news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

After 10 years, he's homeless no more

Saturday, June 20, 2009
(Updated Sunday, June 21 - 6:38 am)

We’re never given more load than we can carry, it’s said.

But is that true?

On the first Sunday morning in June at Centenary United Methodist Church, a young family gets up to change pews.

They move from behind where Mark Hoffmann, 51, the city’s most high-profile street person, sits every Sunday. They walk all the way to the other side of the church.

Later, a white-haired church elder in a suit, part of the team that three days earlier helped Hoffmann move into his first apartment in 10 years, leans over to explain.

“It was too much for them,” George Cranford tells Hoffmann, referring to the odor of Hoffmann’s black down coat. Hoffmann has worn the coat daily for a year, be it 10 degrees or 90 degrees, and refuses to let it out of his sight, even to be laundered.

Hoffmann — eyes fixed on the altar, lips moving silently, either in prayer or in conversation with voices no one else hears — gives Cranford a nod.

Step by step, this is a journey back to life, Lazarus-style, of a man whose estranged siblings had him declared legally dead in 1996 in an effort to settle an estate back in Maryland.

Little did they know that Hoffmann had wound up in Greensboro, 328 miles away, via Kansas, keeping a mysterious vigil on a park bench near Friendly Center. A year ago he left without explanation, road map in hand, walking and hitchhiking home to Maryland, then returning here this spring the same way.

He spent his last night outside June 3, when a flooded Buffalo Creek rose as high as the Lake Daniel park bridge where Hoffmann was known to camp.

“I got wet,” was all he reported the next day. “I’m OK.”

By the next night, for the first time in a decade, Greensboro’s best-known homeless man was homeless no more, ready to move into a HUD-subsidized unit with help from Centenary United Methodist Church.

Old habits die hard, however. He still ate soup cold out of the can. He showered but put the same soiled clothes back on. And he slept on the floor, next to the bed that Clara Ellis, his church sponsor, had made up.

Clearly, there were more steps to go. But for now, he had a key and a place to put down the baggage he has carried this far.

It is a journey that homeless advocates have watched with interest, and for good reason.

This month, the state informed the Housing Support Teams — shock troops responsible for finding chronically homeless people and getting them permanent shelter — that the plug is being pulled on their program July 1 and that there likely won’t be new funds until October.

Meanwhile, with the economy in a tailspin, homeless shelters are at capacity, and rental vacancy rates and evictions are up.

So, as with last winter’s emergency that saw local churches and community centers respond by opening their doors to 100 homeless people, the story of Mark Hoffmann and Centenary was planting a seed.

“I had a lady say to me about Mark, 'I wonder if my church could do something like that,’ ” Ellis, 76, said this week. “I told her, 'Well there’s not a thing standing in your way.’ ”

Then again, Ellis, the youngest of 10 children to grow up on a farm in Murphy, is a determined woman.

And like the enigmatic homeless man who showed up at her church on Easter in 2001, and has since become like a son to her, Ellis has a tendency toward understatement.

 

Mitch McGee got up at 5:30 a.m. Wednesday and made his bed. Then he sat down on it.

What do I do now?

He is a Housing Support specialist. Apart from filling out paperwork, his job, in a nutshell, is to go out at dawn and peer under bridges, behind loading docks and in abandoned cars to look for chronically homeless people and get them into housing.

These are often the people who use the most resources, cycling in and out of jails and hospitals. Hence, the purpose of the state grant that has been paying the teams’ salaries: Show how much money they can save the system, and the state will broaden the teams to work with other homeless people. The newly homeless, perhaps. Those between jobs, say, with a couple of kids in tow.

Did it work?

Evidently so. The Jordan Institute in Chapel Hill estimated that in its first year, Guilford County’s pilot project saved the system $97,000 in jail and hospital bills for the first 15 clients to be housed.

But as McGee sat on his neatly made bed, he faced the same problem he had gone to sleep with the night before.

