news-record.com

NEWS

Black colleges fret over plan to aid students directly

Wednesday, May 13, 2009
(Updated 10:57 am)

President Barack Obama’s proposed education budget is worrying students and leaders at the city’s historically black colleges.

At issue: a federal program that provided an extra $85 million to black institutions for each of the past two years.

The new proposed budget would not continue that funding, shifting aid primarily to students instead of directly to the schools. Even with increases in other funding, historically black colleges and universities, or HBCUs, stand to lose $73 million in funding.

That’s money the schools said they can’t afford to lose.

“Any cut to the HBCU movement would really hurt, especially at this moment,” said Franklin McCain , chairman of N.C. A&T’s board of trustees. “Right now, in this economy, we’re struggling to do the little that we can do. We’re making cuts everywhere we can. To lose this funding as well would really end up hurting people.”

Officials at Bennett College , which has struggled with financial problems for years, could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

A&T has had its own financial difficulties and, as a UNC system school, has seen deep cuts to its budget as the state’s financial crisis continues.

Education department officials said the two-year program was always meant to be temporary and that HBCUs shouldn’t have planned for it to go on forever. But McCain and other leaders said the funding was a good start at correcting the traditional underfunding with which black colleges have struggled for years.

“The truth is that more of our students come from meager backgrounds than majority or traditionally white colleges,” McCain said. “We don’t have the great number of alumni who can make contributions of a quarter million dollars up to five or six millions dollars. That government funding, that aid, is really essential to us continuing to give people a chance who might not otherwise have one.”

HBCUs make up 3 percent of all U.S. colleges, but they account for 20 percent of undergraduate degrees awarded to black students, according to the United Negro College Fund. Of the 105 federally recognized HBCUs, 10 are in North Carolina — five public and five private.

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, a Republican from Winston-Salem, called the proposed cuts to those schools “devastating.”

“This primary HBCU program provides the critical, foundational support necessary to ensure that HBCUs can best serve their students,” Burr said.

Cutting HBCU funding while continuing to fund things such as historic whaling museums calls the president’s priorities into question, Burr said.

Education department officials said they aren’t cutting funding so much as shifting it to support minority students rather than minority institutions.

They point to the maximum Pell Grant for low-income students going up by $200 to $5,550 .

That could help HBCUs very little, according to an Associated Press analysis. Even if all 132,000 HBCU students receiving Pell grants get the maximum $200 increase, historically black schools will see only about a third of the funding that would be cut from the new budget.

The Obama administration should be applauded for concentrating on student aid, but it shouldn’t forget direct aid to institutions, said Marcus Bass, president of A&T’s student government association.

“Anything you can do to help students afford school is a good thing,” Bass said. “But the institutions need to keep their doors open, need to invest in the future, need to continue to grow and become better in order for us to educate everyone who wants to go to college. That’s the mission.”

 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

Contact Joe Killian at 373-7023 or joe.killian@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

About the proposal

The Obama administration is proposing a budget that doesn’t renew a two-year program that provided $85 million in direct funding to HBCUs in each of the past two years.

The administration said the funding was temporary and wants to provide funding in other ways. Money will be provided directly to minority students rather than to the schools.

Even when offset by increases in other funding, the schools would essentially take a $73 million cut.

 

The schools' stance

The schools argue that with the economy in such bad shape, they can’t afford to lose this funding.

They argue point out that HBCUs make up only 3 percent of U.S. colleges but account for 20 percent of undergraduate degrees awarded to black students.
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

JoeScott

May 13, 2009 - 8:13 am EDT

A&T's recent money related scandals coupled with their unwillingness to disclose, discuss, or confront these fiascos in public leads me to think that the idea of increasing direct financial aid to students as opposed to A&T is wise. After all, the federal, state, and endowment monies that were siphoned by A&T officials over the years were intended to help the students in the first place. At least now the students will have greater control over how the money will be spent.

A bottom-up idea like this puts all colleges in a precarious position: They'll have to work harder at becoming the types of institutions students WANT to attend. Otherwise, students will take their enrollment - and newly increased aid money - elsewhere. One way to court students' interest is to publicly confront and out school officials who waste their money.

The next thing I would like to see is accountability for student aid dollars. If a student takes a grant and makes bad grades or drops out, those grants should be transformed into loans. Also, if a student on loans makes good grades and graduates, his or her loans should be forgiven or reduced by the grant money from students who didn't do their homework.

Chance

May 13, 2009 - 8:34 am EDT

You pretty much hit the nail on the head with all those points...well said.

