news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Johnson's departure package includes severance, retirement benefits

Thursday, March 5, 2009
(Updated Friday, March 6 - 5:13 am)

GREENSBORO - When Mitchell Johnson leaves city government in July, he'll take the family photos from his desk, his Jim Melvin bobblehead doll, and a pension of about $90,000 a year when he's ready to retire.

This week, as City Council members prepared to dismiss Johnson from his duties as Greensboro's city manager, they offered to keep him on as a city employee for a few extra months to ensure that his accumulated sick leave applies to his retirement.

It was a deal worked out by a handful of council members and approved during a closed session Tuesday night.

"I appreciate council's consideration," Johnson said Wednesday.

Johnson also will receive an additional six months salary, or about $89,500, plus benefits, as severance required by his open-ended contract.

On Tuesday night, the council voted 5-4 to relieve Johnson, who had been city manager since 2005, of his duties. The decision came after nearly a year of some council members calling for his job and questioning his leadership decisions.

But despite the criticism, Johnson had strong allies in Mayor Yvonne Johnson and council members Robbie Perkins, T. Dianne Bellamy-Small, Goldie Wells.

Until recently, Mitchell Johnson's supporters also included Councilwoman Sandra Anderson Groat and Councilman Zack Matheny.

Learning that Councilwoman Mary Rakestraw planned to call for Johnson's dismissal Tuesday, other council members needed to decide which side they would take.

On Friday, Groat said, she became fed up with the fighting among council members and decided Johnson needed to go. Matheny, who was questioning his own support of Johnson, followed suit.

Their decisions - combined with previous calls for Johnson's dismissal by council members Rakestraw, Mike Barber and Trudy Wade - meant there would be enough votes to fire Johnson.

Both Matheny and Groat said they met with Johnson to explain their decisions, and said they fought to make sure Johnson would receive good benefits.

Johnson will continue to work at his current salary, $179,000 a year, until July 15.

The sick leave that he accumulated over 26 years as a city employee - nearly a year and a half worth of sick time - will count toward his retirement as long as he is a city employee until this summer.

That accumulated time will ensure he receives about $90,000 a year from the state employee's retirement fund when he retires.

Matheny said Johnson got the city manager job at the wrong time - just as the city was dealing with accusations of racism within the police department. Police Chief David Wray later resigned after Johnson locked him out of his office. Those issues soured public opinion of Johnson early in his career as manager.

"He could pave Elm Street in golden sidewalks. It is not going to matter," Matheny said Wednesday. "He is still not going to get the benefit of the doubt."

Removing the city manager will help the city, residents, council and Johnson get a fresh start, Matheny said.

On Wednesday, Johnson got to work packing up his corner office to move to a new spot - a small, windowless space crammed next to rows of floor-to-ceiling filing cabinets.

His Jim Melvin bobblehead was on a small table. His files of confidential police information were in boxes under the desk. Cans of Coca-Cola were on the shelf.

Johnson was reluctant to discuss his issues with council members, and he declined to talk about what he might have done differently.

It's still unclear what he will do for the city during the next few months. He will be assigned some responsibilities by the new acting city manager, who likely will be appointed by council members Friday.

Some council members indicated Wednesday that Johnson likely would help with the city's budget preparations.

 

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Joseph Rodriguez (News & Record)

Photo Caption: City Manager Mitchell Johnson the Greensboro City Council meeting March 2.

WHY JOHNSON WAS FIRED
Mitchell Johnson caught flak for the way he handled former police Chief David Wray's departure in 2006 and other related issues. Council members criticized his communication style and his ability to delegate.

FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS
Johnson will work until July 15 at his current $179,000 annual salary, plus receive six months pay and benefits as severance.

WHAT'S NEXT?
The City Council must appoint an acting city manager and start a search committee to find the new manager.

The Tally

How Greensboro City Council members voted on a motion to dismiss City Manager Mitchell Johnson.

Voted no to dismissal

Yvonne Johnson: Johnson inherited problems and has done whatever the council asked, she says.

T. Dianne Bellamy-Small: He was good at his job, she says, and the arguments against him were political.

Robbie Perkins: Johnson was running the city well, he says.

Goldie Wells: Johnson has integrity, she says, and some council members did not give him a chance.

Voted yes to dismissal

Mike Barber: Barber has been critical of Johnson's management style and the way he handled problems in the police department.

Sandra Anderson Groat: Groat said Johnson was tangled up in council tensions.

Zack Matheny: Matheny likes and respects Johnson, but says the city needs to move on and could not do that with Johnson as manager.

Mary Rakestraw: Johnson has not been truthful or forthcoming with information, she says.

