news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Foxx says Shepard murder was not a hate crime

Thursday, April 30, 2009
(Updated 11:00 am)

Comments by Rep. Virginia Foxx while debating a measure related to federal hate-crimes legislation Wednesday have angered members of the gay community.

Foxx referenced the October 1998 killing of Matthew Shepard, a University of Wyoming student who witnesses testified at trial was killed because he was gay.

“We know that young man was killed in the commitment of a robbery,” Foxx said on the floor of the House. “It wasn’t because he was gay. The bill was named for him, the hate-crimes bill was named for him, but it’s really a hoax that continues to be used as an excuse for passing these bills.”

Shepard’s killing became a rallying point for the gay rights community. Imagery connected with the slaying — Shepard was tied up, beaten and left for dead on a wooden fence — became an iconic rallying point for those pushing to include gays and lesbians in federal hate-crime protections.

Foxx was leading Republicans in debate connected to HR 1913, which would expand the number of crimes that would fall under federal hate-crime laws. The bill, which passed the House on a 249-175 vote, would add gays and lesbians to the categories of people protected under those laws.

Jim Neal, a one-time candidate for U.S. Senate who is gay, called Foxx’s statements “ignorant.”

“I’m baffled that any kind of elected representative would make that kind of absurd and heartless comment about a young man whose life was taken away from him, and taken away because he was gay,” Neal said.

A staffer for Foxx pointed to a report by the ABC program “20/20” that quoted a police detective as saying that drugs and money motivated the robbery-murder, not the fact that Shepard was gay.

News reports after the slaying indicated Shepard made a pass at one of the defendants. That man, Aaron McKinney, raised a “gay panic” defense at trial, saying he was so enraged because of traumatic boyhood experiences.

Foxx acknowledged using the word “hoax” might have been insensitive.

“The term 'hoax’ was a poor choice of words used in the discussion of the hate-crimes bill,” Foxx said in a statement Wednesday. “Mr. Shepard’s death was nothing less than a tragedy, and those responsible for his death certainly deserved the punishment they received.”

Still, the pushback against Foxx’s remarks continued. N.C. Democrats asked members to call the state Republican Party and challenge Foxx’s comments. Video spread across the Internet, and gay activists remained incensed.

“He was killed because he was gay and she is making light of that fact,” said Matt Comer, who grew up in Foxx’s Winston-Salem-based district and edits Q-Notes, a Charlotte-based publication geared toward a gay audience. “We shouldn’t forget why he died just like we shouldn’t forget why Hitler murdered Jews during World War II. It was hate.”

Foxx’s district is rated one of the nation’s more conservative.

“She’s not going to have any blow-back there,” Comer said. “More than likely, there will be a lot of people who agree with her.” Most of the outrage over her remarks, Comer said, would be limited to the gay community.

Contact Mark Binker at (919)832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx

MORE ONLINE

Follow the story at Mark Binker's Capital Beat blog

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

barbati

April 30, 2009 - 9:55 am EDT

Hmmm. Equal protection can't be served if local authorities cannot be relied on to vigorously prosecute a given crime because of the perpetrator's motivation. This was precisely the reason why it was necessary during the civil rights era to pass new laws giving the federal government jurisdiction over acts that were already crimes under state law. As we know the local authorities in the south frequently failed to vigorously enforce the state law where lynchings, bombings, etc, were motivated by race.

So if what you're after is equal protection under the laws, then it makes sense to extend federal jurisdiction to cover crimes that might otherwise go unprosecuted or underprosecuted.

BTW, this article is not about abortion.

ravencottage

April 30, 2009 - 8:35 pm EDT

BTW, these comments are about the hypocrisy of the usual suspects who are outraged, very outraged, really outraged, truly outraged, positively outraged and simply outraged. These folks could care less about Matthew. They are jumping on every moveon.org opportunity to attack a conservative. And those I find truly disgusting are the groups, local and national, who have exploited Matthew for fundraising.

Paul J

April 29, 2009 - 9:22 pm EDT

Foxx is an idiot that idiots keep re-electing. Wake up and throw all the bums out.

jeffrey63

April 29, 2009 - 9:54 pm EDT

1998 Bill Clinton the President. What a nice way to get the focus off of Bill and Monica then. Today April 29, 2009. Why are you folks wasting your time over such trivial stuff. Hate crimes happen everyday and have for ever. Do you need a history lesson about this ? Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Germans, African Americans. Have any of you writing these worthless comments ever been the victim of a crime ? If you have then you know that the person committing these crimes against other human being are filled with hate and in fact probably hate themselves. Hate Crime, was the guy not robbed ? Or was that just a cover up even before this Hate Crime Bill was put into place, wow! How did the criminals know that they would be in such big trouble even before the Bill was even heard of ?
Folks, this is a smear attempt against Mrs. Fox. I did not vote for Virginia, but I think if you really listen to what she said without the talking points from the media. You will see that she has a point. People, please just think for
yourselves !

mikesus

April 30, 2009 - 1:23 am EDT

The problem is that all they want is sound bites. Can't think for themselves and have to be spoon fed. I wonder how many folks jumped on this without even listening to it.

nfoste2245

April 30, 2009 - 4:35 pm EDT

Someone has been watching too much FoxNews.

tledford

April 30, 2009 - 8:01 pm EDT

"Folks, this is a smear attempt against Mrs. Fox."