It didn’t matter how much money the program was saving the state. There was no money. Not only were the assistants being laid off for the summer, but the program was basically being put on hold until Oct. 1.

What do I do now?

He would check in with Ellis, to see about Hoffmann.

“This is the most fun I’ve had in months,” McGee, 51, said. “And Mark’s not even a client.”

In fact, Hoffmann did not fit the team’s grant criteria, seeing as he had not been in jail, had no drug or alcohol issues and had not been in the hospital, as far as anyone knew, since the 1980s.

Most of the time-consuming tasks that usually fall to McGee — obtaining a duplicate birth certificate, for instance, or a state ID from the DMV, getting utilities turned on — were in this case done by others.

“Every time I would ask the church people something — 'Did you get a spare key made?’ ” McGee said, “They’d say, 'Oh, we already did that.’ Usually, it’s me trying to find the time to do all these things.”

It was a two-way street. Ellis, though resourceful and tireless, had no experience with the byzantine social services system. There, McGee was in his element after 25 years in private social work.

So it was that Hoffmann quickly moved up a waiting list for a rental housing voucher and did a food stamp interview at Centenary by speakerphone, with the help of McGee’s assistant.

Shy about accepting help, Hoffmann was reluctant about the application.

“If you don’t want it, Mark,” Ellis said, joking, “I’ll take it.”

Hoffmann replied softly: “I kind of need to know which side of the fence you’re on.”

“I’m on your side of the fence,” Ellis said, tugging at his arm. “And I’ve been on your side of the fence all these years.”

Without the involvement of Ellis and her husband, Don, Centenary’s longtime retired pastor, McGee felt he would have taken much longer to gain Hoffmann’s trust and perhaps would not have gained it at all.

It was, after all, Ellis who persuaded Hoffmann to come back to Greensboro after a cold, somewhat inhospitable winter in his hometown of Catonsville, Md.

Earlier this spring, the couple took Hoffmann to a favorite breakfast spot, Tex & Shirley’s. The waitresses crowded around, telling Hoffmann they were relieved he was back.

Last week, Ellis went to her cardiologist. The doctor closed the door to the examining room and looked her in the eye.

“Now, Clara,” the doctor said, “tell me about the man on the bench.”

Why did Hoffmann have this effect, not just for passers-by unlikely to get involved, but even for McGee, who does outreach for a living?

“There’s no guile,” McGee said of Hoffmann.

“With some folks you meet, you’ve got to kind of sort out what’s real and what’s not. With Mark, there’s just something very real there, and you know (he) needs help to get inside.”

Both McGee and Ellis expressed a sense of failure, of missed opportunity, when Hoffmann vanished a year ago.

McGee has often said Hoffmann put a face on homelessness. For Ellis, it went deeper.

“He was a godsend. I really believe that he has changed some people’s thinking. But not all people,” Ellis said, recalling an instance when a church member gave Hoffmann a sleeping bag and another objected, asking, “Are we going to support that kind of lifestyle?”

 

At dusk June 3, just as Centenary’s team had Hoffmann’s apartment ready for him to move in the next day, Beth McKee-Huger suddenly feared it could be one last missed opportunity, a day too late.

As she and her husband, Ray, drove through Lake Daniel, the Greensboro Housing Coalition director watched in alarm as the creek at Hoffmann’s usual spot crested at the bridge.

“I said, 'Mark’s supposed to be getting into his housing tomorrow!’ ” McKee-Huger recalled. “Two blocks later, Ray said, 'There he is!’ ”

If Hoffmann’s winding tale had so intrigued Greensboro, what will the effect be of the apparent resolution Centenary and McGee together brought to his story?

For McKee-Huger, whose nonprofit staff daily watches the troubled economic waters rise, Hoffmann represents a growing, mostly unseen population.

And with the state pulling back on the Housing First initiative that pays for the support teams, McKee-Huger took heart in the teamwork performed between church volunteers and a professional social worker.

