news-record.com

NEWS

House members consider raising many state taxes

Tuesday, June 9, 2009
(Updated 11:41 am)

RALEIGH — The state’s wealthiest residents would pay more income taxes and all of us would pay more sales tax under an approximately $940 million revenue proposal House members will consider today.

North Carolina has at least a $4 billion gap between the money it would raise without increasing taxes and the money it would need to continue the state budget as it is.

So far, House members have tried to bridge that gap by cutting spending in public schools, universities, health and human service programs and virtually every other aspect of state government. Some of those cuts have caused an outcry by those who rely on government services to be reduced or cut out entirely.

Democrats, who control the House, met behind closed doors Monday. In that meeting, some demanded the state raise some taxes to blunt the effect of cuts they said went too deep.

“We’re devastating people,” said Rep. Alma Adams, a Greensboro Democrat and one of the chief budget writers in the chamber. She and other budget writers say they have identified some spending items that would be restored if the full House were to agree to increasing taxes.

Examples of those restorations:

* Keeping class sizes in kindergarten through the third grades at current levels rather than increasing the number of students in a classroom.

* Keeping some mental health programs slated to be cut.

* Maintaining the amount paid to those who provide medical services to Medicaid patients.

But some Democrats are uncomfortable with raising taxes as the economy struggles to recover from recession. And almost to a person, Republicans are outspoken in their opposition to any new taxes.

“In a recession, this is not the time to be raising taxes on people who are hanging on by their fingernails trying to figure out how to put food on the table,” said Rep. Laura Wiley, a High Point Republican.

Gov. Bev Perdue and the Senate have already offered their versions of the budget that will take effect July 1. But those plans were written before results came in from April 15 tax collections, which showed that the economy was worse than expected. That left the House to propose the largest cuts and now to offer the first broad-based tax increases.

Among the major proposals outlined by budget writers Monday night:

* The sales tax would rise one-quarter of a percent. That would make it 7 percent in most places.

* Sales tax would be applied to more items, including warranties, installation of home appliances and repairs.

* Two new income tax brackets would be created. Currently, anyone making more than $100,000 is taxed at 7.75 percent. The proposal would tax those who earn between $200,000 and $500,000 at 8.25 percent. Those making more than $500,000 would be taxed at 8.5 percent.

* Cigarette taxes would be raised 25 cents to a total of 60 cents of state taxes per pack.

* Alcohol taxes and fees on dozens of government licenses and services would rise.

“It’s fair to say this revenue package has something just about every member (of the Democratic Caucus) likes to an extent and dislikes to an extent,” said Rep. Paul Luebke, a Durham Democrat and Finance Committee chairman.

Once the House finishes its work on the budget this week, a final compromise with the Senate and Perdue will be crafted.

Monday afternoon, Perdue urged legislators to consider tax increases rather than to achieve a balanced budget through cuts alone.

“With North Carolina facing an unprecedented budget shortfall, I call on House members to utilize a combination of spending reductions and new revenue in their budget,” Perdue said.
 

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Paul J

June 9, 2009 - 6:08 am EDT

Alma Adams is not capable of writing anything. She is an embarrassment to Guilford County.

Doug Johnson

June 9, 2009 - 7:38 am EDT

Wonder how the papers that endorsed the two pink elephants, that the state purchased last year, feel now.
Grandfathers Mountain and Chimney Rock.
I like to see a profit ,lost statement of these two after a year of operations.
Never will!
Maybe a story on Basnight Bed and Breakfast, paid for by our tax dollars! Not a chance.
Maybe even a story about how much the Duke case cost us, to buy votes for the Raleigh Mafia.
Pork over here, pork of there, pork, pork everywhere.
So we get taxed everywhere! Except for newspapers that support the Raleigh Mafia, in ever move they make.

Panacea

June 9, 2009 - 7:51 am EDT

Well, whatever true pork is in there, they are cutting too many vital services, and cutting too deep.

Taxes have to go up. They simply have to. They should have raised tobacco taxes the way they originally proposed.

So far, I don't see any tax proposal I dislike. They are all small measures that will spread the pain over every one.

ncb

June 9, 2009 - 8:18 am EDT

Please explain which vital services are being cut too deep. Specifics will do

Wilhammer

June 9, 2009 - 8:26 am EDT

Read much, ncb?, or do you think that no government services are needed? Really, cutting teachers, education and family support services, far more devastating to the people than taxing the rich, liquor and cigarettes.

Norm*

June 9, 2009 - 10:44 am EDT

No one likes to see waste or pay for it. However, at this stage Government delivers better value for the money than any business I currently buy from. No stockholders taking 10%, no high paid upper level administration making millions upon millions of dollars, No millions of dollars spent on marketing and the state doesn't take middle class jobs and "export" them to China. There may be waste, but it doesn't reduce the quality of the product quite the way the profit motive has cheapened everything in this country that we keep paying more for. (enjoy your 6 ounce yogurt, 12 oz packages of bacon, 1.5 quarts of ice cream and ground beef with "natural flavors added").

greywolf

June 9, 2009 - 10:50 am EDT

Good call by Adams and the state legislature. Taxes must increase in order for the state to serve the needs of the public. We can listen to the Libertarians and Republicans rant and whine that there should be no taxes and their position is understandable given their priorities which largely reflect those of the late Marie Antoinette: "let them eat cake." They will only be happy when they see the poor foraging in the forest for berries... No, wait! They'd then have then arrested and hanged for trespassing.

What has laissez-faire economics gotten us? Financial deregulation that allowed Wall Street to artificially run up oil prices while using mortgage derivatives to dynamite the economy. Business deregulation that allowed employers to pull up stakes and move millions of jobs overseas. All for the sake of making the rich richer at the expense of the common man. Shall I go on?

The tax increases proposed to offset the Bush-era economic cataclysm are modest. The income tax rates proposed for the new brackets should be far greater in order to yield revenue for the state to move beyond the modicum of services that it has provided in recent years.

dfayers

June 9, 2009 - 11:58 am EDT

Greywolf is right, we had an absentee government during the Bush years, and look what it got us into.

jbrewer

June 9, 2009 - 12:09 pm EDT

Remember that the North Carolina goverment during the "absentee" years was the Easley regime.

jbrewer

June 9, 2009 - 12:05 pm EDT

I don't care what political party you're a member of, both parties have a large stake in the economic turmoil in the state and the country. but neither of them will shouldere the responsibilty for their actions, and more importantly, take the responsibilty to correct the problem.

Neither a state, or a nation , can tax it's way to prosperity. Neither party can let go of the "pork", or the "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" mentality.

But Thomas Jefferson did say: "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."

thestatelottery

June 9, 2009 - 4:27 pm EDT

Instead of taxing the poor, as usual, with these stupid "sin" taxes we should be taxing the well to do directly. They always get out of paying their fair share since they don't "use these services." It's about time for them to step up. I know I'm ready to pay a little more in taxes if they would actually benefit people who need social services. I don't make a lot, but I'm not poor either.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search