news-record.com

NEWS

N.C. Senate debates before first budget vote

Wednesday, April 8, 2009
(Updated 4:42 pm)

RALEIGH (AP) — The state Senate debated a trimmed-down budget for North Carolina government Wednesday that makes tough choices on public education and health care during the deep recession but leaves unanswered what taxes will be raised to balance the plan.

Democrats in charge of the chamber put the two-year spending plan on the Senate floor just three weeks after Democratic Gov. Beverly Perdue released her own budget, her first since taking office.

In its first year, which begins July 1, the plan would spend $20.05 billion and close a projected $3.4 billion budget gap by cutting expenses, spending $1.7 billion in federal stimulus money and increasing taxes by $500 million.

Senate budget leaders highlighted relatively small portions of money to expand health care coverage to more than 15,000 additional children, expand early college programs in high schools and work and prevent gang activity.

But the plan's recurring theme centered on cutting back. The budget would lay off 712 state workers and keep another 910 positions vacant, close four prisons and increase class sizes in the public school.

"We had the challenge of cutting across state government but knew we had to help those in need," said Sen. Charlie Albertson, D-Duplin, co-chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. "No one likes to make cuts but we have worked to minimize those cuts and keep our state on the right track. The working families of our state deserve that."

The tax plan hasn't been released in part because details haven't been finalized.

But that proposal likely will be contentious because Senate leaders have suggested raising cigarette and alcohol taxes — though not as much as Perdue wants — and possibly taxing some services for the first time.

"Stay tuned for more to come," said Sen. Dan Clodfelter, D-Mecklenburg, co-chairman of Senate Finance Committee.

Republicans have complained that leaving the tax details unclear is irresponsible and doesn't explain how the budget would be balanced, which is required by state law.

"We don't know what taxes we're talking about," Senate Minority Leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, said. "And yet we're being asked to vote on this budget."

The plan would reduce spending for K-12 schools more deeply than Perdue sought, shifting more money over to the community college and University of North Carolina system.

Perdue and the North Carolina Association of Educators oppose a change that would increase the average size of public school classrooms by two students through the 2010-11 school year, at a savings of $322 million annually.

The budget also would essentially phase out the More at Four program, which provides free, high-quality preschool to 32,000 at-risk 4-year-olds, and merge it with an initiative that sets ratings for child care programs.

Former Gov. Mike Easley, who championed the creation of More at Four during the previous eight years, said earlier Wednesday that he believes the award-winning initiative will be ultimately protected.

"At the end of the day the General Assembly will not do damage to North Carolina's pre-K program, ranked No. 1 in America and they'll stand up for North Carolina's children," Easley said in a prepared statement.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

mthale

April 8, 2009 - 11:44 pm EDT

I sure hope more people will stand up for North Carolina's children. I think this budget is foolish. I have to agree that I would not vote on a proposal if I didn't know which taxes are being involved. How can the NC representatives be doing their job if their not actively representing everyone’s needs? Maybe this article was just a little vague but from the given comments, the representatives are being far too vague, acting hasty & irresponsibly over something that is very significant to the state.
I am no more interested in raising taxes than any other citizen. But raising cigarette & alcohol taxes, even by a little will prove to be very effective. NC has the cheapest cigarettes in the nation. Like they say, you can't have your cake & eat it too.
However, I do not approve of budget cutting in areas such as K-12 education. This is an area already suffering to an embarrassing degree. If we dumb down our youth it won't matter how many colleges we equip with funding. How many of the UNC colleges are really hurting for money?? I'm not saying that the money isn’t well spent, but we should really take a close look at their budgets. As we all know, colleges are often equipped with ample sources to maintain their basic groundwork for education. (i.e. alumni foundations, tuition fees, private investors, etc.) So if we start cutting public schools, you are stopping our youth in their tracks. Public schools are in the need of a reform now. They do not have extra sources of income quite like a college does. In my experience—well over 15 years ago—elementary & middle school classrooms were overcrowded as it was. It was hard to function sometimes. To illustrate the point further, my neighbors’ children had to go to school in a gym. They put several classes into one room, while they waited for a new elementary school to be finished. How can that be an effective learning environment…how can anyone focus with several classes going on at once in the same room?? Now our resolve is to increase class size even more and lay off 90 teaching positions??? There are other alternatives that we need to consider that will not have consequences on our students or the integrity of education.

REFORM THE SYSTEM: another classic case of a govt. system that is long overdue a reform.

We can't afford to give our youth anything less than a quality education. The quick answers are not always the best. We need to really analyze every govt. position, every salary, every [unnecessary] bonus. Can we give up some luxuries? Can we?? Can we give up a small bit of benefits for the greater good?? Can we come together and propose a reasonable budget and outline all the details?? Can we support each other instead of picking one over another?? Can we analyze this realistically instead of with haste??? It is your job, NC representatives.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search