Trudy Wade: Wade has been disappointed with his ability to lead and communicate with council members.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Paul J

March 5, 2009 - 5:43 am EST

A good example of the idiots running city council. Do any of them have a brain when it comes to making contracts.I forgot the city attorney does that tells them to sign here, which they do. Now that he has been fired he will not be an asset to the taxpayers.

ncb

March 5, 2009 - 6:55 am EST

Zack Matheny is a joke. Or should I say a 'good politician'. Either way, GSO is still screwed in the end

markts1981

March 5, 2009 - 7:12 am EST

With the economy the way it is, its just amazing when Government officials can get fired and still walk away with taxpayer money. Perhaps we should start re-thinking these contracts, you know make one that says you don't do your job you don't get paid. Lawyers and Government officials make things difficult that aren't difficult. When you hire a person to do a job and that job is not done YOU DON'T LET THEM STAY so they can get all of their benefits and you absolutely should not continue to pay for their services when you decide they aren't doing anything in the first place. Wouldn't this be similar to the Golden Parachutes that everyone was up in arms about with bank officers??

chickenlittle02

March 5, 2009 - 7:30 am EST

Thank you, N&R, for getting the answers to these questions.It helps us citizens know what kind of judgement our council members are using as they conduct business on our behalf.
Whether this qualified as a Golden Parachute would depend entirely on what his contract says. One way to test it is for a citizen taxpayer to sue him and the city council over it. I would be interested to know, however, what Mr Johnson's total severance compensation would have looked like had he just been relieved of his employment the night he was fired. How much different is it than what he gets by being on the payroll till July? Could some kind of compromise package have been worked out that gave him some, but not all, of these benefits? Just curious.

doobydop

March 5, 2009 - 8:26 am EST

As a person who works in local government elsewhere in the state, I feel the need to comment on this article. I understand that people do not understand the compensation package that Mr. Johnson will be receiving, however, it is the standard. When a city/county manager is hired on, they negotiate a package that most often includes a generous severance package due to the volatile nature of their work. Managers are one of the only positions that serve at the will of the Council/Board and can be terminated at any time. A new council can be elected and at their very first meeting elect to dismiss the manager. The severance in the contract is to protect the manager from overzealous concil members who want to run the world. It makes the council think a little harder and avoid knee-jerk reactions. They say that a city/county manager who has never been fired has never done his or her job.

bigwill

March 5, 2009 - 10:30 am EST

Wow what a deal. Volatile job huh? I dont even come close to getting a $90K pension from my government contract job. I dont see the military paying out that much and its more volatile than a City Manager's job at anyday. Come on give me a break. I need to work for the city then if this is how things end up. I can sign a contract, F things up, deceive the people I work for, and still make more money after I am fired than someone who works hard labor everyday. This idiot has it made now and some of the council members just showed me that they are just in it for a popularity contest. They might as well run for Congress, they would fit right in.

MyTwoCents

March 5, 2009 - 8:26 am EST

Pretty good gig - if you can get it. No wonder this city's in the shape it is. Glad to see my tax dollars will continue to support an idiot. I wonder if maybe the city wont try and pull the same crap they did with Brady when he retired....oh wait; that was Johnson's doing, wasn't it? Guess that won't happen.

MyTwoCents

March 5, 2009 - 8:30 am EST

I wonder if Wray got a sweet deal like this.

tarheel2000

March 5, 2009 - 9:04 am EST

This whole thing just stinks!!! Keeping him on the payroll so he can retire early....

RangerMatt

March 5, 2009 - 5:43 pm EST

Nope, big difference between being fired and quitting in that respect.

rooster8786

March 5, 2009 - 10:04 am EST

It's good to see that Zack Matheny & Sandra Groat showed how ABSOLUTELY ignorant they. I hope the voters remember that at election time. To give an incompetent like Mitch Johnson $90K for a 6 month job with NO defined responsibilities or duties so that he can acrrue enough of whatever it takes to get his pension of $90,000 a year when he retires is ABSOLUTELY ludacris. Think of the unemployed taxpayers in Greensboro! No think of the EMPLOYED taxpayers that don't make $90K for a YEAR of hard work. How do you explain that to them? Go ahead and try. It seems that the only thing Matheny has figured out is to look out for himself, by getting a new job at Steven Bell Company, and the heck with his constituents and the money they pay the city. I only hope that Bell & Company, or whatever it calls itself now, doesn't have a "rightsizing that negatively impacts poor little Zack!

MyTwoCents

March 5, 2009 - 11:37 am EST

It's very sad - but when it comes to having a good memory at election time, we (collectively) suck. If that were not the case - how can anyone explain why T. Dianne Bellamy Small is still a member of the City Council?

bigwill

March 5, 2009 - 12:52 pm EST

Because if Bellamy-Small would have been ousted out of office that would have been discrimination.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: MOSTLY CLOUDY
  • Current Temperature: 49°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 54° L: 46°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search