Panacea

May 13, 2009 - 10:12 am EDT

I disagree with your suggestion of turning grants into loans if students are unsuccessful. This penalizes students in an unproductive way. First of all, they've already been unsuccessful. If the grant turns into a loan, they have little incentive to try again or try harder. If they don't get the degree they can't pay the loan back, and it just turns into a bad loan.

It's a grant. It's supposed to be a gift, not a loan.

Some students lose grant money or scholarships through no fault of their own. In many community colleges, to get a B you have to earn an 86%, while at 4 year schools you have to get an 80%. Many of my nursing students lose scholarship money because they earn an 85% in my very tough course, but I have to give them a C instead of a B because that's college policy.

I do agree that HBCU's need to not be reliant on federal dollars. The point of HBCU's was to give black students a place to go to college. They have other options today. I'm not saying the need for them has gone away. I am saying, other doors have opened. If HBCU's want to stay open, they need to become relevant to the landscape, and become more inclusive. They should actively recruit students of all races and backgrounds and promote diversity on their campuses. They don't seem interested in doing that. So they struggle.

JoeScott

May 13, 2009 - 10:21 am EDT

Panacea,

Having attended a community college for two years, I have witnessed many students waste grant money by ditching classes, dropping out mid-semester, and simply by making no effort whatsoever. These aren't sob story cases so much as individuals who made a conscious decision to waste time and money by loafing on the public's dime.

I was not referring to students who make C's, but the ones who make D's, F's - or worse, I's (for "imcomplete") - because they made no attempt to fulfill their basic requirements.

Yes a grant is a gift, but when it's wasted, it's the tax payer who picks up the tab. By encouraging accountability, it will reduce such needless waste and motivate grant recipients to try and take their responsibilities as students and future career paths seriously. I see nothing but encouragement to try in a situation like this.

JoeScott

May 13, 2009 - 10:34 am EDT

And if a student really did try and still made a D or an F - something I've never seen before - they can appeal. I am sure a teacher would be willing to speak on his or her behalf.

thestatelottery

May 13, 2009 - 10:40 am EDT

Franklin McCain's quote are dead on point. P.S. I'm white.

Beachwalk

May 13, 2009 - 10:52 am EDT

HBCU, UNCF, NAACP, BET, Rainbow Push Coalition, National Association of Black Hotel Owners, Operators and Developers (NABHOOD), African American Planning Commission (AAPC), Black Culinarians Alliance (BCA), National Association of Black Accountants (NABA), National Association of Blacks In Criminal Justice (NABCJ)
, Blacks In Government (BIG), Black Wall Street Merchants Association, National Black Child Development Institute (NBCDI), Black Women In Sisterhood For Action (BISA), National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Miss Black USA, National Action Council For Minorities in Engineering (NACME), etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,

HOW MUCH MORE OF A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD DO AFRICAN AMERICANS NEED?
Maybe these organizations are not designed as much to raise up African Americans but they are designed to tear down Whites and to divide.

JoeScott

May 13, 2009 - 11:08 am EDT

Beach, you are a clown who took this conversation to a place it doesn't need to be. This argument has more to do with bottom-up vs. top-down stimulus from the government than anything else, including race.

If we learned nothing from the second Bush administration, it's that we very seldom help a lot of people by giving the money to the wealthy and established in the hopes that some of it will trickle down towards the people on the bottom.

The point of this revised policy is to help students THEN institutions as opposed to the other way around. And while this policy will in fact help a lot of black students (and white ones, too), it has little if anything to do with race.

Beachwalk

May 13, 2009 - 1:13 pm EDT

It was not me who first brought up "race".
Phrases taken directly from the article:
"historically BLACK colleges and universities, or HBCUs"
"a federal program that provided an extra $85 million to BLACK institutions"
"our students come from meager backgrounds than majority or traditionally WHITE colleges"
"HBCUs make up 3 percent of all U.S. colleges, but they account for 20 percent of undergraduate degrees awarded to BLACK students"
"according to the United NEGRO College Fund"

Don't tell me I was the one to first bring up race.
It appears some want a color blind society ONLY when it benefits themselves.

madTGrad

May 13, 2009 - 8:24 pm EDT

You are truly ignorant. You cannot believe that the groups and/or initiatives you named level the playing field for African-Americans. African-Americans endured 400 years of slavery, the playing field will never be level. Can you say Holocaust....?

You are using this conversaation to express your obvious racist beliefs. Are you afraid that funding HBCU's will create more opportunities for African-Americans to get a chance at your American dream?

Are you also against providing benefits for the only real Americans-Native Americans? Are you also over the holocaust?
You are on the wrong blob. Find another place to share your opinion.
Listen, the bottom line is this.... you had better adjust your attitude, because you are the new minority.

