health care issue. Both may be in the right place, for now.

Republican Richard Burr staked out a position early, co-sponsoring a bill in May that other members of his party may rally around. It provides tax credits for individuals and families to purchase private health insurance and adds measures aimed at expanding coverage and holding down rates.

His plan won't prevail, but it might contain some features Democrats would adopt in exchange for Republican cooperation.

Democrat Kay Hagan, meanwhile, is not committed to any proposal. In particular, she hasn't yet embraced a public-option component advanced by President Barack Obama and backed by many Democrats in Congress.

Hagan's reluctance has invited pressure from key constituent groups in her party, some of which are funding a media campaign asking voters to urge their senators and representatives to support the president. Polls show strong approval of a public option.

Although Obama wants a bill on his desk by October, Hagan isn't rushing a decision. She's taking a wise and cautious approach, considering all the details that haven't been laid out.

Hagan's concerns include the impact on private insurers of a public option. A government-run program is touted as a means to increase competition and force down prices, but if it pushes companies out of business through subsidized pricing or one-sided regulations, the end result will be less competition.

At the same time, there must be a guarantee of affordable coverage for people who are currently denied because of pre-existing conditions or other risk factors. The Burr plan calls for "state-based health exchanges," which he describes as "a voluntary, one-stop marketplace of insurance plans." That might be a step in the right direction, but what's "voluntary" is likely to leave out some who ought to be included.

Hagan affirms that "everybody should be covered." She's also focusing on access to medical providers, efficiency in health care delivery and prevention as well as treatment.

The freshman from Greensboro proved during her 10 years as a state senator and already during her short tenure in Washington that health care is one of her priorities. Constituents should trust her to find practical solutions -- although she could put their minds at ease by shedding significant personal or family investments in health care companies. The fact is, however, that successful reform must involve government and industry, retaining what already works but replacing what doesn't. Hagan's experience shows she can work effectively with the public and private sectors.

Too many politicians are stuck in fixed positions. Hagan thinks she can "bridge the divide and get things done." That's important.

The real divide in this country now is the gap between many Americans and health care security. It will take serious bridge-building to fix it.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

miktay

June 24, 2009 - 7:29 am EDT

The facts that Sen. Hagan has a ten plus year record on health care reform AND has significant investments in health care companies AND she will not make a clear commitment to a strong public health care option makes me very nervous. She has not responded to my e-mails and calls to her office on the subject. I voted for her because I expected her to stand with President Obama to push for real reform. She needs to stop listening to the well-heeled corporate lobbyists that are whispering in her ear and stuffling her campaign war chest. She needs to listen to the ordinary people of North Carolina who are struggling to get by. We deserve representation too!

Sawdust

June 24, 2009 - 8:31 am EDT

Thank God we have a Democrat who is not just blindly following Obama and his budget-busting plan. As if we had any budget left to bust. According to the CBO, the Messiah's plan will cost between a trillion and 1.6 trillion to cover a third of the uninsured for 10 years, or 3 to 5 trillion for everyone, whereas a plan like Burr's could be done for about a tenth of that without leading to a complete takeover by the feds. Considering, of course, that we get the illegals off the health care rolls and back to Mexico. Can't do that, though, Illegal immigrant=future Democrat.

dcolin

June 24, 2009 - 11:18 pm EDT

Ah, The evil feds.

If private insurance is sooo much better and more efficient and government screws up everything:

Why are they ( insurance companies )afraid of competing with it?

ChipK

June 25, 2009 - 3:20 pm EDT

Because it wouldn't be competition. The government makes up the rules (as it goes along), which would not apply equally to all, and it plays in the game. That is hardly what anybody would call competition.

dcolin

June 24, 2009 - 11:17 pm EDT

Actually.

If you really think about it there are no illegal immigrants

It's late I'm tired I will explain tomorrow.

Panacea

June 24, 2009 - 11:25 am EDT

Hagan has her priorities screwed up. Millions are either uninsured or underinsured, and she's worried about how it will affect insurance companies?

When fire insurance was first made available in this country, people who bought policies were buying to have firefighters come out and put out fires on their property, not to replace lost property. If the policy holder was worried about a fire on a neighboring property who didn't have insurance, the firefighters would not put out the fire until the policy holder's property was ablaze.

It was a stupid system. We did away with it and went to government sponsored/community sponsored fire fighting whose sole job is to put out fires. Period. Not to worry about whether there was a rider, or if a policy holder was paid up on the policy.

Insurance companies adapted or went out of business. It did not end the world.

Health insurance companies will either adapt to a public option system, or go out of business. Either way, it's their problem, not government's.

We need to get health care away from the business model, and back to the service model (like firefighting and law enforcement). A public option is the best way (right now) for us to do this.

dcolin

June 24, 2009 - 11:20 pm EDT

That was very interesting.
Honest, Honest?

I had no idea.

busdoc

June 29, 2009 - 6:01 pm EDT

Then we shouldn't bailed out GM, AIG, Banks, Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac. Let them go bankrupt as well.

busdoc

June 29, 2009 - 6:08 pm EDT

Private business can not compete with the government because the government does not have to profit. It just keeps borrowing money to fund these social programs. My question is, the Democrats claim that 50 million people are uninsured in this country, and yet their own people state that their plan will still leave 50 million uninsured. Is this the change they believe in?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 45°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 0° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search