news-record.com

NEWS

Banking commission paid $500,000 in bonuses last year

Thursday, May 28, 2009
(Updated 7:58 am)

RALEIGH — The North Carolina Banking Commission paid $478,081 in bonuses to 72 employees last year and wants to set aside funds for another round this year.

The bonuses and potential bonuses have drawn the attention of legislators, who are trying to bridge a $4 billion budget shortfall.

“It’s hard to justify when we’re cutting salaries for some state employees and furloughing others,” said Rep. Pricey Harrison, a Greensboro Democrat who heads the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the commission.

Most state workers are subject to tightly drawn wage rules, but in 2005 the General Assembly exempted the Commissioner of Banks and his employees from the State Personnel Act.

“The banking commission has been involved in a project over the past several years to find and attract people to do the important work of banking regulation,” said Mark Pearce, the state’s Deputy Banking Commissioner.

The nearly $500,000 in bonuses were issued in August and were the first for the agency, Pearce said. Pearce received a $12,088 bonus under the program. His boss, Banking Commissioner Joseph Smith, did not receive a bonus and is not eligible for one, Pearce said.

The Office of the Commissioner of Banks, which is overseen by the North Carolina Banking Commission, is responsible for regulating state-chartered banks as well as other kinds of financial institutions such as mortgage brokers and check-cashing businesses.

The agency is funded with fees paid by banks and other institutions that are regulated, not by taxpayer dollars. The money collected is public money, and its employees are state workers.

Pearce said the commission competes for employees with private-sector employers and federal regulators, who pay more. The bonus program, he said, was a way to keep talented workers and give those workers an incentive to meet and exceed goals.

Bonuses could be issued, Pearce said, based on certain benchmarks. In one example he gave, a division that received more than 80 percent positive feedback from the people it was regulating would be eligible. In another, workers responding to consumer complaints more quickly than the time typically allotted would be rewarded.

Pearce said that it wasn’t clear in August, when the first round of bonuses was paid, that the state would face the kind of crisis that has forced agencies to cut back. Those woes are forcing Gov. Bev Perdue to cut salaries for state workers by way of furlough and budget writers to consider ways to shrink the size of state government, including use of layoffs.

The commission was scheduled to issue another round of bonuses in February, Pearce said, but did not make those payments in response to the ongoing crisis. And it has asked that $200,000 of its budget be set aside next year for potential bonus payments, although Pearce said it was possible those payments wouldn’t be made.

Harrison noted that by August financial giant Bear Stearns had collapsed and the banking sector was facing huge challenges. In July, Indymac bank became the fourth-largest bank failure in U.S. history and President Bush had signed a law to provide $300 billion in backing to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

“Folks who were involved in the financial sector were well aware of the problems,” Harrison said. “Given the talent they have over there (at the banking commission) they should have been aware of this impending crisis.”

Harrison said that budget writers plan to enact provisions that would prohibit agencies like the banking commission from issuing bonuses during the next two fiscal years, which begin July 1.

Sen. Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, said the commission and its leadership had a fairly good reputation.

“I have not heard any complaints by the regulated community or the community at large that Joe Smith or the commission is not going a good job,” Berger said. “The perception I have is that (they are) well-regarded all around.”

Still, he said, the idea of issuing bonuses during such trying economic times doesn’t look good, he said.

“Those agencies that are part of the state government but have independent funding sources ... should be sensitive to the perception that a bonus plan would create,” Berger said.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

BANKING COMMISSION BONUSES

The N.C. Banking Commission paid $478,081 in performance bonuses last year. The top recipients:

Mark Pearce, deputy commissioner

Base salary: $120,883

Bonus payment: $12,088

Ray Grace, program manager

Base salary: $107,715

Bonus payment: $10,772

Patrick Brennan, financial examiner

Base salary: $102,750

Bonus payment: $10,275

Wilber Loftin, financial examiner

Base salary: $102,750

Bonus payment: $10,275

Charlie Fields, program manager

Base salary: $98,311

Bonus payment: $9,831

Daniel Garner, attorney

Base salary: $98,073

Bonus payment: $9,807

Melanie Ford, program manager

Base salary: $97,659

Bonus payment: $9,766

Elizabeth Hammond, program manager

Base salary: $96,944

Bonus payment: $9,694

Stephen Williams, financial examiner

Base salary: $95,451

Bonus payment: $9,545

Mary Kane, financial examiner

Base salary: $94,789

Bonus payment: $9,479

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

rmacz

May 27, 2009 - 8:29 pm EDT

In paragraph #8, how can the money not be tax payer money and then be public money? This sounds a little fishy.

ncb

May 27, 2009 - 8:32 pm EDT

I guess the N&R are looking for the typical cavemanesque populist reaction of outrage. Sad

Protzman

May 28, 2009 - 7:48 am EDT

It's not entirely clear why getting high ratings from those being regulated would be a plus in most cases. One might argue the opposite would be more effective.

yourroots

May 28, 2009 - 9:19 am EDT

These bonuses are not paid with tax payer funds. I don't see a problem. They are creating a sound work environment for their staff and providing competitive salaries. From my understanding NC has some of the best banks in the nation. There must be a reason. Maybe a sound and stable regulatory commission?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search