news-record.com

NEWS

U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan calls President Obama's budget deficits 'completely unsustainable'

Saturday, March 28, 2009
(Updated 7:22 pm)

— U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan said Saturday that the budget proposal pushed by President Barack Obama would burden the nation with an annual deficit of more than $1 trillion, a shortfall she deemed “completely unsustainable and unacceptable.”

Hagan, a Greensboro Democrat,  said she has been working to limit the growth in non-defense spending in the budget. She questioned the Obama plan that the Congressional Budget Office estimated would place the country under a $1.2 trillion annual deficit even a decade from now.

“I agree with a number of ideas in President Obama’s budget, but I was particularly concerned about the deficit spending in his proposal,” Hagan said in a speech at the North Carolina Associated Press Broadcast annual meeting at Elon University. “It’s completely unsustainable and unacceptable.”

Her decision to renounce even some of the popular president’s ideas comes as a striking contrast to her campaign last year, when she cozied to his mantra of change as North Carolina voters swept both into office. It underscores her eagerness to depart from the large-government plans of her party even as she tries to influence legislation as a backbencher in Washington’s upper chamber.

The  freshman lawmaker who took office on Capitol Hill just three months ago said she has been working with colleagues to cut the growth in non-defense spending from 12 percent in Obama’s budget to 6 percent. The former state Senate budget writer said politicians right now need to discourage spending that does not create jobs or improve the economy.
“We have to address entitlement reform, and we need a comprehensive tax reform,” she said.

At the same time, Hagan criticized the Obama plan for cutting agricultural spending by billions of dollars.

Hagan was pleased that Obama was putting the full funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the budget, along with relief from the alternative minimum tax. And she praised his investments in educational spending, including the Pell grants.
She also argued that Obama and lawmakers had been handed a difficult financial situation.

“President Bush left behind an absolutely abysmal fiscal legacy — an economy in a crisis and a budget in a deep deficit,” Hagan said. “We know how we got where we are now, but it’s our job to look forward, not backward.”

She said she wasn’t sure whether she would vote for the budget, saying minor and major changes could still be coming.
“This next week in the Senate is going to be a grueling week,” she said.
 

Accompanying Photos

H. Scott Hoffmann (News & Record)

Photo Caption: U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

ravencottage

March 28, 2009 - 8:15 pm EDT

If she is so concerned why did she vote for the trillion dollar stimulus bill in February? By her vote she also authorized the AIG bonuses. Woman is clearly in over her head.

MGDougherty

March 28, 2009 - 10:21 pm EDT

Even an economics 101 student would know that recession is no time to balance the budget. Hagan has betrayed her campaign rhetoric and seeks to move up from the backbench by emulating Joe Leiberman. Now there's a role model. Kay should reread her economics text again, reread her campaign speeches and be honest with us that she seeks leverage and visibility by playing hard to get for the Democrats, not the right economic solution for our country. If she is campaigning in 2014 and seeking help from her party and Obama, she better hope for widespread amnesia.

newkid

March 28, 2009 - 10:32 pm EDT

Keep in mind that the budget deficit under Bush was as bad...it's just that they kept the Iraq war costs "off the books." I think Ms. Hagan should remember: without the candidacy and election of Barack Obama, she would not be the U.S. Senator from North Carolina.

Maddie

March 28, 2009 - 10:42 pm EDT

During the election she trotted her kids out to every Obama event in Greensboro and now that she is in there to hell with Obama. Well katie, we are watching you and we are watching closely. There will be a time when you are going to need us. But I wonder will we be there?

MatthewI

March 28, 2009 - 11:41 pm EDT

Some of these comments seem very personal, and well down-right nasty. Why would you ever comment on Kay's kids or attribute all of her success to Obama? The reason why democrats won the past election was pretty simple, they chose to reach out to the middle. President Obama is very intelligent, charming, and a natural-born leader, who reaches across age, race, and socio-economic backgrounds. A large number of senators and representatives owe a great deal to President Obama for loaning them his star-power during the elections. However, the last time I checked the constitution, branches of government are separate for a reason, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Kay Hagan has a constitutional responsibility, one she swore to uphold by the way, requiring her to be a little more than just a talking head for the administration. Remember the middle made this happen for Obama & Democrats, represented by a variety of races and economic backgrounds. Kay is doing a great job, asking valid questions, like this budget is reaching too far, given the crisis we are in right now and looking for common ground. She also acknowledges that our present situation was due to mismanagement by Republicans & Bush. So before you get too venomous towards her, maybe you should remember what it was like before she came along. If you don't support Kay; then you are probably supporting republicans, because that's the other choice. And who among you is ready for that again?

william1944

March 29, 2009 - 2:36 am EDT

The Democratic leadership will discipline Kay and get her to "go along to get along". If she still doesn't see the light they will "primary" her and we can vote her out. Her recent approval ratings were below 50% and she obviously thinks she needs to lean heavily to the right to correct these low approval ratings. The way to fight Republican obstructionism is to make sure President Obama succeeds. Write or email Kay and tell her what you think about the President's plans.
We certainly did not send her to the Senate to support Republican obstructionism.

Doug Johnson

March 29, 2009 - 6:51 am EDT

Raven cottage, you are on the money. She voted for this simmulus with out reading it.
Obuma reaching out to the middle class, just wait until you get your tax bill in 2011.
Hagan voted for the CHIPS bill, 3600 tobacco workers will lose their jobs.
The big winners the illegals children, the big losers working folks children.
Mark Binker want to jump on this.
Bush is not flyng this plane now, Obuma is!.

newkid

March 29, 2009 - 11:27 am EDT

Thanks "Rush"

Panacea

March 29, 2009 - 11:28 am EDT

Let's face facts: NOBODY read the stimulus bill, except a handful of Republicans looking for ground to oppose on.

Doesn't matter whether the bill is good or bad for this country, lots of people had a hand in rushing it through.

I don't have a problem with what Hagan is doing yet. Jeez, give the woman a break! She's been in office less than 3 months. We have hardly enough to judge her or Obama. The things being tried haven't even been given a CHANCE to work yet.

We have no choice but to give it time.

AuntLily

March 29, 2009 - 6:09 pm EDT

Sen. Hagan is making a mistake casting her lot this early with the Bayh caucus. If North Carolina voters wanted same old Republican values ,they might have stuck with old Liddy. My wallet will remember this betrayal when she sends those begging letters.

rmacz

March 29, 2009 - 6:57 pm EDT

Hey folks, lets be candid, Hagan and the Democrates have a record of 9000 Pork Barrel projects attached to this bill. Perdue is out there bragging about bring home the bacon. These candidates ran on conservatism, but they vote liberal and then blame everything on the opposite party. History hasn't changed.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search