news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Giving up these jobs doesn't affect wallet

Saturday, June 6, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

According to Economics 101, workers should be paid for jobs they perform -- nothing more, nothing less.

Unfortunately for taxpayers, notable and costly exceptions exist, particularly in the halls of higher learning.

Earlier this year, it came to light that Stanley Battle, who resigned in February as the N.C. A&T chancellor, will stay on as a professor and for six months draw his old salary.

And this week The News & Observer of Raleigh reports that former N.C. State provost Larry Nielsen, who resigned as chief academic officer as part of the fallout over the Mary Easley job flap, will get an equally sweet deal.

Both Battle and Nielsen eventually will resume teaching at their respective schools. However, in the lengthy interims they will be compensated handsomely at their current salary levels.

That may prove costly. During a "research leave," Battle will be paid in accordance with his chancellor's contract of $273,156 annually. While Nielsen takes a "study leave," he will continue to collect his annual salary of $298,700.

As for Battle, the university has said he will return to the School of Sociology and Social Work at a "level normal for his discipline." Nielsen, an expert on fisheries, reportedly will rejoin N.C. State's Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources faculty in November and teach one class per semester starting in January. His salary will then be reduced to $156,000.

Granted, state contracts cover their pay should circumstances change. But given formidable budget woes, several legislators correctly want to re-examine how much university employees should be paid while on leave. And N.C. State Board of Trustees Chairman Bob Jordan rightly has asked for a review of Nielsen's deal.

The issue surfaces as state-funded colleges prepare to grapple with unprecedented cuts. In March, A&T announced the elimination of 66 positions, 42 on the faculty. N.C. State faces a possible 10 percent budget loss. Even in better times, compensating highly paid officials for a job they no longer perform just doesn't add up, especially when they voluntarily step aside.

Now that employees are facing layoffs and pay cuts, and tuitions are rising at state schools, special salary allowances and considerations send the wrong message. The General Assembly needs to look closely at both leave and interim compensation policies.

COMING SUNDAY IN IDEAS • Social capital helps High Point trump Las Vegas. • Thoroughly investigate police shootings. • Battle's Cosby Kids program never got started.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

igliigli

June 6, 2009 - 6:49 am EDT

The News-Record is being hypocritical by complaining about Dr. Battle and Dr. Neilsen,
yet saying nothing about the multi-MILLION dollar salaries the UNC System coaches
continue to draw after being fired. College sports are where the real taxpayer rip-offs
are found.

question4u

June 9, 2009 - 12:09 pm EDT

igliigli: In response to your coment that "College sports are where the real taxpayer rip-offs are found" referring to the UNC System coaches' post-employment compensation, .. The real question is where does this money come from? I don't know about NC, but there was a USA Today article (by Upton and Wieberg) recently that looked at where the money comes from at 35 of the largest schools . The research showed 33% from TV and Radio, 25% Base Salary, 19% from apparrel and other endorsements, and 23% from deferred payments, annuities, and speaker fees. My question is: How much of the coaches' pay comes from our tax dollars? and consequently .. Is that specific amount within reason? I personally don't care about money they make from the value they create on their own in the free market.

DaveW

June 13, 2009 - 8:48 pm EDT

That one is too chicken droppings to debate you.

Get A Clue

June 6, 2009 - 7:43 am EDT

You don't work, you don't get paid.
If that a difficult concept for anyone in charge to grasp?

Panacea

June 6, 2009 - 9:38 am EDT

Apparently your brains soften once you go into administration. Too much Hulu I guess.

triadwatch

June 6, 2009 - 9:43 am EDT

you said this"Nielsen, an expert on fisheries, reportedly will rejoin N.C. State's Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources faculty in November and teach one class per semester starting in January. His salary will then be reduced to $156,000."

So we as taxpayers are paying this professor $156,000 for teaching one class, nice and you wonder why we are in this situation in the state house when we have professors teaching one class at a salary of $156,000.

Panacea

June 6, 2009 - 12:49 pm EDT

triad, I can tell you I don't make anywhere near that for teaching my one class--and my class is 10 credit hours, not the usual 3 or 4 for most college courses.

But yeah, when you have golden parachutes in academia it really makes you wonder why the budget is such a mess.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search