You are wrong, sir. There is no need to smear her, as she smears herself every time she speaks. Sadly, however, she smears by extension all North Carolinians when she speaks, due to her office.

Thanks to the Lord, and praise to her, that Foxxx isn't my representative in Congress. (The triple "xxx" is due to the fact that Foxxx is far more obscene than *any* kind of pornography.)

sagan06

April 29, 2009 - 10:59 pm EDT

This woman is obviously delusional. Just look at that picture and tell me this is not one apple that fell a little bit to far from the tree.

Bruce1900

April 29, 2009 - 11:18 pm EDT

I am shocked at her comments. Are we as a state so bigoted that we allow people like this to remain in office? I suppose the next thing we will say is that Martin Luther King, Jr. was just a Negro at the wrong place at the wrong time or in Dr. Foxx's words "unfortunate." Or maybe the Holocaust never happened. When the president of Iran says that we want his head. The time has come for North Carolinians to rise up to the challenge and remove this moron from office. I am ashamed that she "represents" us.

tledford

April 30, 2009 - 8:14 pm EDT

We're getting better as a state, but we still have a way to go. Fortunately, people who think as Congresswoman Foxxx does are dying out, they're old and feeble-minded. In another ten years they'll *all be gone, thank God!*

SecretScoundrel

April 30, 2009 - 3:20 am EDT

There are so many ways for Virginia Foxx to oppose the legislation that was at hand but she only knows one way.... to hurt and to insult. I find it astounding that a "Christian" person could stand in front of the mother of a murder victim and say the things she said. Regardless of whether you agree or not with the particular legislation, you must agree that Foxx certainly will do anything and say anything for political gain. And to hell with any sense of what is right and civil.

tledford

April 30, 2009 - 8:16 pm EDT

Sadly, for some, perhaps many Christians, hate is what it's all about. I grew up among them and learned it in my teens in the '70s.

ncb

April 30, 2009 - 8:17 pm EDT

Oh, such drama!!!!

She never suggested that the one responsible isnt a murderer. Grow up and use some rational arguments rather than pure emotion

AnonAnon

April 30, 2009 - 5:38 am EDT

I don't agree with what Foxx said at all and I'm not going to defend her in the least. I wasn't even gonna comment on the stupidity of this until I got to Comer's statement.

“We shouldn’t forget why he died just like we shouldn’t forget why Hitler murdered Jews during World War II. It was hate.”

In a story about ignorant comments, it's ironic that they'd use an ignorant comment to debunk it. I'm Jewish and I find it offensive to compare a single murder to the same level of the sadistic murder of millions of my people.

Murder is Murder. I've yet to see a "love" based murder, so why is there such a thing as a "hate" murder. Lives are unfairly ended. You wanna send a message? Stiffen the penalty for murder. Increase death penalties. Do whatever you want, but don't try to make a separate category for cold blooded murder.

notoriousBLOG

April 30, 2009 - 9:38 am EDT

The surest most effective way to feel the "hate" is to disagree with the gays. They will turn on you like a bulldog that has tasted blood. Well, I to am outraged! I am outraged that the gays feel that it is necessary to try and destroy my way of life in order to justify their way of life. By being straight, white, male and Christian I will be branded with every hateful pseudonym that can be spewed from someones mouth. I don't hate anyone, but I also am not willing to cower to these people just because they "hate me for what I represent." They want to destroy the sanctity of marriage just to make their point. I couldn't care less if they have civil unions or whatever they want to call it but a marriage is between a man and a woman. Go and live your life in peace and quit trying to destroy what you don't agree with. There is an old saying in China, I don't remember the exact words, but in effect it states that if you continue to whip a caged bear it will eventually get it's revenge. White middle class Americans have been accused of every ill that has befallen this world and in talking to people I sense that the anger is rising to the top. We are tired of being beaten into the corner.

Waldo Leidecker

April 30, 2009 - 12:34 pm EDT

What time is the cross burning tonight?

bigwill

April 30, 2009 - 3:33 pm EDT

We can't have one tonight, I think we are still under a burning ban until further notice. Maybe after it rains they will lift the ban. Standby, we will let you know.

JoeScott

April 30, 2009 - 8:35 am EDT

First off, why is everyone who speaks against Foxx making it a point to say they are "straight"? It seems odd, and should have nothing to do with your opinion one way or the other.