“Getting Mark into housing is a huge thing for us to celebrate because there are a lot of people like him who need help,” McKee-Huger said.

“Getting people into housing costs a lot of money. And that money has got to come from somewhere. There has got to be a bridge to get us through this time.”

Meanwhile, the last time Ellis stopped in at Hoffmann’s apartment, he had been watching a ballgame in his bedroom. She noticed the covers turned down on his bed.

As if one of these nights, who knows? He might climb in.

Contact Lorraine Ahearn at 373-7334 or lorraine.ahearn@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Joseph Rodriguez (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Clara Ellis (from left), Mark Hoffman and Mitch McGee.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

ncb

June 20, 2009 - 8:29 am EDT

He'll be back on the streets within 2 months. Dogooders have great intentions but arrogantly believe that everyone desires or is cable of rocking the white picket fence

otdushi

June 20, 2009 - 9:00 am EDT

Actually, I had someone come speak to our church group about this. The report on the Housing First Initiatives is pretty telling. The Housing Support Teams, like the one mentioned in the article, are kind of successful. Of course, you can't save everyone, but the success rate for keeping folks housed and rehabilitating them is something like 80% successful. There's some good information, including a link to the study on this website: http://www.partnersendinghomelessness.org/ . It might be a good idea to give it a scan-through, as it's always good to learn a little about a topic before making a lot of judgments. This might finally be something that will work.

asitis

June 20, 2009 - 9:05 am EDT

It is obvious that some of the homeless people of Greensboro have mental health issues. In the old Union Cemetery, behind a grave marker, is the cardboard bed of one of Greensboro's homeless. I watch for him and wonder about him. Perhaps I should approach him, but... I hesitate out of fear. Finally, I saw him. He is an aged man.

Personally, I have witnessed a man eating from a dumpster at a local fast food restaurant. I witnessed a man walking on Bessemer Avenue, talking and shaking his fists at the sky. Obviously, he was seeing things that I wasn't, and obviously he suffers from mental illness.

Though the health issue may not be obvious, many of these individuals are sick and deserve human compassion.

JKcares

June 20, 2009 - 9:21 am EDT

But should that stop us form trying? Every now and then there will be someone who responds. In baseball you getin the Hall of Fame by reaching base 1 out of 3 times. Lets try to be homeless Hall of Famers and be successful one out of three times we try to help the homeless.

Theo

June 20, 2009 - 9:56 am EDT

I know they are trying to help but I must agree with ncb because this is not the first time someone has tried to help him. I hope it works but we have a 11% unemployment rate in this State. I think it's time we help someone who really wants our help!!! I know you get a warm fuzzy helping a homeless person but does he really want your help?

JKcares

June 20, 2009 - 9:19 am EDT

While it is very easy to be skeptical of the homeless, we are called to love and help each other. I have been touched by the willingness of Centenary Methodist to reach out and care for Mark over the years. The story makes me wonder what would the reaction have been in my own church if Mark had entered our doors years ago? Our church has made ending homeless and hunger in Greensboro a priority and we are working on several initiatives. But these are at arm's length. With the number of churches in Greensboro, if each one "adopted" a homeless person, or family, we could make significant progress to help the homeless. I am not so naive to beleive every homeless person will accept help (as Mark has been resistant), but why can't we offer the help? At the end of the day, the most important thing is that we try; we will be successful if we help even a few people for a little while.
Greensboro (and all communities) will continue to see our homeless numbers increase in coming months as the Repression deepens. Families who would never envision being homeless or in need of help will be. State funding will continue to be reduced or eliminated. Given the increasing unemployment rate in NC, it is doubtful that the homeless funding will increase any time soon. Now is the time to start looking outward and helping each other. Starting with those who are homeless.

