GREENSBORO — Neighbors from three McLeansville subdivisions are suing the city of Greensboro for annexing them.
Judge Ripley Rand issued a temporary restraining order against the city and will hear arguments in the case June 29, hours before the June 30 annexation is scheduled to take place.
It’s the latest move by area residents to stop the city from annexing 151 acres in the county.
City Planning Director Dick Hails said the city has temporarily held back on preparations to add city services to the area while the legal issues are sorted out.
Between 1997 and 2000, developers of the Whitehurst Village, Hartwood Village and Laurel Park subdivisions — located just east of the city off I-85 in the area of Mount Hope Church Road — asked the city to annex the land in exchange for Greensboro water and sewer. Residents currently have those services.
“The legal department and the planning department from the city of Greensboro has been making this deal with developers throughout the county for the last 10 years or so,” said Lyle Cunningham, an officer of the Whitehurst Village homeowners association and one of four plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
By 2008, when the city got around to taking action on annexing the three subdivisions, neighbors told the City Council they were not aware they were scheduled to become part of Greensboro.
The City Council voted to wait a year to make the annexation decision.
When the second annexation hearing came around in April 2009, 39 homeowners signed petitions to withdraw the annexation requests made by the developers years ago. City Attorney Terry Wood said the petitions had no legal standing and the council members approved the annexation after two readings of the issue.
That petition to withdraw may be one of the lawsuit issues that will be argued in court next week.
“We just want to be fair to everybody,” said Wood, who said the city has worked in good faith to fulfill its obligations in the annexation. “We’re not trying to do anything behind anyone’s back.”
Neighbors have argued that Greensboro will not be able to provide them city amenities such as bus service, public parks or adequate police service. Residents have said it is unfair that the city is annexing them now, when the only land that connects them to the city limits is the interstate.
“We are hoping that the court will declare the petition for annexation null and void and require the city to become contiguous to the area just like they did with the Cardinal,” Cunningham said. “The city grew out to the Cardinal.”
Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.