As for the Matthew Shepard case, the whole circus around this reminds me of Cassie Bernall, the Christian girl who was killed in the Columbine Massacre. During the initial reports, when allegations spread that the two school shooters were specifically targeting Christian students, it was said that either Klebold or Harris had walked up to her, asked, "Do you believe in God?" and then shot her for saying yes. Cassie's mom Misty Bernall toured the country, spoke at churches and on various TV programs, and even wrote a book ("She Said Yes"), all of which exploited certain Christians' need to feel persecuted and under attack by a seemingly anti-Christian world. It was later found out that the Columbine shootings were not motivated by religion whatsoever, and that Klebold and Harris never asked anyone if they believed in God before shooting them. That this part of the story was later debunked doesn't make Cassie's murder - or the murder of the other 11 students and teacher - less of a tragedy.

I am glad that Foxx apologized for being insensitive. She was.

However, if she had said, "There's no concrete evidence that proves Matthew Shepard was even murdered because of his sexuality," that would be true, and there's no debate for that. Like the Cassie Bernall case, most of what people think they know about Shepard's killing was loose hearsay generated during the initial days of the investigation that was solidified by unchecked national media coverage.

But again, murder is horrible regardless of motive. The fact that Shepard was killed for any reason makes his death a tragedy. And the fact that he might have been killed for the stupid motive of securing money to buy crystal meth is even worse in some ways.

ncb

April 30, 2009 - 7:21 am EDT

Im a middle aged normal guy and think that she is absolutely correct. Look at the facts of the case. The only issue here is how many panties Foxx had put in a wad because of her comments. It makes people feel so much better about themselves to declare 'outrage' and the like.

JoeScott

April 30, 2009 - 9:45 am EDT

Again, what is "normal"? Why are people on both sides of the debate stating their age, sexual orientation, and normality before sharing their opinion on this issue? None of these things should be needed as qualifiers here.

ncb

April 30, 2009 - 8:16 pm EDT

Homoism is a genetic defect, thus heterosexuality is normal. Hope that helps

dalekm123

April 30, 2009 - 7:23 am EDT

Ms Foxx, you are a disgrace to the people of this great state. It's this limited belief that separates you from reality. My wife and I are disturbed that you represent NC. YOU are pathetic!

bigwill

April 30, 2009 - 8:29 am EDT

The only people "pathetic" about this article and comments are the people that can't look at the hard core facts about the crime. There is no evidence that this was a hate crime. People just assume that it was because he was gay. So what if he was brutally murdered, people are brutally murdered everyday. I know someone that was beaten with a hammer, paint cans. hung by his neck and then buried alive, only to find him dead later. There was never a question that his was a hate crime, because there was no evidence of such. It was for drugs and money which is the exact same here. Thats why our judicial system is so screwed up, because society has ruined it by always wanting to scream discrimination. Its always the easy way out and the quick way to get money from a lawsuit. The only ignorant people here are the ones that cant see past their own stubborn beliefs.

tledford

April 30, 2009 - 8:05 pm EDT

So why was one of the defendants' defense "gay panic?"

dalekm123

May 1, 2009 - 2:44 pm EDT

Still pathetic....now she is trying to back peddle and she digs the hole deeper. The best thing Ms Foxx could do would be to apologize, not a play on words as she is trying to do. Nut-it-up Ms Foxx and apologize.

Waldo Leidecker

April 30, 2009 - 8:40 am EDT

Representative (of WHAT I have NO idea!) Fox needs to contact her proctologist to arrange for a brain scan. She is nothing more than Hitler in drag.

tledford

April 30, 2009 - 8:06 pm EDT

Man, "Laura" is one fantastic film! I had no idea anyone commenting here would know the amazing character Clifton Webb portrayed in that film.

Cemetery

April 30, 2009 - 9:12 am EDT

I am appauled that someone who one would think should be smart is expressing such ignorance about the Matthew Shepard murder. It is clear that it was a hate crime based on the defense of the young men involved in the killing. They basically stated that they were freaked out by the fact that Matthew was gay and panicked. The prosecution pointed out that one of the killers pretended to be gay to get Matthew to go with them that night. Neither of the killers were on drugs and had to have purposely murdered this young man. In fact, Wikipedia states, "The beating was so severe that the only areas on Shepard's face that were not covered in blood were those where his tears had washed the blood stains away." That's not a robbery, that's HATE, Ms. Foxx.

JoeScott

April 30, 2009 - 9:37 am EDT

Wikipedia is hardly the source of truth on this case. Anyone can write, edit, and revise that entry, and it looks as if it were done so by a rather sentimental person with extreme poetic license. I do think Foxx should publicly apologize for using the word "hoax" in reference to this case.

On the same note, there is no definitive evidence nor credible witnesses that could link the gruesome killing to a hate crime -- not that it would even need to be a hate crime in order to be appalling or wrong.

Rick

April 30, 2009 - 9:15 am EDT

What an embarrassment to our state.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: PARTLY CLOUDY
  • Current Temperature: 56°
  • UV Idx: 1
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 58° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search