lgrimestriad

June 20, 2009 - 9:25 am EDT

We will also see an increase in the homeless as we continue to cut funding for services for those with mental health issues. It is difficult enough now to get services in place and keep people utilizing them. Once services are cut it will be even more difficult.

charlie

June 20, 2009 - 12:03 pm EDT

This discussion is touching a very fundamental question. Why is there this huge discrepancy between those who lose (for whatever reason) everything in their life or those who never got a chance in life and those who have three house, five cars, tons of jewelery and plenty of more things they do not need? Should a society not equally distribute the resources among all members?
Some might say, that those who do not have anything did not try hard enough. Is that true? It has to be looked at from case to case. Sometimes a mental illness or a bad family situation does not give a person an equal opportunity in life, in other cases race and gender play a role. It is obvious that even though it is proclaimed that everyone has equal opportunities, this is not the case.
Then it comes to a moral question. How can one splurge on houses, cars and jewelry, if there are people (and children) who lose their jobs, houses, everything? I could not imagine wearing diamonds and gold, driving my $ 50000+ car, sleeping in a house that exceeds my needs tenfold and then seeing people begging for food and money. How can one enjoy a life in plenty, if there is this visible poverty? I am not saying that you should give it to anyone who is on the street begging, you cannot know if it will really help. Why not help fund programs that are successful? There is so much better you can do with money than spending it on goods which exceed one's primary needs. I believe that it would also make one as a donor much happier.
Why do people have so much money and others nothing? One main problem is that income is unequally distributed. Why should two people who work hard for 8 hours a day not make the same money? You might argue, that one invested more in her or his education, well let the person be compensated for that, but after paying back those expenses, make income equal. It would also give people more free choices when choosing a profession. People will chose based on what they enjoy and not what gives them the best social status and money.
Maybe this country is still too rich to really think about its poor. There needs to be a creation of true equality among the distribution of goods, because there is enough for everyone, some just take a bigger share and do not leave anything for the others.

clay

June 20, 2009 - 12:17 pm EDT

Oh, brother...

fatboyfanuci

June 20, 2009 - 12:53 pm EDT

What a bunch of red diaper, doper baby pablum. What a Commie. The very definition of one.

If everybody could just be happy and do what they want to do, who would clean up the trash, empty the colostomy bags of society, etc? Do you think people would actually choose to do that? This isn't Heaven and it's never going to be...And why are all these cities and states that are turning into dumps overwhelmingly controlled by Democrats?

lgrimestriad

June 20, 2009 - 2:19 pm EDT

I chose to be a therapeutic foster parent in an effort to make a difference and hopefully prevent young people from ending up homeless as adults. Unfortunately, sometimes the damage done to the kid is so great that it can not be turned around in just a short time. Also, as long as we continue to cut funding to programs that help these kids we will continue to add to this problem. Sometimes it does feel like I am emptying the colostomy bags of society and this is what I choose to do. I don't think this is heaven-never will be. However, people that are dealt a raw blow early in life do need help making up for it and as a person that is in a place to help I feel it is my responsibility to give back to society. I can tell you that all of the chronically homeless people I have ever known are dealing with some severe mental health issues.