Beachwalk

May 13, 2009 - 9:05 pm EDT

Thank you for reaffirming what I said. You prove that some want a colorblind society ONLY when it benefits themselves. You are obviously one of those people.

I was not the first to mention race and you have the gall to say I am racist. You are an idiot.

And as far as "you had better adjust your attitude", I am not easily intimidated.

frustrated

May 13, 2009 - 12:45 pm EDT

Take a look at A&T Chancellor sanitizing his hands before shaking students hands during the Spring 2009 Commencement that is advertized on www.ncat.edu. Doesn't this remind you of the slave days when people were afraid to shake or touch an African American hands because they thought they were dirty and they would catch a disease? If this is the treatment Afican Americans students receive during an event that is made available to the public how do you think his Administration treats students, staff and faculty behind closed doors??? This is unbelievable!!!!

I personally have a problem with the federal funds being taken from the HBCU's that by the way was incorporated by the Bush Administration; however, it is a bigger problem when HBCU Administrator and District Attorneys refuse to hold Administrator accountable for their actions (for example: misuse of funds, misuse of personnel, workplace harrassment, retailiation). If the State Audiors have thoroughly investigated and identified wrong doings by Administrators who is a local District Attorney and A&T Administrators allowed to override the State Auditors investigation. This is an embarrassment to persons that have graduated from HBCU's and the African American Community.

It is also an embarrassment for McCain and Battle to try to convince the public that Battle resigned. It is obvious that if an employee resigns the employer is not liable to pay the employee for the rest of the contract; however, if he quits the employee is obligated to fulfull the contract. Middle and/or High school students learn this in Business Law.

A&T has been laying off employees and issuing furloughs for the last year which would be fine, if Administration wasn't still paying Sungard Consultants over $200.00 an hour and temporary employees. According legislative policy a Reduction-In-Force should not take place as long as temporary employees and Consultants have been relieved of their duties.

Chancellor Battle, Vice Chancellor of IT and the Vice Chancellor of HR have failed to resolve any personnel or technical issues that were identified by Erskin Bowles and Lylod Hackley 3 years ago in the Audit which has really affected A&T's students, staff, alumni and faculty moral. A&T currently has the lowest enrollment rate among the 16 Universities.

I realize that there will be a lot of people that say that A&T should not air its dirty laundry and some alumni will be really upset because they just want people to be quite, but this is what has caused the employee and technical issues at A&T to get way out of control compare it to what is happening with the current economic situation in the United State. Wake up people we are gradually losing the largest HBCU in North Carolina. Once we lose A&T believe me their is a plan to get the other HBCU's in place. Did anyone notice that General Administration replaced all Chancellor's at HBCU's only?

Stop for a minute and think about what the UNCG-A&T Gateway is really about! UNCG currently has taken over Nanoscience Engineering, now they are moving the data (IT Department) and next in Finance. Think alumni if they have the data, research money and manage the budget A&T is left with is Academic and a Football program. All they have did is used Gateway as a coverup and A&T Administrators got excited about a new building. Administrator are even thinking once they take over we will not need 2 IT Vice Chancellors, 2 Finance Vice Chancellor better yet 2 Chancellors. I ask for forgiveness if I am wrong but if the lovers of A&T do not unite we will see this happen within 2 years. Remember this article if alumin, student stand by and do nothing!!!

LAtoNC

May 14, 2009 - 1:45 am EDT

Battle sanitized his hands because of swine flu. Duh!

LAtoNC

May 14, 2009 - 2:04 am EDT

Battle sanitized his hands because of swine flu (he said it). A&T doesn't do much at all for the students, so if the money doesn't go straight to the school anymore, Amen to that. I HATE A&T with a friggin passion, it's a big party and I have been mislead the entire time I have been there. Last time I checked, Battle wasn't trying to convince anyone he's resigning, he won't even comment. Also, you actually DO have to continue to pay someone for the rest of the term if you're still under contract. A&T is a crook that pays off the D.A. so former chancellors won't get in trouble for stealing money (that's what I think happened). I actually work for the school and apparently the Chancellor is leaving because he is trying to improve the school academically and provide more scholarships for students...you know the money hungry staff at A&T doesn't want that! I mean come on, since when did A&T want to provide us students at the UNIVERSITY and actual EDUCATION??? There are a bunch of old heads that work there that are resistant to change and couldn't do anything with their life besides graduate from A&T and come back and work at A&T (the only people who'd hire them). The horrible staff will be the downfall of this university, I have felt that way the entire time I have attended. The moment I try to get something done that may take a couple dollars out of the staff's pocket, I catch hell.

P.S. I am an A&T student

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search