news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

House tax package would raise $940M more

Monday, June 8, 2009
(Updated 9:43 pm)

RALEIGH (AP) — House Democrats moved forward on a North Carolina state budget proposal Monday night by announcing a proposed $940 million tax package for next year that would raise rates for sales and income taxes, cigarettes and alcohol.

The tax deal, debated behind closed doors in the Democrats' caucus for nearly two hours, also would expand the number of services that would be subject to sales tax.

But they weren't unified about the package.

Some liberal Democrats wanted more revenues to remove the most painful cuts used to narrow an unprecedented $4 billion-plus budget gap. Others in tobacco-growing regions were unhappy were with a 25-cent-per-pack increase on the cigarette tax on top of a 62-cent increase by Congress earlier this year.

The chief architect of the tax plan acknowledged the deal wasn't a slam dunk to cull together the 61 Democrats needed to help pass the budget bill, hopefully by week's end. Democrats have a 68-52 advantage in the chamber, and it's unlikely that any Republicans would vote for a spending plan that requires new taxes.

"Our thinking is one day at a time," said Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham, senior co-chairman of the House told reporters. "The revenue package has some things that just about every member likes to an extent and every member dislikes to an extent."

The plan would change the sales tax rate most people pay from 6.75 percent to 7 percent, while two new income tax brackets would be created for the state's highest wage earners — those making at least $200,000. The state cigarette tax also would go up to 60 cents a pack.

The Senate's budget approved in April also proposed raising taxes by $500 million, but the measure didn't provide details on how that would be reached.

Senate Democrats later in the month unveiled a proposal that would have reduced sales and income tax rates in exchange for expanding the number of services covered by the sales tax more so than the House. Cigarette and alcohol taxes also would be raised. But the package hasn't been approved by the chamber.

Once the House passes a budget bill, Democratic negotiators from both chambers will work toward a compromise to present to Gov. Beverly Perdue, who urged House members earlier Monday to support new taxes to balance the budget.

"With North Carolina facing an unprecedented budget shortfall, I call on House members to utilize a combination of spending reductions and new revenue in their budget," she said in a prepared statement.

Luebke said the money would be used to reduce some proposed cuts in education and health care, such as increasing class sizes in the public schools and restoring some proposed rate cuts for doctors and hospitals that treat Medicaid patients.

"Revenue raised in this package directly links to restoration of certain programs in education and health and human services," Luebke said.

The House Finance Committee will consider the tax package Tuesday morning about the same time the chamber's chief budget-writing committee considers a $17.8 billion spending package.

If the finance committee approves the package, the amount of the budget will be increased, said Rep. Mickey Michaux, D-Durham, senior co-chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

"If we can restore these cuts ... that will at least help a lot," Michaux said. Some of the extra funds would be set aside in the state's rainy-day reserve fund, which will be empty otherwise.

House Minority Leader Paul Stam, R-Wake, said Democrats wouldn't have to see new taxes if they had prioritized spending and eliminate more ineffective programs.

"I'd be surprised if there are any (Republican) votes for it," Stam said.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

dfayers

June 8, 2009 - 9:56 pm EDT

House Republicans want to sit idly by and watch our education system go down the tubes. They'd rather offset the budget by cutting teacher positions than matching revenue to state responsibilities. People making a quarter million dollars can pay a little more in taxes. I don't make nearly that much, but I could pay more as well if it means keeping teachers in classrooms. They talk about cutting programs, but notice they aren't naming specific programs. It's the same rhetoric the Bush White House relied on...and they generated a horrible deficit.

Theo

June 8, 2009 - 11:05 pm EDT

What? Democrats have a 68-52 advantage in the chamber. Which party is in charge? The entitlement party must now be accountable for their own actions!

Illiterati

June 8, 2009 - 11:39 pm EDT

Look, don't go giving away your hard-earned dollars on the prayer of government using it the way you think is best. Don't even say you're willing to pay more in taxes for anything. Once you say it, they'll take it and do whatever nonsense they want with it. No more money from us until the government proves they can responsibly manage what they're already stealing from us! (Not like I have any choice but to fork over more of my pennies for BS promises and backroom deals, but it feels good to say NO!)

I'm so frustrated by this constantly rising taxation after working day after long day just to make ends meet. Can't a taxpayer ever get a break? What's the point?

Wally43

June 9, 2009 - 12:01 am EDT

Increase the proposed taxes per this article if it will save teacher's jobs, enhance the education of future tax payers, and protect the most vulnerable in our society by providing them the needed health care services.

edward0275

June 9, 2009 - 12:56 am EDT

dfayers, I don't know you but you have your "head stuck in the sand" like Bev Perdue. "Our thinking is one day at a time". Where are you Pat McCroy? (Down the Obama drain, sad to say). .."Gov. Beverly Perdue, who urged House members earlier Monday to support NEW taxes...". Read the article, you D.S.! Given Obama's new "cap and trade" scheme, which will cost average American household $1600 more per year, and the fact that gasoline has gone up 75 cents per gallon in the last 40 days, I'm really in no mood mood to support her new state taxes. We all know that the President controls gas prices (check out some blogs from 1 year ago). You said "I don't make that much". Well you'd better start making a lot more! I'm glad that you "could pay more", because you sure as hell will be paying more. My guess is that you can't even pay your share of GM (Government Motors). This country will not survive with a rookie Senator community organizer as President. And as for Bev. Perdue, "Where are you, Pat McCroy?".

dfayers

June 9, 2009 - 10:53 am EDT

Edward,
1. No, we don't know that the president controls oil prices. OPEC has the monopoly on oil.
2. State taxes and federal taxes are two different things. States cannot run a deficit. The federal government can.
3. School children are the future of our democracy. We cannot push our deficit on them by letting their education go up in smoke.
4. Unless you make nearly a quarter million dollars (maybe you do) you won't see a significant increase, based on the progressive tax scheme. I don't understand why working class people support the rights of the wealthy to push tax burdens on us. If there is not progressive tax plan, community colleges will turn people away, and the people they do help will have to pay more. Meanwhile, the wealthy spend nearly $50,000 a year to send their kids to Duke.
5. You think you can do more with your money than government? Try building a highway from Asheville to New Bern. Do that with your own money. Most of us couldn't even build a road to the nearest grocery store. Or maybe you should hire your own security firm to control crime. Maybe you should pay for your doctor's education. The civil engineers who design our bridges and infrastructure, maybe you should pay their education directly so they can build you a bridge. The point is that education is critical, whether you are a student or not. The state has a responsibility to maintain safe viable infrastructure. If you use it, you gotta pay.
No more dine-and-dash citizens.

Theo

June 9, 2009 - 11:50 pm EDT

Dfayers, Maybe it's time to re-think our entire education process. The government has been failing our kids for years and it's time for an overhaul!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: CLOUDY
  • Current Temperature: 50°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 59° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search