jamesd.wilsonjr

June 20, 2009 - 2:34 pm EDT

This is for Charlie: Let me ask you if you ever fought in the Vietnam war or worked for the Gov't during the mid 50's through early 80's? I ask because your talk of the unfair distribution of income (refered to actually as "wealth") in America is the underlying principle of both Communism and Socialism in which the "state" owns all lands and distributes accordingly to the perceived notion of the "greater good". Is this a fair principle? No. It shall only benefit the poor individual, as the rich only get poorer and the middle class stay exactly the same. Are all men and women created equal? In the eyes of God perhaps, but I can't dunk a basketball, nor sew, nor perform quantum mechanics, but I have a very analytical mind and can perform many mathematical formulas and apply them through economic models. So, therefore, why should my $40,000 investment in my education net me no more income than a person with little to zero job skills or desire to work other than to earn the same pay as I would for the same 8 hours of work? We aren't talking about the same 8 hours of work either between the two. The capitalist world works by using the principles of economics first "created" by Adam Smith in the late 18th century. People overall are inherently good. Marktets will feel the use of the "invisible hand" and meet at the natural rate of equilibrium of supply and demand so that "all are better off" , both producers and consumers. Later economists devised that employers must incentivize workers to perform more hazardous or stressful work. This additional wage actually lowers the cost of safety devices installed for by employers employers and fairly compensates the employees for the additional risks involved in the labor. These same principles also apply to law today as well. Fairly estimating values and harm amounts to fairly and economically compensate plaintiffs for unlawful actions carried out by the defendents allows for the most socially efficient outcome. Your arguement for equal pay for equal TIME does not = equal pay for equal WORK.

ollie

June 20, 2009 - 4:09 pm EDT

Instead of relying on the government to "even the playing field", why are those who are abundantly fortunate not compelled to contribute to the basic well-being of the very unfortunate? You gripe about socialism and communism, but are you even looking at these words? "Society" and "Community" are at the root. The self-centered notion of making your society start at a particular income level or cost of education STILL would not isolate you from homelessness and poverty. Incomes can be lost in a flash, and education spares no one from mental illness. No one is asking you to give up your riches, but if you have $100 to buy yourself lunch then basic compassion and the goodness of mankind should COMPEL you to offer $5, $10, even $1.50 (not $50) to help feed the man who is digging in the dumpster for food? If not, then eventually the government will do it for you. The face of homelessness in this economy is no longer alcoholics or antisocial "characters" who just can't handle the picket fence, but good people who eventually lost everything because of someone else's greed. Someday, it could be you.

Theo

June 21, 2009 - 7:17 pm EDT

Charlie, you are talking about Socialism!!! If you want Socialism, you can move to a number of Socialist Countries!! The United States is getting more Socialist every day but thankfully we are still a Country based on Capitalism. You don't see many people flocking to a Socialist Country but they do seem to flock to our County.

windowthrough

July 13, 2009 - 11:08 am EDT

"Cover my own" is a belief system. " Love your neighbor as yourself, is another belief system." What does it take to make a neighbor your own? Is it a catastrophe where you and your neighbor must help each other to survive? Might it be having the foresight to realize your own survival depends on how well your neighbor is making it because the domino might fall your way? Sharing can be selfish or unselfish... the effect is the same. Well-being for another. It appears their is enough goodness going around that people with closed hands can remain closed. A person well give when compelled. "Cover my own" people need not worry. Let others give freely with motivation of their own. There well always be someone to give an open hand when needed, by the way. Your playground is yours. There is no concern about the unfortunate receiving happiness or contentment from you. Relax, all of us are in the same world, but not of the same mind. Remember, the mindset "Cover your own". Do people with the mindset "Do to others as you would have them do to you" really have to defend giving? Each person to his/her own playground.

SusanBAnthony

June 20, 2009 - 4:29 pm EDT

I read in the LA Times recently that that city has opened apartments for the homeless: it's a motel-like building, with rooms about the size of motel rooms, a bathroom, a kitchenette, seating, tv. The formerly homeless person has his own key and his own home to live in as he/she chooses, no strings attached. I think that's a good idea. If a person chooses to be homeless, that's one thing, but otherwise, everyone should have the key to his/her own place.

JParker

June 20, 2009 - 6:48 pm EDT

It always makes me laugh when people go on and on about how the homeless 'choose' this lifestyle. Owing to the deinstitutionalization in the 1980s of the mental health care system in this country, countless thousands of mentally ill people were turned out onto the streets and have remained there ever since, without adequate resources to integrate them into society or care for those who are unable to reintegrate.

"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me."

I remember reading that somewhere. Probably not that important to some of you, though.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: CLOUDY
  • Current Temperature: 52°
  • UV Idx: 1
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 60° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search